php editor Apple introduces you how to efficiently delete elements from slices in Go. In the Go language, deleting elements in a slice is a common operation. However, due to the characteristics of slices, directly deleting an element may cause the length of the slice to change, thus affecting subsequent operations. In order to efficiently delete elements in a slice, we can use the characteristics of the slice and some built-in functions to achieve this. Several commonly used methods will be introduced in detail below.
Question content
There are multiple ways to delete slice elements. But what if I have an application that does a lot of processing of slices? Go slices are well optimized for adding new elements, but is there an efficient way to remove elements from a slice (not only for speed, but also memory optimized).
I'm aware of the slices.Delete function introduced in Go 1.21, but behind the scenes it uses the following well-known techniques:
return append(s[:i], s[j:]...)
It looks like the underlying array is not reduced in this case. This is great for speed, but what if we have a lot of elements (like 100k or 1M) and then reduce them to very few (like only 10)? It looks like there are no memory optimizations like those used to increase slice capacity.
When we don't need to preserve the order of elements in a slice, we can use the following method (go to playground link):
func sliceDel[S ~[]E, E any](s S, i, j int) S { lastIdx := len(s) - (j - i) copy(s[i:], s[lastIdx:]) return s[:lastIdx] }
This is useful when we have a large slice and a small number of elements to remove (the idea behind it is to copy a small number of slice elements).
Regarding memory, the capacity is the same in both cases and will not be reduced. For example:
// Reduce slice almost to zero for i := 0; i < sliceSize/2-1; i++ { sl = sliceDel(sl, 0, 2) } fmt.Printf("len = %d, cap = %d", len(sl), cap(sl)) // Output: len = 2, cap = 100000 // Reduce slice almost to zero for i := 0; i < sliceSize/2-1; i++ { sl = slices.Delete(sl, 0, 2) } fmt.Printf("len = %d, cap = %d", len(sl), cap(sl)) // Output: len = 2, cap = 100000
So, is there any way to optimize memory usage? For example, if the length of a slice is less than half its capacity, reduce the capacity by half.
I would also like to know how to do this efficiently, for example a technique like this s[:len(s):len(s)]
(full slice expression used by slices.Clip) does not would reduce the underlying array - it only holds the new capacity in the slice structure to avoid overwriting the parent slice element when appending a new element to a child slice (as mentioned in this proposal).
Solution
There is no "generally best" solution. You show multiple approaches in your question, each approach may be better than the others for a specific scenario.
If you encounter a situation like this, when you want to keep a few elements out of many, don't even start removing those elements. Build a new slice with these elements. In addition to being faster, this definitely solves the memory issue as well.
You cannot reduce memory usage by using full slice expressions other than allocating and using new slices. As long as there is a reference to the backing array, it will not shrink (at least not in current versions of Go). If you encounter a situation where a large backing array is allocated but only a small portion of it is used, you can allocate a new slice and manually copy the elements to allow the large array to be garbage collected.
Also consider that if you have a large slice that you may need to remove many elements from, a slice may not be the best data structure to use. For example, you could try using a linked list, or you could even try a map: deleting elements from a linked list or a map will be much faster, and a map will also provide a fast (O(n)
) lookup time, as shown below Bar.
The above is the detailed content of How to efficiently remove elements from a slice in Go?. For more information, please follow other related articles on the PHP Chinese website!

Golang is suitable for rapid development and concurrent programming, while C is more suitable for projects that require extreme performance and underlying control. 1) Golang's concurrency model simplifies concurrency programming through goroutine and channel. 2) C's template programming provides generic code and performance optimization. 3) Golang's garbage collection is convenient but may affect performance. C's memory management is complex but the control is fine.

Goimpactsdevelopmentpositivelythroughspeed,efficiency,andsimplicity.1)Speed:Gocompilesquicklyandrunsefficiently,idealforlargeprojects.2)Efficiency:Itscomprehensivestandardlibraryreducesexternaldependencies,enhancingdevelopmentefficiency.3)Simplicity:

C is more suitable for scenarios where direct control of hardware resources and high performance optimization is required, while Golang is more suitable for scenarios where rapid development and high concurrency processing are required. 1.C's advantage lies in its close to hardware characteristics and high optimization capabilities, which are suitable for high-performance needs such as game development. 2.Golang's advantage lies in its concise syntax and natural concurrency support, which is suitable for high concurrency service development.

Golang excels in practical applications and is known for its simplicity, efficiency and concurrency. 1) Concurrent programming is implemented through Goroutines and Channels, 2) Flexible code is written using interfaces and polymorphisms, 3) Simplify network programming with net/http packages, 4) Build efficient concurrent crawlers, 5) Debugging and optimizing through tools and best practices.

The core features of Go include garbage collection, static linking and concurrency support. 1. The concurrency model of Go language realizes efficient concurrent programming through goroutine and channel. 2. Interfaces and polymorphisms are implemented through interface methods, so that different types can be processed in a unified manner. 3. The basic usage demonstrates the efficiency of function definition and call. 4. In advanced usage, slices provide powerful functions of dynamic resizing. 5. Common errors such as race conditions can be detected and resolved through getest-race. 6. Performance optimization Reuse objects through sync.Pool to reduce garbage collection pressure.

Go language performs well in building efficient and scalable systems. Its advantages include: 1. High performance: compiled into machine code, fast running speed; 2. Concurrent programming: simplify multitasking through goroutines and channels; 3. Simplicity: concise syntax, reducing learning and maintenance costs; 4. Cross-platform: supports cross-platform compilation, easy deployment.

Confused about the sorting of SQL query results. In the process of learning SQL, you often encounter some confusing problems. Recently, the author is reading "MICK-SQL Basics"...

The relationship between technology stack convergence and technology selection In software development, the selection and management of technology stacks are a very critical issue. Recently, some readers have proposed...


Hot AI Tools

Undresser.AI Undress
AI-powered app for creating realistic nude photos

AI Clothes Remover
Online AI tool for removing clothes from photos.

Undress AI Tool
Undress images for free

Clothoff.io
AI clothes remover

AI Hentai Generator
Generate AI Hentai for free.

Hot Article

Hot Tools

MantisBT
Mantis is an easy-to-deploy web-based defect tracking tool designed to aid in product defect tracking. It requires PHP, MySQL and a web server. Check out our demo and hosting services.

ZendStudio 13.5.1 Mac
Powerful PHP integrated development environment

Dreamweaver CS6
Visual web development tools

SublimeText3 English version
Recommended: Win version, supports code prompts!

SublimeText3 Linux new version
SublimeText3 Linux latest version