Maison >base de données >tutoriel mysql >通过案例学调优之--OracleADDM
通过案例学调优之--OracleADDM
- WBOYoriginal
- 2016-06-07 14:52:002070parcourir
通过案例学调优之--Oracle ADDM 应用环境： 操作系统： RedHat EL55 Oracle： Oracle 10gR2 一、ADDM简介 在Oracle9i及之前，DBA们已经拥有了很多很好用的性能分析工具，比如，tkprof、sql_trace、statspack、set event 1004610053等等。这些工具能够帮助DBA
通过案例学调优之--Oracle ADDM
应用环境：
操作系统： RedHat EL55
Oracle： Oracle 10gR2
一、ADDM简介
在Oracle9i及之前，DBA们已经拥有了很多很好用的性能分析工具，比如，tkprof、sql_trace、statspack、set event 10046&10053等等。这些工具能够帮助DBA很快的定位性能问题。但这些工具都只给出一些统计数据，然后再由DBA们根据自己的经验进行优化。
那能不能由机器自动在统计数据的基础上给出优化建议呢？Oracle10g中就推出了新的优化诊断工具：数据库自动诊断监视工具（Automatic Database Diagnostic Monitor ADDM）和SQL优化建议工具（SQL Tuning Advisor STA）。这两个工具的结合使用，能使DBA节省大量优化时间，也大大减少了系统宕机的危险。简单点说，ADDM就是收集相关的统计数据到自动工作量知识库(Automatic Workload Repository AWR)中，而STA则根据这些数据，给出优化建议。例如，一个系统资源紧张，出现了明显的性能问题，由以往的办法，做个一个statspack快照，等30分钟，再做一次。查看报告，发现’ db file scattered read’事件在top 5 events里面。根据经验，这个事件一般可能是因为缺少索引、统计分析信息不够新、热表都放在一个数据文件上导致IO争用等原因引起的。根据这些经验，我们需要逐个来定位排除，比如查看语句的查询计划、查看user_tables的last_analysed子段，检查热块等等步骤来最后定位出原因，并给出优化建议。但是，有了STA以后，它就可以根据ADDM采集到的数据直接给出优化建议，甚至给出优化后的语句（抢了DBA的饭碗喽）。
ADDM能发现定位的问题包括：
操作系统内存页入页出问题
由于Oracle负载和非Oracle负载导致的CPU瓶颈问题
导致不同资源负载的Top SQL语句和对象——CPU消耗、IO带宽占用、潜在IO问题、RAC内部通讯繁忙
按照PLSQL和JAVA执行时间排的Top SQL语句.
过多地连接 (login/logoff).
过多硬解析问题——由于shared pool过小、书写问题、绑定大小不适应、解析失败原因引起的。
过多软解析问题
索引查询过多导致资源争用.
由于用户锁导致的过多的等待时间 (通过包dbms_lock加的锁)
由于DML锁导致的过多等待时间(例如锁住表了)
由于管道输出导致的过多等待时间(如通过包dbms_pipe.put进行管道输出)
由于并发更新同一个记录导致的过多等待时间(行级锁等待)
由于ITL不够导致的过多等待时间（大量的事务操作同一个数据块）
系统中过多的commit和rollback(logfile sync事件).
