Home >Technology peripherals >AI >A robot worth $100,000 VS a worker with a monthly salary of $3,000, which one is more cost-effective?
In order not to be eliminated, I have recently been crazy about short video editing and video copywriting. Because of this, I came into contact with various intelligent cultural and creative products, as well as one-click AI workplace gadgets
Whether it is the high-end pseudo-original work of Zhiyuyu or the pseudo-original copywriting of secondary intellectual creation, it is quite shocking. Many second-time pseudo-original manuscripts are really comparable to a real person's pseudo-original work. With slight modifications to the sentences and logic, it can be used for publishing various types of content without being recognized as plagiarism by the platform.
From this perspective, AI intelligent tools are really easy to use. A few years ago, I worked as a writer on a platform, revising papers, product descriptions, and other speeches. Every time after writing, the boss will check it using duplication checking software. If the repetition rate is too high, it needs to be rewritten. At that time, in order to earn some extra money based on the billing rate per thousand words, I often started working as soon as I got off work, eating pancakes and thinking about how to cleverly change other people's original content into my own. After each completion, when the boss settles the payment and arrives in the account, there will be a feeling of successfully stealing something
At that time, my salary was too low to meet my living needs. I started thinking about finding some part-time jobs to make extra money because the monthly phone bill was stressing me out. While I know it's bad to fake original content, I have to do it in order to make a living. Later, I found a new job with a higher salary, so I gave up this small job for extra income
Thinking back to the miserable self before, and looking at this advanced pseudo-original robot tool, wow, human wisdom is really amazing
After resigning, I have been working from home online and holding multiple part-time jobs. After using smart gadgets, I am really efficient. In the past two days, colleagues working remotely have all used robot gadgets. Most of them are lamenting how happy and boring humans will be when robots take over their jobs!
When humans use robotic tools, some people will inevitably lose their jobs. Under such circumstances, the unemployment problem will become more serious and worrying. Just when everyone is anxious about their future livelihood, someone raised a question: Do the robots you use need to be purchased annually? The price seems high, would anyone choose to purchase it on an annual basis? Is the payment borne by the individual?
Hearing this, everyone seems to be relieved. At least for now, there is no possibility of robots replacing human work. After all, at this stage, robots are still too expensive. If it works continuously for dozens of hours and breaks the ball, it will be costly to pay for repairs and subsequent maintenance. But it's different for a 3,000-yuan migrant worker. If you stay up all night continuously and your body breaks down and you feel uncomfortable, you have to spend your own money to go to the hospital. If you ask for leave, your boss can deduct another amount of money from you.
So, compared with a robot worth $100,000 or a worker with a monthly salary of $3,000, which one is more cost-effective? No wonder the current factory configuration is mostly half robots and half personnel. This mutual cooperation can ensure cost reduction while maximizing profits
The above is the detailed content of A robot worth $100,000 VS a worker with a monthly salary of $3,000, which one is more cost-effective?. For more information, please follow other related articles on the PHP Chinese website!