


Why does converting 'interface{}' back to a slice result in extra heap allocation?
In PHP, converting the "interface{}" type to the slice type will result in additional heap allocation. This is because in PHP, an interface is an abstract data type, and a slice is a dynamic array type. When we convert an interface type to a slice type, PHP needs to allocate additional memory space for the slice type to store the elements of the slice. This additional heap allocation operation will cause additional memory overhead, which may cause performance issues for some memory-sensitive applications. Therefore, when performing type conversion, we should pay attention to this issue and try to avoid unnecessary additional heap allocation.
Question content
func benchmarkpool(b *testing.b) { b.reportallocs() p := sync.pool{new: func() interface{} { return make([]byte, 1024) }} for i := 0; i < b.n; i++ { bts := p.get().([]byte) p.put(bts) } }
This benchmark gives the following output in go1.19.5.
benchmarkpool benchmarkpool-10 47578498 24.47 ns/op 24 b/op 1 allocs/op
Things look different when using *[]byte
:
func benchmarkpool(b *testing.b) { b.reportallocs() p := sync.pool{new: func() interface{} { bts := make([]byte, 1024) return &bts }} for i := 0; i < b.n; i++ { bts := p.get().(*[]byte) p.put(bts) } }
BenchmarkPool BenchmarkPool-10 142008002 8.581 ns/op 0 B/op 0 allocs/op
It seems that converting interface{}
back to a slice results in additional heap allocations.
Why does go need this extra allocation? What are the design considerations behind this?
Solution
What causes the allocation is not the conversion of any
to []byte
, but the conversion of []byte
to Conversion of any
. p.Put(bts)
Implicitly converts the parameter bts
to any
before passing it to (*sync.Pool).Put
. The interface in GoGC 1.19 is implemented as a pair of pointers, one pointing to the type metadata and one pointing to the actual object, in this case the second pointer is escaped to the pool, causing the slice object to be allocated. This applies not only to slice types, but also to any other non-pointer type.
For pointers, such as *[]byte
, the compiler performs optimizations that place their values directly into the iface
structure, thus removing the when converting to an interface. *[]byte
Allocation of instances. Therefore, it is generally recommended to put pointers into a pool rather than the structure itself.
The above is the detailed content of Why does converting 'interface{}' back to a slice result in extra heap allocation?. For more information, please follow other related articles on the PHP Chinese website!

Golang is more suitable for high concurrency tasks, while Python has more advantages in flexibility. 1.Golang efficiently handles concurrency through goroutine and channel. 2. Python relies on threading and asyncio, which is affected by GIL, but provides multiple concurrency methods. The choice should be based on specific needs.

The performance differences between Golang and C are mainly reflected in memory management, compilation optimization and runtime efficiency. 1) Golang's garbage collection mechanism is convenient but may affect performance, 2) C's manual memory management and compiler optimization are more efficient in recursive computing.

ChooseGolangforhighperformanceandconcurrency,idealforbackendservicesandnetworkprogramming;selectPythonforrapiddevelopment,datascience,andmachinelearningduetoitsversatilityandextensivelibraries.

Golang and Python each have their own advantages: Golang is suitable for high performance and concurrent programming, while Python is suitable for data science and web development. Golang is known for its concurrency model and efficient performance, while Python is known for its concise syntax and rich library ecosystem.

In what aspects are Golang and Python easier to use and have a smoother learning curve? Golang is more suitable for high concurrency and high performance needs, and the learning curve is relatively gentle for developers with C language background. Python is more suitable for data science and rapid prototyping, and the learning curve is very smooth for beginners.

Golang and C each have their own advantages in performance competitions: 1) Golang is suitable for high concurrency and rapid development, and 2) C provides higher performance and fine-grained control. The selection should be based on project requirements and team technology stack.

Golang is suitable for rapid development and concurrent programming, while C is more suitable for projects that require extreme performance and underlying control. 1) Golang's concurrency model simplifies concurrency programming through goroutine and channel. 2) C's template programming provides generic code and performance optimization. 3) Golang's garbage collection is convenient but may affect performance. C's memory management is complex but the control is fine.

Goimpactsdevelopmentpositivelythroughspeed,efficiency,andsimplicity.1)Speed:Gocompilesquicklyandrunsefficiently,idealforlargeprojects.2)Efficiency:Itscomprehensivestandardlibraryreducesexternaldependencies,enhancingdevelopmentefficiency.3)Simplicity:


Hot AI Tools

Undresser.AI Undress
AI-powered app for creating realistic nude photos

AI Clothes Remover
Online AI tool for removing clothes from photos.

Undress AI Tool
Undress images for free

Clothoff.io
AI clothes remover

AI Hentai Generator
Generate AI Hentai for free.

Hot Article

Hot Tools

EditPlus Chinese cracked version
Small size, syntax highlighting, does not support code prompt function

WebStorm Mac version
Useful JavaScript development tools

Safe Exam Browser
Safe Exam Browser is a secure browser environment for taking online exams securely. This software turns any computer into a secure workstation. It controls access to any utility and prevents students from using unauthorized resources.

SublimeText3 English version
Recommended: Win version, supports code prompts!

Zend Studio 13.0.1
Powerful PHP integrated development environment