由于磁盘带宽太小和其他潜在问题（如由于logfile太小导致过多的checkpoint，MTTR设置问题，过多的undo操作等等）导致的IO性能问题I
对于DBWR进程写数据块，磁盘IO吞吐量不足
由于归档进程无法跟上redo日至产生的速度，导致系统变慢
redo数据文件太小导致的问题
由于扩展磁盘分配导致的争用
由于移动一个对象的高水位导致的争用问题
内存太小问题——SGA Target, PGA, Buffer Cache, Shared Pool
在一个实例或者一个机群环境中存在频繁读写争用的热块
在一个实例或者一个机群环境中存在频繁读写争用的热对象
RAC环境中内部通讯问题
LMS进程无法跟上导致锁请求阻塞
在RAC环境中由于阻塞和争用导致的实例倾斜
RMAN导致的IO和CPU问题
Streams和AQ问题
资源管理等待事件 有一点要记住：AWR收集的数据时放到内存中（share pool），通过一个新的后台进程MMON定期写到磁盘中。所以10g的share pool要求比以前版本更大，一般推荐比以前大15-20%。另外，还要求系统参数STATISTICS_LEVEL设置为TYPICAL（推荐）或ALL;
ALTER SESSION SET STATISTICS_LEVEL= TYPICAL;
二、案例：
1、采集AWR Snapshot
SQL> begin
2 dbms_workload_repository.create_snapshot('TYPICAL');
3 end;
4 /2、运行事务
scott用户执行一个资源消耗高的事务：
15:14:47 SCOTT@ prod>begin
15:34:41 2 for i in 1..1000000 loop
15:34:41 3 execute immediate 'insert into scott.t1 values ('||i||')';
15:34:41 4 end loop;
15:34:41 5 end;
15:34:41 6 /tom用户同时执行一个资源消耗高的事务：
15:34:45 TOM@ prod>begin
15:34:49 2 for i in 1..1000000 loop
15:34:49 3 execute immediate 'insert into scott.t1 values ('||i||')';
15:34:49 4 end loop;
15:34:49 5 end;
15:34:49 6 /3、再次采集AWR Snapshot
SQL> begin
2 dbms_workload_repository.create_snapshot('TYPICAL');
3 end;
4 /4、查询生成的快照
15:37:57 SYS@ prod> select snap_id,begin_interval_time,end_interval_time from dba_hist_snapshot order by snap_id asc
190 15-AUG-14 03.18.34.663 PM 15-AUG-14 03.36.36.686 PM
191 15-AUG-14 03.36.36.686 PM 15-AUG-14 03.37.18.352 PM
192 15-AUG-14 03.37.18.352 PM 15-AUG-14 03.40.17.649 PM
193 15-AUG-14 03.40.17.649 PM 15-AUG-14 03.42.38.632 PM
12 rows selected.
5、创建优化任务并执行
15:51:01 SYS@ prod>DECLARE
15:51:57 2 task_name VARCHAR2(30) := 'DEMO_ADDM03';
15:51:57 3 task_desc VARCHAR2(30) := 'ADDM Feature Test';
15:51:57 4 task_id NUMBER;
15:51:57 5 BEGIN
15:51:57 6 dbms_advisor.create_task('ADDM', task_id, task_name, task_desc, null);
15:51:57 7 dbms_advisor.set_task_parameter(task_name, 'START_SNAPSHOT', 192);
15:51:57 8 dbms_advisor.set_task_parameter(task_name, 'END_SNAPSHOT', 193);
15:51:58 9 dbms_advisor.set_task_parameter(task_name, 'INSTANCE', 1);
15:51:58 10 dbms_advisor.set_task_parameter(task_name, 'DB_ID', 199802235);
15:51:58 11 dbms_advisor.execute_task(task_name);
15:51:58 12 END;
15:51:59 13 /
PL/SQL procedure successfully completed. 其中，set_task_parameter是用来设置任务参数的。START_SNAPSHOT是起始快照ID，END_SNAPSHOT是结束快照ID，INSTANCE是实例号，对于单实例，一般是1，在RAC环境下，可以通过查询视图v$instance得到，DB_ID是数据库的唯一识别号，可以通过查询v$database查到。
6、查看优化建议结果
15:53:18 SYS@ prod>SELECT dbms_advisor.get_task_report('DEMO_ADDM03','TEXT', 'ALL') FROM DUAL;
DETAILED ADDM REPORT FOR TASK 'DEMO_ADDM03' WITH ID 1012
--------------------------------------------------------
Analysis Period: 15-AUG-2014 from 15:40:18 to 15:42:39
Database ID/Instance: 199802235/1
Database/Instance Names: PROD/prod
Host Name: rh55
Database Version: 10.2.0.1.0
Snapshot Range: from 192 to 193
Database Time: 305 seconds
Average Database Load: 2.2 active sessions
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
FINDING 1: 100% impact (305 seconds)
------------------------------------
Host CPU was a bottleneck and the instance was consuming 88% of the host CPU.
All wait times will be inflated by wait for CPU.
RECOMMENDATION 1: Host Configuration, 100% benefit (305 seconds)
ACTION: Consider adding more CPUs to the host or adding instances
serving the database on other hosts.
ACTION: Also consider using Oracle Database Resource Manager to
prioritize the workload from various consumer groups.
