


Emily M. Bender, a professor at the University of Washington and Vice Chairman of the ACL 2023 Conference, caused a huge controversy with her remarks a few days ago
arXiv has ruined the research atmosphere, then What are we brushing every day? Boaz Barak, a professor at Harvard University, said that arXiv has done much more to promote scientific progress and expand scientific participation than all anonymous interventions. Any policy that hinders arXiv is not only stupid, but also undermines scientific progress and inclusion. Sex has the opposite effect
Deep learning giant Yann LeCun supported his views
The discussion about Emily Bender’s views is actually not completely unreasonable . After all, arXiv is a platform with almost no review: if you submit a manuscript to an academic conference or journal, the author will remain anonymous during the review period, but on arXiv people always involuntarily follow big-name research institutions and scholars. However, since what happened yesterday, the direction of the discussion has completely shifted to one side
In order to understand the ins and outs of the matter, we need to first take a look at the ACL paper that caused an uproar in the AI community yesterday. Rejection incident
Naomi Saphra, a postdoctoral fellow at New York University (studying with Kyunghyun Cho) posted on X on September 4, saying that her paper had just been rejected by ACL, the top international conference in the field of natural language processing. This was her first conference paper submission with students, and she had previously told the first author that top conferences on natural language processing were more user-friendly than machine learning conferences. During the review period, the first author spent a lot of time to refute, and the experimental results also supported the point of view of the paper
However, the most important thing is that the reason why she was rejected was because she was under the anonymity policy The paper was submitted to arXiv after the deadline
Naomi Saphra said that the ACL policy has caused harm to new researchers and caused the conference to deviate from the original intention of the field of natural language processing
There has been a long-standing controversy over AI’s ban on publicizing papers during review. Nowadays, in the AI circle, many people are accustomed to staring at the preprint paper platform arXiv every day, because this platform is updated every day. In contrast, research releases at the annual top conference are much slower
In the field of AI, if you don’t read the news, you will fall behind
After Naomi Saphra complained, people began to criticize the current order The annoying AI conference policy
Sebastian Raschka, a well-known machine learning researcher and assistant professor at the University of Wisconsin-Madison, conducted some research. He pointed out that the rejection of this paper was not due to missing the conference paper submission. The deadline was a few minutes, but because it was submitted a few minutes late to an optional third-party preprint paper platform. What's going on?
Previously they didn't allow people to discuss their arxiv version of the paper online, now can they also limit when people can upload to arxiv?
Sebastian Raschka found the review policy specifically as follows: At ACL 2023, papers submitted through direct methods have an anonymity period and are not allowed to be published in preprints Signatures are made public on the paper platform. The times specified on arXiv refer to the time of submission, not the time of publication on arXiv. The review policy discovered by Sebastian Raschka is specifically this: at ACL 2023, papers submitted through direct submission will have an anonymity period and will not be allowed to be publicly signed on the preprint paper platform. The designated time refers to the time of submission on arXiv, not the public time on arXiv
Gautam Kamath, a professor at the University of Gaotielu, also said, I think this policy is very stupid, and In actual implementation, the situation was worse than imagined
Now that he has set a deadline for uploading to arXiv, papers by Naomi Saphra and others were rejected because they missed this time. You see, he has now set a deadline for you to upload to arXiv. It is because of missing this time that the paper of Naomi Saphra and others was rejected

We are currently in the era of large models, and competition in the NLP field has become extremely fierce. The careers of many young researchers depend on displaying their work on high-visibility platforms in the hope of getting more citations. However, the current practices of top artificial intelligence conferences are contrary to this
According to the original intention of conferences such as ACL, it is obviously to promote academic exchanges and promote the development of advanced research. However, the painful policy has even made people question the authority of the conference itself

PhD student Fu Yao said, I participated in two conferences, ACL and ICML, this year, and there is a sharp contrast between the two. The content of ACL 2023 is basically more than a year out of date, while the content of ICML is full of prospects for the future. If the younger generation of natural language processing researchers wants to have a future, they should submit their articles to NeurIPS/ICLR/ICML
Someone mentioned that the regulations that led to the rejection of Saphra's paper date back to 2017 . Compared with the rapid development of AI technology, the development of rules for AI conferences seems to be relatively slow.
Interestingly, ACL has not actually changed very slowly. Since 2022, ACL has launched a mechanism called "rolling review", namely ACL Rolling Review (ARR), which is similar to the review process of journals. Recently, ACL has revised its regulations. The 2024 conference will completely cancel direct submission. Everyone can only choose to submit ARR papers.
Previously, papers submitted directly to the ACL conference It can be processed according to the regular review process: a paper will be reviewed by 3 or more reviewers, and the author can submit a reply to respond to the review comments. Once the paper is accepted, the author can edit the final draft
Under the ARR mechanism, submitted papers will be processed by the Senior Area Chair (SAC). The author can provide a reply, but cannot modify the paper. The paper needs to obtain all review comments and comprehensive review comments (meta-review) and submit it to ACL before the deadline. The content cannot be modified, but the author's reply can be attached. Once submitted to ACL, it cannot be modified and submitted to ARR again (unless the conference gives an acceptance result)
According to the current trend, ACL will continue to develop in the direction of multiple rounds of reviews in the future to be more Close to the standards of academic journals
Currently we have not found a solution to balance high-quality research and rigorous and fair review speed. Although rolling review has tried its best, it still cannot compare with the speed of arXiv
The following is the reference content:
Please click the following link to view detailed information about the 2023 ACL Main Conference: https://2023.aclweb.org/calls/main_conference/
The above is the detailed content of Netizens condemned ACL chairman for publicly criticizing arXiv and suggested considering other top conferences. For more information, please follow other related articles on the PHP Chinese website!

