The follow-up is coming! OpenAI "linked" Musk to its official website, and multiple email exchanges were exposed

The lawsuit between Musk and OpenAI is enough to be recorded in the history of AI. It can be said to be a drama!

On March 5, OpenAI issued a statement titled "OpenAI and Elon Musk" on its official website, responding to Musk's suggestions and emphasizing that OpenAI Adhere to a stance of openness and a spirit of collaboration. The statement also pointed out that OpenAI does not agree with the idea of ​​turning to "CloseAI" for profit, and insists that the development of technology should put social interests first. At the same time, the statement also criticized Musk's strong stance on organizational control and emphasized that OpenAI will continue to be committed to promoting the development of artificial intelligence technology while maintaining the principles of transparency, fairness and openness

At the end of the statement "Musk and I", OpenAI even played the emotional card, crying with emotion, "We are very sad because of a person we deeply admire - he once inspired us to move towards higher goals. , then he said we would fail and founded a competitor. When we started making meaningful progress toward OpenAI's mission without him, he sued us."

Can this breakup letter turn the tide and get angry netizens to join OpenAI again?

1. The helplessness of closed source - not enough money

OpenAI admitted in the statement that AI is far more "burning money" than imagined.

Musk has expressed his willingness to provide an initial capital commitment of US$1 billion to OpenAI, emphasizing in the email that "I will bear whatever others do not provide." However, OpenAI has actually raised less than $45 million from Musk, with more than $90 million coming from other donors.

Secondly, in early 2017, OpenAI realized that the path to AGI would require burning billions of dollars per year. Musk also understood that this figure was far more than what a non-profit organization could raise, and believed that OpenAI needed to become a for-profit entity. This was the beginning of the intensification of the conflict.

Musk’s email promising to provide funds

2. The trigger for the breakup - Quan failed to negotiate

Musk pointed out that if OpenAI wants to compete with Google’s DeepMind, it must obtain capital support equivalent to Google. In the process of promoting OpenAI to become a for-profit organization, Musk has proposed multiple plans, but failed to reach a consensus.

After turning to a profitable company, Musk hopes to obtain a majority stake in OpenAI, initial board control, and serve as CEO.

This proposal was rejected because "any individual having absolute control over OpenAI" was contrary to its company mission.

After that, Musk proposed to merge OpenAI into Tesla. In an email in early February 2018, Musk suggested that OpenAI "attach itself to Tesla as its own cash cow," commenting that "Exactly right...Tesla is the only AI that even has hope The path to being on par with Google. And even then, the odds of going against Google are slim. But not zero."

After this plan also failed, Musk left OpenAI and sent a sarcastic email, "Even raising hundreds of millions of dollars is not enough. This requires raising tens of millions of dollars every year." Billion dollars, otherwise forget it." In addition, when fighting for control of OpenAI, he also stopped providing funds, resulting in employee salaries being unable to be paid on time. Therefore, OpenAI and Musk broke up in an unseemly manner.

Musk’s email suggesting that OpenAI be merged into Tesla

3. Closed source remains unchanged—OpenAI continues to move forward

In this prosecution, many netizens sided with Musk and came out to call for OpenAI to be open source. Conspiracy theories and panic about Q* and AGI have once again swept social media.

Behind the statement, OpenAI wrote somewhat evasively that the "open" of OpenAI is not the "open" of "open source", but the "open" of "open". "Open" means that after AI is built, everyone should benefit from the results of AI, but it is completely fine not to share scientific results...". OpenAI also provided in the statement how AI can help development China popularizes knowledge and increases income, and mentioned that Musk also agreed with their view of "openness".

It can be seen that OpenAI’s closed source is already a certainty. In fact, from the perspective of OpenAI, this statement is not unreasonable, but it is not sincere. Even Logan, the head of developer relations within OpenAI, expressed disappointment with the current situation after leaving OpenAI, although he explained that this was not a dig at the closed-source organization.

# In short, closed source causes the public to lose the right to supervise new technologies. Although humans can indeed benefit a lot from the achievements of artificial intelligence, who can guarantee that we will laugh until the day when Q* comes?

However, before that, let’s take a look at Musk’s reply.

The above is the detailed content of The follow-up is coming! OpenAI "linked" Musk to its official website, and multiple email exchanges were exposed. For more information, please follow other related articles on the PHP Chinese website!