RECOMMENDATION 2: Application Analysis, 33% benefit (101 seconds)
ACTION: Parsing SQL statements were consuming significant CPU. Please
refer to other findings in this task about parsing for further
details.
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION:
Host CPU consumption was 100%. CPU runqueue statistics are not
available from the host's OS. This disables ADDM's ability to estimate
the impact of this finding. The instance spent significant time on CPU.
However, there were no predominant SQL statements responsible for the
CPU load.
FINDING 2: 96% impact (294 seconds)
-----------------------------------
SQL statements consuming significant database time were found.
RECOMMENDATION 1: SQL Tuning, 92% benefit (280 seconds)
ACTION: Tune the PL/SQL block with SQL_ID "0d4kcvj32z62p". Refer to the
"Tuning PL/SQL Applications" chapter of Oracle's "PL/SQL User's Guide
and Reference"
RELEVANT OBJECT: SQL statement with SQL_ID 0d4kcvj32z62p
begin
for i in 1..1000000 loop
execute immediate 'insert into scott.t1 values ('||i||')';
end loop;
end;
RECOMMENDATION 2: SQL Tuning, 2.5% benefit (8 seconds)
ACTION: Investigate the SQL statement with SQL_ID "7ng34ruy5awxq" for
possible performance improvements.
RELEVANT OBJECT: SQL statement with SQL_ID 7ng34ruy5awxq and
PLAN_HASH 3992920156
select i.obj#,i.ts#,i.file#,i.block#,i.intcols,i.type#,i.flags,i.prop
erty,i.pctfree$,i.initrans,i.maxtrans,i.blevel,i.leafcnt,i.distkey,i.
lblkkey,i.dblkkey,i.clufac,i.cols,i.analyzetime,i.samplesize,i.dataob
j#,nvl(i.degree,1),nvl(i.instances,1),i.rowcnt,mod(i.pctthres$,256),i
.indmethod#,i.trunccnt,nvl(c.unicols,0),nvl(c.deferrable#+c.valid#,0)
,nvl(i.spare1,i.intcols),i.spare4,i.spare2,i.spare6,decode(i.pctthres
$,null,null,mod(trunc(i.pctthres$/256),256)),ist.cachedblk,ist.cacheh
it,ist.logicalread from ind$ i, ind_stats$ ist, (select enabled,
min(cols) unicols,min(to_number(bitand(defer,1)))
deferrable#,min(to_number(bitand(defer,4))) valid# from cdef$ where
obj#=:1 and enabled > 1 group by enabled) c where i.obj#=c.enabled(+)
and i.obj# = ist.obj#(+) and i.bo#=:1 order by i.obj#
RATIONALE: SQL statement with SQL_ID "7ng34ruy5awxq" was executed 596
times and had an average elapsed time of 0.012 seconds.
RECOMMENDATION 3: SQL Tuning, 2.1% benefit (6 seconds)
ACTION: Investigate the SQL statement with SQL_ID "0k8522rmdzg4k" for
possible performance improvements.
RELEVANT OBJECT: SQL statement with SQL_ID 0k8522rmdzg4k and
PLAN_HASH 2057665657
select privilege# from sysauth$ where (grantee#=:1 or grantee#=1) and
privilege#>0
RECOMMENDATION 4: SQL Tuning, 2% benefit (6 seconds)
ACTION: Use bigger fetch arrays while fetching results from the SELECT
statement with SQL_ID "7ng34ruy5awxq".
RELEVANT OBJECT: SQL statement with SQL_ID 7ng34ruy5awxq and
PLAN_HASH 3992920156
select i.obj#,i.ts#,i.file#,i.block#,i.intcols,i.type#,i.flags,i.prop
erty,i.pctfree$,i.initrans,i.maxtrans,i.blevel,i.leafcnt,i.distkey,i.
lblkkey,i.dblkkey,i.clufac,i.cols,i.analyzetime,i.samplesize,i.dataob
j#,nvl(i.degree,1),nvl(i.instances,1),i.rowcnt,mod(i.pctthres$,256),i
.indmethod#,i.trunccnt,nvl(c.unicols,0),nvl(c.deferrable#+c.valid#,0)
,nvl(i.spare1,i.intcols),i.spare4,i.spare2,i.spare6,decode(i.pctthres
$,null,null,mod(trunc(i.pctthres$/256),256)),ist.cachedblk,ist.cacheh
it,ist.logicalread from ind$ i, ind_stats$ ist, (select enabled,
min(cols) unicols,min(to_number(bitand(defer,1)))
deferrable#,min(to_number(bitand(defer,4))) valid# from cdef$ where
obj#=:1 and enabled > 1 group by enabled) c where i.obj#=c.enabled(+)
and i.obj# = ist.obj#(+) and i.bo#=:1 order by i.obj#
FINDING 3: 49% impact (149 seconds)
-----------------------------------
Soft parsing of SQL statements was consuming significant database time.
