php editor Xiaoxin is here to introduce you to a little trick about folder operations - how to clear folders that only contain empty folders from the tree. In daily file management, we may encounter some folders that only contain empty folders. These folders occupy storage space but have no actual content. Through the following simple operations, we can easily clear these empty folders, free up valuable storage space, and improve the efficiency of file management.
Question content
I have one
type node struct { id string children []node }
I have a directory structure modeled after this slice. There may be multiple levels of folder structures in this directory, ending up with no files in it. See:ű
folder1/folder2/folder3/folder4 folder1/file1.txt
I want to clean those folders that only have empty folders. So, in this example, only one file will remain in folder1 and everything below will be deleted. But I can't seem to come up with a good idea for doing this. I could totally create a new tree without changing the original tree, but I don't know how to efficiently iterate through the tree and see if the last child has no children, then go back to the root and remove that child resulting in just an empty folder list. Any ideas will be welcome!
My initial solution only deletes the leaves and not the parent folder:
func removeChildlessFolders(original, tree []Node) []Node { for i, node := range original { if len(node.Children) == 0 { continue } dir := Node{} dir.Id = node.Id dir.Children = append(dir.Children, node.Children...) tree = append(tree, dir) removeChildlessFolders(original[i].Children, node.Children) } return tree }
Workaround
Good question first, but it will be difficult for others to reproduce the use case you have. From next time try to add reproducible code that people can use and quickly test their methods and give results. Like you've passed the root but how do you initialize it? If someone needs to help you, they need to build a relationship first. Generally speaking, this is inconvenient. Nonetheless, let's look at the solutions.
Directory Structure
Enter dir
test-folder ├── folder1 │ └── folder2 │ └── folder3 ├── folder4 │ ├── folder5 │ └── joker └── folder6 └── file.txt
expected outcome
test-folder └── folder6 └── file.txt
Node definition
First of all, I don't know how you create the directory tree. If you have it hardcoded then that's a different question, but the way n-ary
trees are usually populated, then you need to define node
with a self-referential pointer. Not an exact slice. So I would define nodes as follows
type node struct { id string children []*node }
Auxiliary methods
This is a helper method to check whether the path points to a directory
func ifdir(path string) bool { file, err := os.open(path) if err != nil { panic(err) } defer file.close() info, err := file.stat() if err != nil { panic(err) } if info.isdir() { return true } return false }
How to populate the tree
This is a simple iteration method using a queue
input n-ary tree
. Golang does not provide a queue implementation, but golang channels are actually just queues. I left it as 500
because we cannot create dynamic buffered channels in golang. IMHO, this number should work for almost all scenarios.
func buildtreefromdir(basedir string) *node { _, err := ioutil.readdir(basedir) if err != nil { return nil } root := &node{ id: basedir, } ////////// queue := make(chan *node, 500) // consider that there can not be any dir with > 500 depth queue <- root for { if len(queue) == 0 { break } data, ok := <-queue if ok { // iterate all the contents in the dir curdir := (*data).id if ifdir(curdir) { contents, _ := ioutil.readdir(curdir) data.children = make([]*node, len(contents)) for i, content := range contents { node := new(node) node.id = filepath.join(curdir, content.name()) data.children[i] = node if content.isdir() { queue <- node } } } } } return root }
Another auxiliary method
This just prints the directory tree. For debugging purposes only.
func printdirtree(root *node) { fmt.println(root.id) for _, each := range root.children { printdirtree(each) } if len(root.children) == 0 { fmt.println("===") } }
Finally your solution.
very simple. If you have any questions please let me know.
func recursiveemptydelete(root *node) { // if the current root is not pointing to any dir if root == nil { return } for _, each := range root.children { recursiveemptydelete(each) } if !ifdir(root.id) { return } else if content, _ := ioutil.readdir(root.id); len(content) != 0 { return } os.remove(root.id) }
Here is main()
func main() { root := buildTreeFromDir("test-folder") printDirTree(root) recursiveEmptyDelete(root) }
The above is the detailed content of Clear folders from tree that contain only empty folders. For more information, please follow other related articles on the PHP Chinese website!

Golang is more suitable for high concurrency tasks, while Python has more advantages in flexibility. 1.Golang efficiently handles concurrency through goroutine and channel. 2. Python relies on threading and asyncio, which is affected by GIL, but provides multiple concurrency methods. The choice should be based on specific needs.

The performance differences between Golang and C are mainly reflected in memory management, compilation optimization and runtime efficiency. 1) Golang's garbage collection mechanism is convenient but may affect performance, 2) C's manual memory management and compiler optimization are more efficient in recursive computing.

ChooseGolangforhighperformanceandconcurrency,idealforbackendservicesandnetworkprogramming;selectPythonforrapiddevelopment,datascience,andmachinelearningduetoitsversatilityandextensivelibraries.

Golang and Python each have their own advantages: Golang is suitable for high performance and concurrent programming, while Python is suitable for data science and web development. Golang is known for its concurrency model and efficient performance, while Python is known for its concise syntax and rich library ecosystem.

In what aspects are Golang and Python easier to use and have a smoother learning curve? Golang is more suitable for high concurrency and high performance needs, and the learning curve is relatively gentle for developers with C language background. Python is more suitable for data science and rapid prototyping, and the learning curve is very smooth for beginners.

Golang and C each have their own advantages in performance competitions: 1) Golang is suitable for high concurrency and rapid development, and 2) C provides higher performance and fine-grained control. The selection should be based on project requirements and team technology stack.

Golang is suitable for rapid development and concurrent programming, while C is more suitable for projects that require extreme performance and underlying control. 1) Golang's concurrency model simplifies concurrency programming through goroutine and channel. 2) C's template programming provides generic code and performance optimization. 3) Golang's garbage collection is convenient but may affect performance. C's memory management is complex but the control is fine.

Goimpactsdevelopmentpositivelythroughspeed,efficiency,andsimplicity.1)Speed:Gocompilesquicklyandrunsefficiently,idealforlargeprojects.2)Efficiency:Itscomprehensivestandardlibraryreducesexternaldependencies,enhancingdevelopmentefficiency.3)Simplicity:


Hot AI Tools

Undresser.AI Undress
AI-powered app for creating realistic nude photos

AI Clothes Remover
Online AI tool for removing clothes from photos.

Undress AI Tool
Undress images for free

Clothoff.io
AI clothes remover

AI Hentai Generator
Generate AI Hentai for free.

Hot Article

Hot Tools

ZendStudio 13.5.1 Mac
Powerful PHP integrated development environment

DVWA
Damn Vulnerable Web App (DVWA) is a PHP/MySQL web application that is very vulnerable. Its main goals are to be an aid for security professionals to test their skills and tools in a legal environment, to help web developers better understand the process of securing web applications, and to help teachers/students teach/learn in a classroom environment Web application security. The goal of DVWA is to practice some of the most common web vulnerabilities through a simple and straightforward interface, with varying degrees of difficulty. Please note that this software

SublimeText3 English version
Recommended: Win version, supports code prompts!

WebStorm Mac version
Useful JavaScript development tools

SublimeText3 Linux new version
SublimeText3 Linux latest version