search
HomeBackend DevelopmentGolangHow to solve the problem of concurrent cache access in Go language?

How to solve the problem of concurrent cache access in Go language?

Oct 08, 2023 pm 05:15 PM
mutex (mutex lock) in go languagechannel in go languagewaitgroup (wait group) in go language

How to solve the problem of concurrent cache access in Go language?

How to solve the problem of concurrent cache access in Go language?

In concurrent programming, caching is a commonly used optimization strategy. By caching data, frequent access to underlying storage can be reduced and system performance improved. However, in multiple concurrent access scenarios, concurrent cache access problems are often encountered, such as cache competition, cache penetration, etc. This article will introduce how to solve the problem of concurrent cache access in Go language and provide specific code examples.

  1. Using mutex locks
    Mutex locks are one of the most commonly used methods to solve concurrent cache access problems. By locking before and after read and write operations, it can be ensured that only one thread can modify the cache at the same time. The following is a sample code that uses a mutex lock to solve the problem of concurrent cache access:
package main

import (
    "fmt"
    "sync"
)

var cache map[string]string
var mutex sync.Mutex

func main() {
    cache = make(map[string]string)

    var wg sync.WaitGroup
    for i := 0; i < 10; i++ {
        wg.Add(1)
        go func(index int) {
            defer wg.Done()

            key := fmt.Sprintf("key-%d", index)
            value, ok := getFromCache(key)
            if ok {
                fmt.Printf("Read from cache: %s -> %s
", key, value)
            } else {
                value = expensiveCalculation(key)
                setToCache(key, value)
                fmt.Printf("Write to cache: %s -> %s
", key, value)
            }
        }(i)
    }

    wg.Wait()
}

func getFromCache(key string) (string, bool) {
    mutex.Lock()
    defer mutex.Unlock()

    value, ok := cache[key]
    return value, ok
}

func setToCache(key string, value string) {
    mutex.Lock()
    defer mutex.Unlock()

    cache[key] = value
}

func expensiveCalculation(key string) string {
    // 模拟耗时操作
    return fmt.Sprintf("value-%s", key)
}

In the above code, we are before and after the getFromCache and setToCache operations The addition of a mutex lock ensures that only one thread can read and write to the cache at the same time, thus solving the problem of concurrent cache access.

  1. Using read-write locks
    The disadvantage of the mutex lock is that it blocks both read operations and write operations, resulting in poor concurrency performance. Using read-write locks allows multiple threads to read the cache at the same time, but only one thread can perform write operations, improving concurrency performance. The following is a sample code that uses read-write locks to solve concurrent cache access problems:
package main

import (
    "fmt"
    "sync"
)

var cache map[string]string
var rwmutex sync.RWMutex

func main() {
    cache = make(map[string]string)

    var wg sync.WaitGroup
    for i := 0; i < 10; i++ {
        wg.Add(1)
        go func(index int) {
            defer wg.Done()

            key := fmt.Sprintf("key-%d", index)
            value, ok := getFromCache(key)
            if ok {
                fmt.Printf("Read from cache: %s -> %s
", key, value)
            } else {
                value = expensiveCalculation(key)
                setToCache(key, value)
                fmt.Printf("Write to cache: %s -> %s
", key, value)
            }
        }(i)
    }

    wg.Wait()
}

func getFromCache(key string) (string, bool) {
    rwmutex.RLock()
    defer rwmutex.RUnlock()

    value, ok := cache[key]
    return value, ok
}

func setToCache(key string, value string) {
    rwmutex.Lock()
    defer rwmutex.Unlock()

    cache[key] = value
}

func expensiveCalculation(key string) string {
    // 模拟耗时操作
    return fmt.Sprintf("value-%s", key)
}

In the above code, we use read-write locks sync.RWMutex, before and after the read operation A read lock RLock is added, and a write lock Lock is added before and after the write operation, so that we can allow multiple threads to read the cache at the same time, but only one thread can perform write operations. This improves concurrency performance.

By using mutex locks or read-write locks, we can effectively solve the concurrent cache access problem in Go language. In actual applications, the appropriate lock mechanism can be selected according to specific needs to ensure the security and performance of concurrent access.

(word count: 658)

The above is the detailed content of How to solve the problem of concurrent cache access in Go language?. For more information, please follow other related articles on the PHP Chinese website!