RECOMMENDATION 1: Application Analysis, 49% benefit (149 seconds)
ACTION: Investigate application logic to keep open the frequently used
cursors. Note that cursors are closed by both cursor close calls and
session disconnects.
RECOMMENDATION 2: DB Configuration, 49% benefit (149 seconds)
ACTION: Consider increasing the maximum number of open cursors a session
can have by increasing the value of parameter "open_cursors".
ACTION: Consider increasing the session cursor cache size by increasing
the value of parameter "session_cached_cursors".
RATIONALE: The value of parameter "open_cursors" was "300" during the
analysis period.
RATIONALE: The value of parameter "session_cached_cursors" was "20"
during the analysis period.
SYMPTOMS THAT LED TO THE FINDING:
SYMPTOM: Contention for latches related to the shared pool was consuming
significant database time. (12% impact [36 seconds])
INFO: Waits for "latch: library cache" amounted to 11% of database
time.
SYMPTOM: Wait class "Concurrency" was consuming significant database
time. (13% impact [39 seconds])
FINDING 4: 32% impact (97 seconds)
----------------------------------
Hard parsing of SQL statements was consuming significant database time.
NO RECOMMENDATIONS AVAILABLE
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION:
Hard parses due to cursor environment mismatch were not consuming
significant database time.
Hard parsing SQL statements that encountered parse errors was not
consuming significant database time.
Hard parses due to literal usage and cursor invalidation were not
consuming significant database time.
The SGA was adequately sized.
SYMPTOMS THAT LED TO THE FINDING:
SYMPTOM: Contention for latches related to the shared pool was consuming
significant database time. (12% impact [36 seconds])
INFO: Waits for "latch: library cache" amounted to 11% of database
time.
SYMPTOM: Wait class "Concurrency" was consuming significant database
time. (13% impact [39 seconds])
FINDING 5: 2.6% impact (8 seconds)
----------------------------------
Session connect and disconnect calls were consuming significant database time.
RECOMMENDATION 1: Application Analysis, 2.6% benefit (8 seconds)
ACTION: Investigate application logic for possible reduction of connect
and disconnect calls. For example, you might use a connection pool
scheme in the middle tier.
FINDING 6: 2.2% impact (7 seconds)
----------------------------------
PL/SQL execution consumed significant database time.
RECOMMENDATION 1: SQL Tuning, 2.2% benefit (7 seconds)
ACTION: Tune the PL/SQL block with SQL_ID "0d4kcvj32z62p". Refer to the
"Tuning PL/SQL Applications" chapter of Oracle's "PL/SQL User's Guide
and Reference"
RELEVANT OBJECT: SQL statement with SQL_ID 0d4kcvj32z62p
begin
for i in 1..1000000 loop
execute immediate 'insert into scott.t1 values ('||i||')';
end loop;
end;
FINDING 7: 1.8% impact (5 seconds)
----------------------------------
Buffer cache writes due to small log files were consuming significant database
time.
RECOMMENDATION 1: DB Configuration, 1.8% benefit (5 seconds)
ACTION: Increase the size of the log files to 188 M to hold at least 20
minutes of redo information.
SYMPTOMS THAT LED TO THE FINDING:
SYMPTOM: The throughput of the I/O subsystem was significantly lower
than expected. (1% impact [3 seconds])
SYMPTOM: Wait class "User I/O" was consuming significant database
time. (2.1% impact [6 seconds])
FINDING 8: 1.2% impact (4 seconds)
----------------------------------
Undo I/O was a significant portion (59%) of the total database I/O.