Laravel入门教程:从零开始学习最流行的PHP框架引言:Laravel是当前最流行的PHP框架之一,它易于上手、功能强大且拥有活跃的开发社区。本文将带您从零开始学习Laravel框架,并提供一些实例代码,帮助您更好地理解和掌握这个强大的工具。第一步:安装Laravel在开始之前,您需要在计算机上安装Laravel框架。最简单的方法是通过Composer进

Vue.js是一款流行的JavaScript前端框架,目前已经推出了最新的版本——Vue3,新版Vue在性能、体积以及开发体验上均有所提升,受到越来越多的开发者欢迎。本文将介绍如何使用Vue3制作一个简单的图片裁剪器。首先,我们需要创建一个Vue项目并安装所需的插件。可以使用VueCLI来创建项目,也可以手动搭建。这里我们以使用VueCLI的方式为例:#

Go-zero是一款优秀的Go语言框架,它提供了一整套解决方案,包括RPC、缓存、定时任务等功能。事实上,使用go-zero建立一个高性能的服务非常简单,甚至可以在数小时内从入门到精通。本文旨在介绍使用go-zero框架构建高性能服务的过程,并帮助读者快速掌握该框架的核心概念。一、安装和配置在开始使用go-zero之前,我们需要安装它并配置一些必要的环境。1

快速入门:使用Go语言函数实现简单的数据可视化功能随着数据的快速增长和复杂性的提高,数据可视化成为了数据分析和数据表达的重要手段。在数据可视化中,我们需要使用合适的工具和技术来将数据转化为易读且易理解的图表或图形。Go语言作为一种高效且易于使用的编程语言,在数据科学领域也有着广泛的应用。本文将介绍如何使用Go语言函数来实现简单的数据可视化功能。我们将使用Go

随着科技的不断发展,人脸识别技术也越来越得到了广泛的应用。而在Web开发领域中,PHP是一种被广泛采用的技术,因此PHP中的人脸识别技术也备受关注。本文将介绍PHP中的人脸识别入门指南,帮助初学者快速掌握这一领域。一、什么是人脸识别技术人脸识别技术是一种基于计算机视觉技术的生物特征识别技术,其主要应用领域包括安防、金融、电商等。人脸识别技术的核心就是对人脸进

Beego是一个基于Go语言的开发框架,它提供了一套完整的Web开发工具链,包括路由、模板引擎、ORM等。如果你想快速入门Beego开发框架,以下是一些简单易懂的步骤和建议。第一步:安装Beego和Bee工具安装Beego和Bee工具是开始学习Beego的第一步。你可以在Beego官网上找到详细的安装步骤,也可以使用以下命令来安装:gogetgithub

Laravel是一个流行的PHP框架,它提供了许多工具和功能,以使开发Web应用程序变得更加轻松和快速。Laravel8已经发布,它带来了许多新的功能和改进。在本文中,我们将学习如何快速入门Laravel8。安装Laravel8要安装Laravel8,您需要满足以下要求:PHP>=7.3MySQL>=5.6或MariaDB>=10.

PHP摄像头调用教程:快速入门指南引言:在当今的数字时代,摄像头成为了人们生活中不可或缺的设备之一。在Web开发中,如何通过PHP调用摄像头,实现视频流的显示和处理,成为了很多开发者关注的问题。本文将为大家介绍如何快速入门使用PHP来调用摄像头。一、环境准备要使用PHP调用摄像头,我们需要准备以下环境:PHP:确保已经安装了PHP,并且安装了相应的扩展库,如


Hot AI Tools

Undresser.AI Undress
AI-powered app for creating realistic nude photos

AI Clothes Remover
Online AI tool for removing clothes from photos.

Undress AI Tool
Undress images for free

Clothoff.io
AI clothes remover

AI Hentai Generator
Generate AI Hentai for free.

Hot Article

Hot Tools

PhpStorm Mac version
The latest (2018.2.1) professional PHP integrated development tool

Atom editor mac version download
The most popular open source editor

ZendStudio 13.5.1 Mac
Powerful PHP integrated development environment

SAP NetWeaver Server Adapter for Eclipse
Integrate Eclipse with SAP NetWeaver application server.

EditPlus Chinese cracked version
Small size, syntax highlighting, does not support code prompt function