Statement
The content of this article is voluntarily contributed by netizens, and the copyright belongs to the original author. This site does not assume corresponding legal responsibility. If you find any content suspected of plagiarism or infringement, please contact admin@php.cn
Choosing Between Golang and Python: The Right Fit for Your ProjectChoosing Between Golang and Python: The Right Fit for Your ProjectApr 19, 2025 am 12:21 AM

Golangisidealforperformance-criticalapplicationsandconcurrentprogramming,whilePythonexcelsindatascience,rapidprototyping,andversatility.1)Forhigh-performanceneeds,chooseGolangduetoitsefficiencyandconcurrencyfeatures.2)Fordata-drivenprojects,Pythonisp

Golang: Concurrency and Performance in ActionGolang: Concurrency and Performance in ActionApr 19, 2025 am 12:20 AM

Golang achieves efficient concurrency through goroutine and channel: 1.goroutine is a lightweight thread, started with the go keyword; 2.channel is used for secure communication between goroutines to avoid race conditions; 3. The usage example shows basic and advanced usage; 4. Common errors include deadlocks and data competition, which can be detected by gorun-race; 5. Performance optimization suggests reducing the use of channel, reasonably setting the number of goroutines, and using sync.Pool to manage memory.

Golang vs. Python: Which Language Should You Learn?Golang vs. Python: Which Language Should You Learn?Apr 19, 2025 am 12:20 AM

Golang is more suitable for system programming and high concurrency applications, while Python is more suitable for data science and rapid development. 1) Golang is developed by Google, statically typing, emphasizing simplicity and efficiency, and is suitable for high concurrency scenarios. 2) Python is created by Guidovan Rossum, dynamically typed, concise syntax, wide application, suitable for beginners and data processing.

Golang vs. Python: Performance and ScalabilityGolang vs. Python: Performance and ScalabilityApr 19, 2025 am 12:18 AM

Golang is better than Python in terms of performance and scalability. 1) Golang's compilation-type characteristics and efficient concurrency model make it perform well in high concurrency scenarios. 2) Python, as an interpreted language, executes slowly, but can optimize performance through tools such as Cython.

Golang vs. Other Languages: A ComparisonGolang vs. Other Languages: A ComparisonApr 19, 2025 am 12:11 AM

Go language has unique advantages in concurrent programming, performance, learning curve, etc.: 1. Concurrent programming is realized through goroutine and channel, which is lightweight and efficient. 2. The compilation speed is fast and the operation performance is close to that of C language. 3. The grammar is concise, the learning curve is smooth, and the ecosystem is rich.

Golang and Python: Understanding the DifferencesGolang and Python: Understanding the DifferencesApr 18, 2025 am 12:21 AM

The main differences between Golang and Python are concurrency models, type systems, performance and execution speed. 1. Golang uses the CSP model, which is suitable for high concurrent tasks; Python relies on multi-threading and GIL, which is suitable for I/O-intensive tasks. 2. Golang is a static type, and Python is a dynamic type. 3. Golang compiled language execution speed is fast, and Python interpreted language development is fast.

Golang vs. C  : Assessing the Speed DifferenceGolang vs. C : Assessing the Speed DifferenceApr 18, 2025 am 12:20 AM

Golang is usually slower than C, but Golang has more advantages in concurrent programming and development efficiency: 1) Golang's garbage collection and concurrency model makes it perform well in high concurrency scenarios; 2) C obtains higher performance through manual memory management and hardware optimization, but has higher development complexity.

Golang: A Key Language for Cloud Computing and DevOpsGolang: A Key Language for Cloud Computing and DevOpsApr 18, 2025 am 12:18 AM

Golang is widely used in cloud computing and DevOps, and its advantages lie in simplicity, efficiency and concurrent programming capabilities. 1) In cloud computing, Golang efficiently handles concurrent requests through goroutine and channel mechanisms. 2) In DevOps, Golang's fast compilation and cross-platform features make it the first choice for automation tools.

See all articles

Hot AI Tools

Undresser.AI Undress

Undresser.AI Undress

AI-powered app for creating realistic nude photos

AI Clothes Remover

AI Clothes Remover

Online AI tool for removing clothes from photos.

Undress AI Tool

Undress AI Tool

Undress images for free

Clothoff.io

Clothoff.io

AI clothes remover

Video Face Swap

Video Face Swap

Swap faces in any video effortlessly with our completely free AI face swap tool!

Hot Tools

Atom editor mac version download

Atom editor mac version download

The most popular open source editor

SublimeText3 Linux new version

SublimeText3 Linux new version

SublimeText3 Linux latest version

SublimeText3 Mac version

SublimeText3 Mac version

God-level code editing software (SublimeText3)

SublimeText3 English version

SublimeText3 English version

Recommended: Win version, supports code prompts!

SAP NetWeaver Server Adapter for Eclipse

SAP NetWeaver Server Adapter for Eclipse

Integrate Eclipse with SAP NetWeaver application server.