NO RECOMMENDATIONS AVAILABLE
SYMPTOMS THAT LED TO THE FINDING:
SYMPTOM: The throughput of the I/O subsystem was significantly lower
than expected. (1% impact [3 seconds])
SYMPTOM: Wait class "User I/O" was consuming significant database
time. (2.1% impact [6 seconds])
FINDING 9: 1% impact (3 seconds)
--------------------------------
The throughput of the I/O subsystem was significantly lower than expected.
RECOMMENDATION 1: Host Configuration, 1% benefit (3 seconds)
ACTION: Consider increasing the throughput of the I/O subsystem.
Oracle's recommended solution is to stripe all data file using the
SAME methodology. You might also need to increase the number of disks
for better performance. Alternatively, consider using Oracle's
Automatic Storage Management solution.
RATIONALE: During the analysis period, the average data files' I/O
throughput was 18 K per second for reads and 74 K per second for
writes. The average response time for single block reads was 19
milliseconds.
RECOMMENDATION 2: Host Configuration, 1% benefit (3 seconds)
ACTION: The performance of file
/u01/app/oracle/oradata/prod/system01.dbf was significantly worse
than other files. If striping all files using the SAME methodology is
not possible, consider striping this file over multiple disks.
RELEVANT OBJECT: database file
"/u01/app/oracle/oradata/prod/system01.dbf"
RATIONALE: The average response time for single block reads for this
file was 20 milliseconds.
SYMPTOMS THAT LED TO THE FINDING:
SYMPTOM: Wait class "User I/O" was consuming significant database time.
(2.1% impact [6 seconds])
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
----------------------
Wait class "Application" was not consuming significant database time.
Wait class "Commit" was not consuming significant database time.
Wait class "Configuration" was not consuming significant database time.
Wait class "Network" was not consuming significant database time.
The analysis of I/O performance is based on the default assumption that the
average read time for one database block is 10000 micro-seconds.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
TERMINOLOGY
-----------
DATABASE TIME: This is the ADDM's measurement of throughput. From the user's
point of view: this is the total amount of time spent by users waiting for
a response from the database after issuing a call (not including
networking). From the database instance point of view: this is the total
time spent by forground processes waiting for a database resource (e.g.,
read I/O), running on the CPU and waiting for a free CPU (run-queue). The
target of ADDM analysis is to reduce this metric as much as possible,
thereby reducing the instance's response time.
AVERAGE DATABASE LOAD: At any given time we can count how many users (also
called 'Active Sessions') are waiting for an answer from the instance. This
is the ADDM's measurement for instance load. The 'Average Database Load' is
the average of the the load measurement taken over the entire analysis
period. We get this number by dividing the 'Database Time' by the analysis
period. For example, if the analysis period is 30 minutes and the 'Database
Time' is 90 minutes, we have an average of 3 users waiting for a response.
IMPACT: Each finding has an 'Impact' associated with it. The impact is the
portion of the 'Database Time' the finding deals with. If we assume that
the problem described by the finding is completely solved, then the
'Database Time' will be reduced by the amount of the 'Impact'.
BENEFIT: Each recommendation has a 'benefit' associated with it. The ADDM
analysis estimates that the 'Database Time' can be reduced by the 'benefit'
amount if all the actions of the recommendation are performed.
Elapsed: 00:00:00.517、诊断分析结果
我们从上面的建议结果看到了，ADDM Report的结果与Statspack Report的结果大不相同。Statspack Report的结果给出的都是统计数据、各种事件，然后由DBA根据这些数据给出优化建议，而ADDM Report的结果包含就已经是给出的优化建议了
第一部分：
Analysis Period: 15-AUG-2014 from 15:40:18 to 15:42:39
Database ID/Instance: 199802235/1
Database/Instance Names: PROD/prod
Host Name: rh55
Database Version: 10.2.0.1.0
Snapshot Range: from 192 to 193
Database Time: 305 seconds
Average Database Load: 2.2 active sessions这一部分包括一些基础信息，分析时间段、DB和instance ID&名字、主机名字、Oracle版本、快照范围、数据库消耗时间、多少个活动会话。
第二部分：
下面就是ADDM发现的问题，并给出的相应建议。在我们这个例子中总共发现9个问题，下面一一解释一下。
第一个问题：
FINDING 1: 100% impact (305 seconds)
------------------------------------
Host CPU was a bottleneck and the instance was consuming 88% of the host CPU.
