


CSS3 Animation vs jQuery Comparison: Choosing the Technology That Suits Your Project Needs
Introduction:
In front-end development, animation effects are the most important way to enhance the user experience An important part of the experience. In the past, developers mainly used jQuery to implement animation effects on the page. However, with the development of CSS3, it provides powerful animation functions, making it possible to use pure CSS to achieve animation effects. This article will compare CSS3 animations and jQuery and discuss how to choose the technology that suits your project needs.
1. CSS3 animation
- Introduction:
CSS3 animation is to define different stages of animation by using the @keyframes rules of CSS, and through CSS Properties to specify the style of each stage. CSS3 animations are relatively new, but are widely supported by major browsers.
- Advantages:
(1) Excellent performance: CSS3 animation is processed by the browser itself, so the execution efficiency is higher and complex animation effects can be realized more smoothly. .
(2) Good compatibility: Although there are differences in the compatibility of CSS3 animations in different browsers, most modern browsers support this technology.
(3) Less code: Compared with using JavaScript and jQuery to achieve animation effects, CSS3 provides a simpler way, reducing the amount of code and development time.
- Sample code:
The following is a sample code for a gradient displacement effect using CSS3 animation:
@keyframes move { 0% {opacity: 0; transform: translateX(-100px);} 100% {opacity: 1; transform: translateX(0px);} } .element { animation: move 1s ease-out; }
2. jQuery animation
- Introduction:
jQuery is a popular JavaScript library that provides rich animation and effect functions. Various animation effects can be achieved by setting and manipulating CSS properties of DOM elements. .
- Advantages:
(1) Strong reliability: jQuery has been around for a long time, is widely used and has received a lot of testing and optimization, so it works well in different browsers has good compatibility.
(2) Flexibility: Using jQuery animation, you can control the animation effect more accurately, adjust the speed, duration, callback function, etc. of the animation.
(3) Rich functions: jQuery provides a wealth of animation effects and methods, such as fade in and fade out, sliding, zooming, etc., which can meet various complex animation needs.
- Sample code:
The following is a sample code for the gradient displacement effect implemented using jQuery:
$(".element").animate({ opacity: 1, left: "+=100px" }, 1000);
3. How to choose the one that suits the project needs Technology
- Animation complexity:
For simple animation effects, such as gradients, displacements, etc., CSS3 animation can be implemented more concisely and efficiently. For complex animation effects, such as chain animation, timeline animation, etc., using jQuery may be more flexible and convenient.
- Compatibility requirements:
If the project needs to maintain compatibility in older browsers, especially in IE browser, using jQuery animation may be more appropriate , because of its broad compatibility.
- Performance Optimization:
For projects that require high performance, especially on mobile devices, using CSS3 animation can reduce resource consumption and improve page loading speed and rendering efficiency. .
Summary:
When choosing CSS3 animation and jQuery animation, factors such as animation complexity, compatibility, and performance need to be comprehensively considered based on project requirements. For simple animation effects and projects with high performance requirements, using CSS3 animation is a good choice; for complex animation effects and projects that need to maintain compatibility, using jQuery animation is more suitable. According to different needs, appropriate technology can be flexibly selected to achieve animation effects in actual development.
Reference link:
- CSS Animations: https://www.w3schools.com/css/css3_animations.asp
- jQuery.animate(): https: //api.jquery.com/animate/
The above is the detailed content of CSS3 Animation vs. jQuery: Choose the Technology That Fits Your Project Needs. For more information, please follow other related articles on the PHP Chinese website!

实现方法:1、用“$("img").delay(毫秒数).fadeOut()”语句,delay()设置延迟秒数;2、用“setTimeout(function(){ $("img").hide(); },毫秒值);”语句,通过定时器来延迟。

区别:1、axios是一个异步请求框架,用于封装底层的XMLHttpRequest,而jquery是一个JavaScript库,只是顺便封装了dom操作;2、axios是基于承诺对象的,可以用承诺对象中的方法,而jquery不基于承诺对象。

修改方法:1、用css()设置新样式,语法“$(元素).css("min-height","新值")”;2、用attr(),通过设置style属性来添加新样式,语法“$(元素).attr("style","min-height:新值")”。

增加元素的方法:1、用append(),语法“$("body").append(新元素)”,可向body内部的末尾处增加元素;2、用prepend(),语法“$("body").prepend(新元素)”,可向body内部的开始处增加元素。

删除方法:1、用empty(),语法“$("div").empty();”,可删除所有子节点和内容;2、用children()和remove(),语法“$("div").children().remove();”,只删除子元素,不删除内容。

在jquery中,apply()方法用于改变this指向,使用另一个对象替换当前对象,是应用某一对象的一个方法,语法为“apply(thisobj,[argarray])”;参数argarray表示的是以数组的形式进行传递。

去掉方法:1、用“$(selector).removeAttr("readonly")”语句删除readonly属性;2、用“$(selector).attr("readonly",false)”将readonly属性的值设置为false。

on()方法有4个参数:1、第一个参数不可省略,规定要从被选元素添加的一个或多个事件或命名空间;2、第二个参数可省略,规定元素的事件处理程序;3、第三个参数可省略,规定传递到函数的额外数据;4、第四个参数可省略,规定当事件发生时运行的函数。


Hot AI Tools

Undresser.AI Undress
AI-powered app for creating realistic nude photos

AI Clothes Remover
Online AI tool for removing clothes from photos.

Undress AI Tool
Undress images for free

Clothoff.io
AI clothes remover

AI Hentai Generator
Generate AI Hentai for free.

Hot Article

Hot Tools

SublimeText3 Mac version
God-level code editing software (SublimeText3)

Dreamweaver CS6
Visual web development tools

ZendStudio 13.5.1 Mac
Powerful PHP integrated development environment

Safe Exam Browser
Safe Exam Browser is a secure browser environment for taking online exams securely. This software turns any computer into a secure workstation. It controls access to any utility and prevents students from using unauthorized resources.

PhpStorm Mac version
The latest (2018.2.1) professional PHP integrated development tool
