Home >Backend Development >Golang >Comparison of lock optimization algorithms for golang function concurrent cache
In Go language concurrent cache optimization, read-write locks allow concurrent reads but exclusive writes, while mutex locks only allow serial access to shared data. Read-write locks help improve read performance, while mutex lock operations are simpler. It is recommended to use read-write locks in scenarios where reading is the main focus, and mutex locks are recommended when writing is the main focus.
Comparison of lock optimization algorithms for Go function concurrent cache
Introduction
In In high-concurrency systems, access to shared data needs to ensure data consistency and isolation. To achieve this goal, locking mechanisms are often used to control access to shared data. When using Go language to develop concurrent programs, there are two commonly used lock optimization algorithms: read-write locks and mutex locks. This article will compare these two algorithms and analyze their advantages and disadvantages.
Read-write lock
Read-write lock is a lock that allows multiple goroutines to read data at the same time, but only one goroutine can write data. When a goroutine needs to write data, it must acquire a write lock. The acquisition of write locks is mutually exclusive, that is, when a goroutine has acquired the write lock, other goroutines must wait for the write lock to be released before they can acquire it.
goroutine code example using read-write lock:
package main import ( "sync" ) var rwMutex sync.RWMutex func main() { go func() { rwMutex.Lock() // do something rwMutex.Unlock() }() go func() { rwMutex.RLock() // do something rwMutex.RUnlock() }() }
Mutex lock
Mutex lock is a kind of only A lock that allows a goroutine to access shared data. When a goroutine needs to access shared data, it must acquire a mutex. The acquisition of the mutex lock is mutually exclusive, that is, when a goroutine has acquired the mutex lock, other goroutines must wait for the mutex lock to be released before they can acquire it.
goroutine code example using mutex lock:
package main import ( "sync" ) var mutex sync.Mutex func main() { go func() { mutex.Lock() // do something mutex.Unlock() }() go func() { mutex.Lock() // do something mutex.Unlock() }() }
Comparison
Advantages:
Disadvantages:
Selection recommendations
Practical case
Using read-write locks to cache frequently accessed data:
package main import ( "sync" ) type CacheEntry struct { Value interface{} } type Cache struct { rwMutex sync.RWMutex Data map[string]CacheEntry } func NewCache() *Cache { return &Cache{ Data: make(map[string]CacheEntry), } } func (c *Cache) Get(key string) interface{} { c.rwMutex.RLock() defer c.rwMutex.RUnlock() return c.Data[key].Value } func (c *Cache) Set(key string, value interface{}) { c.rwMutex.Lock() defer c.rwMutex.Unlock() c.Data[key] = CacheEntry{Value: value} }
The above is the detailed content of Comparison of lock optimization algorithms for golang function concurrent cache. For more information, please follow other related articles on the PHP Chinese website!