All wait times will be inflated by wait for CPU.
RECOMMENDATION 1: Host Configuration, 100% benefit (305 seconds)
ACTION: Consider adding more CPUs to the host or adding instances
serving the database on other hosts.
ACTION: Also consider using Oracle Database Resource Manager to
prioritize the workload from various consumer groups.
RECOMMENDATION 2: Application Analysis, 33% benefit (101 seconds)
ACTION: Parsing SQL statements were consuming significant CPU. Please
refer to other findings in this task about parsing for further
details.
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION:
Host CPU consumption was 100%. CPU runqueue statistics are not
available from the host's OS. This disables ADDM's ability to estimate
the impact of this finding. The instance spent significant time on CPU.
However, there were no predominant SQL statements responsible for the
CPU load.
这个问题的描述是，实例消耗的CPU事件占据了大量的数据库运行时间。ADDM给了两个建议
建议一：由于占用了大量的CPU资源，Oracle建议添加更多的CPU，或者使用Oracle Resource Manager进行资源的优化
建议二：Parse占用了大量的CPU时间，建议对sql语句进行优化，减少parse占用的cpu时间
第二个问题：
FINDING 2: 96% impact (294 seconds)
-----------------------------------
SQL statements consuming significant database time were found.
RECOMMENDATION 1: SQL Tuning, 92% benefit (280 seconds)
ACTION: Tune the PL/SQL block with SQL_ID "0d4kcvj32z62p". Refer to the
"Tuning PL/SQL Applications" chapter of Oracle's "PL/SQL User's Guide
and Reference"
RELEVANT OBJECT: SQL statement with SQL_ID 0d4kcvj32z62p
begin
for i in 1..1000000 loop
execute immediate 'insert into scott.t1 values ('||i||')';
end loop;
end;
Oracle建议对“ execute immediate 'insert into scott.t1 values ('||i||')'; ”语句进行优化，可以将性能提高92%，这个sql也是影响我们性能的最主要的语句。
第三个问题：
FINDING 3: 49% impact (149 seconds)
-----------------------------------
Soft parsing of SQL statements was consuming significant database time.
RECOMMENDATION 1: Application Analysis, 49% benefit (149 seconds)
ACTION: Investigate application logic to keep open the frequently used
cursors. Note that cursors are closed by both cursor close calls and
session disconnects.
RECOMMENDATION 2: DB Configuration, 49% benefit (149 seconds)
ACTION: Consider increasing the maximum number of open cursors a session
can have by increasing the value of parameter "open_cursors".
ACTION: Consider increasing the session cursor cache size by increasing
the value of parameter "session_cached_cursors".
RATIONALE: The value of parameter "open_cursors" was "300" during the
analysis period.
RATIONALE: The value of parameter "session_cached_cursors" was "20"
during the analysis period.
SYMPTOMS THAT LED TO THE FINDING:
SYMPTOM: Contention for latches related to the shared pool was consuming
significant database time. (12% impact [36 seconds])
INFO: Waits for "latch: library cache" amounted to 11% of database
time.
SYMPTOM: Wait class "Concurrency" was consuming significant database
time. (13% impact [39 seconds])
问题三，Oracle建议减少软解析的次数，对经常调用的cursor进行cache；可以调整“ session_cached_cursors"， "open_cursors"等参数。
第四个问题：
FINDING 4: 32% impact (97 seconds)
----------------------------------
Hard parsing of SQL statements was consuming significant database time.
NO RECOMMENDATIONS AVAILABLE
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION:
Hard parses due to cursor environment mismatch were not consuming
significant database time.
Hard parsing SQL statements that encountered parse errors was not
consuming significant database time.
Hard parses due to literal usage and cursor invalidation were not
consuming significant database time.
The SGA was adequately sized.
SYMPTOMS THAT LED TO THE FINDING:
SYMPTOM: Contention for latches related to the shared pool was consuming
significant database time. (12% impact [36 seconds])
INFO: Waits for "latch: library cache" amounted to 11% of database
time.
SYMPTOM: Wait class "Concurrency" was consuming significant database
time. (13% impact [39 seconds])
减少硬解析次数，使用绑定变量或者调整library cache的size
第五个问题：
FINDING 5: 2.6% impact (8 seconds)
----------------------------------
Session connect and disconnect calls were consuming significant database time.
