JS performance analysis of adding items to array_javascript skills
Compared the performance between 4 ways to add items to an array:
Use indexer to add
console.time("index");
var a = [];
for (var i = 0, l = times; i a[i] = i;
}
console.timeEnd("index");
Use push method
console.time("push");
var a = [];
for (var i = 0, l = times; i a.push(i);
}
console.timeEnd("push");
Use concat method
console.time("concat");
var a = [];
for (var i = 0, l = times; i a.concat(i);
}
console.timeEnd("concat");
Use the concat method, the parameter is an array
console.time("concat with array");
var a = [];
for (var i = 0, l = times; i a.concat([i]);
}
console.timeEnd("concat with array");
Set times to 10,000 (ten thousand) times:
index: 0.310ms
push: 1.476ms
concat: 8.911ms
concat with array: 2.261ms
Set times to 100000 (one hundred thousand) times:
index: 1.967ms
push: 11.980ms
concat: 70.410ms
concat with array: 28.292ms
Set times to 1000000 (millions) times:
index: 138.559ms
push: 93.074ms
concat: 608.768ms
concat with array: 243.371ms
Set times to 10000000 (ten million) times:
index: 1473.733ms
push: 611.636ms
concat: 6058.528ms
concat with array: 2431.689ms
Summary
This conclusion is only applicable to Chrome browser
The execution efficiency of the concat method is the slowest
Compared with the parameter passing of the two concat methods, when the parameters are accepted as arrays, the execution efficiency is higher than when the parameters are accepted as non-arrays
In most cases, the execution efficiency of the indexer is higher than that of the push method
When the number of executions increases, the execution efficiency of the indexer begins to be inferior to the push method
Browser comparison
Thanks to the netizen for pointing out that I lack experience, so I will add a horizontal comparison between browsers here
The first is to use the concat method. In IE and Firefox, if the parameter is an array, the execution efficiency is slower than if the parameter is a non-array, but the difference is not big
Then the index and push methods are definitely faster than concat. Using the index method in IE is always faster than push. In Firefox, push is slightly better but the difference is not big
Comparing the execution efficiency of the index and push methods between the three browsers, the difference is huge. The execution efficiency of Firefox is much higher than that of IE and Chrome. In the case of millions of times, it is basically 10 times faster. Compared with other browsers, the execution efficiency of Firefox is basically 10 times faster. The slowest of the two
The following are the results of millions of times:
// firefox
index: timer started
index: 229.79ms
push: timer started
push: 205.12ms
concat: timer started
concat: 2136.99ms
concat with array: timer started
concat with array: 2365.18ms
```
//ie
index: 2,533.744 milliseconds
push: 3,865.979 milliseconds
concat: 4,303.139 milliseconds
concat with array: 4,792.208 milliseconds
This article only discusses the performance of JS, and deepens friends' understanding of javascript through comparison. I hope you will like it.

JavaScript's applications in the real world include server-side programming, mobile application development and Internet of Things control: 1. Server-side programming is realized through Node.js, suitable for high concurrent request processing. 2. Mobile application development is carried out through ReactNative and supports cross-platform deployment. 3. Used for IoT device control through Johnny-Five library, suitable for hardware interaction.

I built a functional multi-tenant SaaS application (an EdTech app) with your everyday tech tool and you can do the same. First, what’s a multi-tenant SaaS application? Multi-tenant SaaS applications let you serve multiple customers from a sing

This article demonstrates frontend integration with a backend secured by Permit, building a functional EdTech SaaS application using Next.js. The frontend fetches user permissions to control UI visibility and ensures API requests adhere to role-base

JavaScript is the core language of modern web development and is widely used for its diversity and flexibility. 1) Front-end development: build dynamic web pages and single-page applications through DOM operations and modern frameworks (such as React, Vue.js, Angular). 2) Server-side development: Node.js uses a non-blocking I/O model to handle high concurrency and real-time applications. 3) Mobile and desktop application development: cross-platform development is realized through ReactNative and Electron to improve development efficiency.

The latest trends in JavaScript include the rise of TypeScript, the popularity of modern frameworks and libraries, and the application of WebAssembly. Future prospects cover more powerful type systems, the development of server-side JavaScript, the expansion of artificial intelligence and machine learning, and the potential of IoT and edge computing.

JavaScript is the cornerstone of modern web development, and its main functions include event-driven programming, dynamic content generation and asynchronous programming. 1) Event-driven programming allows web pages to change dynamically according to user operations. 2) Dynamic content generation allows page content to be adjusted according to conditions. 3) Asynchronous programming ensures that the user interface is not blocked. JavaScript is widely used in web interaction, single-page application and server-side development, greatly improving the flexibility of user experience and cross-platform development.

Python is more suitable for data science and machine learning, while JavaScript is more suitable for front-end and full-stack development. 1. Python is known for its concise syntax and rich library ecosystem, and is suitable for data analysis and web development. 2. JavaScript is the core of front-end development. Node.js supports server-side programming and is suitable for full-stack development.

JavaScript does not require installation because it is already built into modern browsers. You just need a text editor and a browser to get started. 1) In the browser environment, run it by embedding the HTML file through tags. 2) In the Node.js environment, after downloading and installing Node.js, run the JavaScript file through the command line.


Hot AI Tools

Undresser.AI Undress
AI-powered app for creating realistic nude photos

AI Clothes Remover
Online AI tool for removing clothes from photos.

Undress AI Tool
Undress images for free

Clothoff.io
AI clothes remover

AI Hentai Generator
Generate AI Hentai for free.

Hot Article

Hot Tools

SublimeText3 Mac version
God-level code editing software (SublimeText3)

DVWA
Damn Vulnerable Web App (DVWA) is a PHP/MySQL web application that is very vulnerable. Its main goals are to be an aid for security professionals to test their skills and tools in a legal environment, to help web developers better understand the process of securing web applications, and to help teachers/students teach/learn in a classroom environment Web application security. The goal of DVWA is to practice some of the most common web vulnerabilities through a simple and straightforward interface, with varying degrees of difficulty. Please note that this software

SublimeText3 Chinese version
Chinese version, very easy to use

mPDF
mPDF is a PHP library that can generate PDF files from UTF-8 encoded HTML. The original author, Ian Back, wrote mPDF to output PDF files "on the fly" from his website and handle different languages. It is slower than original scripts like HTML2FPDF and produces larger files when using Unicode fonts, but supports CSS styles etc. and has a lot of enhancements. Supports almost all languages, including RTL (Arabic and Hebrew) and CJK (Chinese, Japanese and Korean). Supports nested block-level elements (such as P, DIV),

EditPlus Chinese cracked version
Small size, syntax highlighting, does not support code prompt function