RECOMMENDATION 1: Application Analysis, 2.6% benefit (8 seconds)
ACTION: Investigate application logic for possible reduction of connect
and disconnect calls. For example, you might use a connection pool
scheme in the middle tier.
Oracle建议通过中间件建立connection pool减少会话连接的资源消耗
第六个问题：
FINDING 6: 2.2% impact (7 seconds)
----------------------------------
PL/SQL execution consumed significant database time.
RECOMMENDATION 1: SQL Tuning, 2.2% benefit (7 seconds)
ACTION: Tune the PL/SQL block with SQL_ID "0d4kcvj32z62p". Refer to the
"Tuning PL/SQL Applications" chapter of Oracle's "PL/SQL User's Guide
and Reference"
RELEVANT OBJECT: SQL statement with SQL_ID 0d4kcvj32z62p
begin
for i in 1..1000000 loop
execute immediate 'insert into scott.t1 values ('||i||')';
end loop;
end;
Oracle建议对“ execute immediate 'insert into scott.t1 values ('||i||')'; ”语句进行优化
第七个问题：
FINDING 7: 1.8% impact (5 seconds)
----------------------------------
Buffer cache writes due to small log files were consuming significant database
time.
RECOMMENDATION 1: DB Configuration, 1.8% benefit (5 seconds)
ACTION: Increase the size of the log files to 188 M to hold at least 20
minutes of redo information.
SYMPTOMS THAT LED TO THE FINDING:
SYMPTOM: The throughput of the I/O subsystem was significantly lower
than expected. (1% impact [3 seconds])
SYMPTOM: Wait class "User I/O" was consuming significant database
time. (2.1% impact [6 seconds])
由于日志切换比较频繁，Oracle建议调整redo size；建议调整为：Increase the size of the log files to 188 M to hold at least 20 minutes of redo information.
第八个问题：
FINDING 8: 1.2% impact (4 seconds)
----------------------------------
Undo I/O was a significant portion (59%) of the total database I/O.
NO RECOMMENDATIONS AVAILABLE
SYMPTOMS THAT LED TO THE FINDING:
SYMPTOM: The throughput of the I/O subsystem was significantly lower
than expected. (1% impact [3 seconds])
SYMPTOM: Wait class "User I/O" was consuming significant database
time. (2.1% impact [6 seconds])
Oracle建议调整undo datafile的I/O
第九个问题：
FINDING 9: 1% impact (3 seconds)
--------------------------------
The throughput of the I/O subsystem was significantly lower than expected.
RECOMMENDATION 1: Host Configuration, 1% benefit (3 seconds)
ACTION: Consider increasing the throughput of the I/O subsystem.
Oracle's recommended solution is to stripe all data file using the
SAME methodology. You might also need to increase the number of disks
for better performance. Alternatively, consider using Oracle's
Automatic Storage Management solution.
RATIONALE: During the analysis period, the average data files' I/O
throughput was 18 K per second for reads and 74 K per second for
writes. The average response time for single block reads was 19
milliseconds.
RECOMMENDATION 2: Host Configuration, 1% benefit (3 seconds)
ACTION: The performance of file
/u01/app/oracle/oradata/prod/system01.dbf was significantly worse
than other files. If striping all files using the SAME methodology is
not possible, consider striping this file over multiple disks.
RELEVANT OBJECT: database file
"/u01/app/oracle/oradata/prod/system01.dbf"
RATIONALE: The average response time for single block reads for this
file was 20 milliseconds.
SYMPTOMS THAT LED TO THE FINDING:
SYMPTOM: Wait class "User I/O" was consuming significant database time.
(2.1% impact [6 seconds])调整磁盘的I/O,可以通过strip，来对磁盘I/O进行优化；建议对system表空间进行I/O优化，可以通过条带化将数据存储到多个磁盘上。
8、使用STA来优化语句
ADDM得出了诊
Déclaration：
Le contenu de cet article est volontairement contribué par les internautes et les droits d'auteur appartiennent à l'auteur original. Ce site n'assume aucune responsabilité légale correspondante. Si vous trouvez un contenu suspecté de plagiat ou de contrefaçon, veuillez contacter admin@php.cn
Article précédent：启动MySQL数据库的4妙招Article suivant：程序员绘画作品：牛的全家福