search
HomeBackend DevelopmentC++Code written in C++: Find the lexicographically smallest string composed of the first K letters of the alphabet, and adjacent characters cannot be the same

Code written in C++: Find the lexicographically smallest string composed of the first K letters of the alphabet, and adjacent characters cannot be the same

In the programming world, solving string manipulation problems is a common and interesting challenge. A key problem faced is how to obtain a lexicographically minimal string using only the K letters of the alphabet, while adhering to additional constraints such as not matching adjacent characters. In this article, we aim to delve into this problem and propose an efficient solution using C programming language. By detailing the different methods used in the grammar and providing algorithmic details step by step, we can introduce innovative techniques aimed at achieving good results in different fields. We provide complete executable code guidance for each method to make it practical for users.

grammar

Before exploring algorithms and techniques, it is necessary to establish the syntax used in the code snippets that follow.

std::string findLexSmallestString(int n, int k);

In this syntax, n refers to the number of letters in the alphabet and k refers to the number of letters used. This function generates the lowest lexicographically ordered string that meets the specified conditions.

algorithm

To address and solve the challenge of finding the lexicographically minimal string with no repetitions between adjacent characters using only at most K letters of the alphabet, we formulated a methodical approach in the form of an algorithm.

  • Initialize an empty string "ans" and an array/vector "used" to track used characters.

  • Iterate starting from the first character of the alphabet.

  • Append the current character to `ans` and mark it as used.

  • If "ans" has multiple characters and the last two characters are the same, find the next available character by iterating from the current character to "n".

  • If no usable character is found, backtrack by removing the last character from "ans" and marking it as unused.

  • Repeat steps 3-5 until "ans" reaches length "k".

  • Returns "ans" as the lexicographically smallest string in which no two adjacent characters are the same, using all the first K letters of the alphabet.

Method 1: Greedy Algorithm

In this method, we will use the greedy strategy to construct the lexicographically smallest string. This same process emphasizes careful consideration of each character in sequence while ensuring that choices made throughout the process are focused on minimizing the lexicographic value of the overall output.

Example

#include <iostream>
#include <vector>

std::string findLexSmallestGreedy(int n, int k) {
   std::string ans = "";
   std::vector<bool> used(n, false);

   for (int i = 0; i < n; i++) {
      for (int j = 0; j < k; j++) {
         if (!used[j]) {
            if (ans.empty() || ans.back() != 'a' + j) {
               ans += 'a' + j;
               used[j] = true;
               break;
            }
         }
      }
   }

   return ans;
}

int main() {
   int n = 5; // Assuming there are 5 letters in the alphabet
   int k = 3; // Assuming 3 letters will be used

   std::string result = findLexSmallestGreedy(n, k);
   std::cout << "Lexicographically Smallest String: " << result << std::endl;

   return 0;
}

Output

Lexicographically Smallest String: abc

Method 2: Backtracking algorithm

This strategy involves utilizing backtracking to exhaustively search for every combination of characters while ensuring that consecutive characters are not repeated. Therefore, by considering every character at every position, we can find the lexicographically smallest string that satisfies the given constraints.

Example

#include <iostream>
#include <vector>

bool findLexSmallestBacktracking(int n, int k, std::vector<char>& ans, std::vector<bool>& used) {
   if (ans.size() == k) {
      return true;
   }

   for (int i = 0; i < n; i++) {
      if (!used[i]) {
         if (ans.empty() || ans.back() != 'a' + i) {
            ans.push_back('a' + i);
            used[i] = true;

            if (findLexSmallestBacktracking(n, k, ans, used)) {
               return true;
            }

            ans.pop_back();
            used[i] = false;
         }
      }
   }

   return false;
}

std::string findLexSmallestStringBacktracking(int n, int k) {
   std::vector<char> ans;
   std::vector<bool> used(n, false);

   if (findLexSmallestBacktracking(n, k, ans, used)) {
      return std::string(ans.begin(), ans.end());
   }

   return "";
}

int main() {
   int n = 22;  // Assuming n = 22
   int k = 4;  // Assuming k = 4

   std::string result = findLexSmallestStringBacktracking(n, k);
   std::cout << "Lexicographically Smallest String: " << result << std::endl;

   return 0;
}

Output

Lexicographically Smallest String: abcd

in conclusion

In this article, we explore the problem of finding the lexicographically smallest string using the first K letters of the alphabet, with the constraint that two adjacent characters cannot be the same. We discuss the syntax and provide two different approaches to solving this problem: the greedy algorithm and the backtracking algorithm. Greedy algorithms employ the strategy of minimizing the lexicographic value of the resulting string, while backtracking algorithms explore all possible combinations to find the desired string. The C code examples provided demonstrate the implementation of each method and enable us to efficiently generate lexicographically minimal strings. Armed with this knowledge, you can now confidently solve similar string manipulation problems and optimize your code accordingly.

The above is the detailed content of Code written in C++: Find the lexicographically smallest string composed of the first K letters of the alphabet, and adjacent characters cannot be the same. For more information, please follow other related articles on the PHP Chinese website!

Statement
This article is reproduced at:tutorialspoint. If there is any infringement, please contact admin@php.cn delete
C   XML Libraries: Comparing and Contrasting OptionsC XML Libraries: Comparing and Contrasting OptionsApr 22, 2025 am 12:05 AM

There are four commonly used XML libraries in C: TinyXML-2, PugiXML, Xerces-C, and RapidXML. 1.TinyXML-2 is suitable for environments with limited resources, lightweight but limited functions. 2. PugiXML is fast and supports XPath query, suitable for complex XML structures. 3.Xerces-C is powerful, supports DOM and SAX resolution, and is suitable for complex processing. 4. RapidXML focuses on performance and parses extremely fast, but does not support XPath queries.

C   and XML: Exploring the Relationship and SupportC and XML: Exploring the Relationship and SupportApr 21, 2025 am 12:02 AM

C interacts with XML through third-party libraries (such as TinyXML, Pugixml, Xerces-C). 1) Use the library to parse XML files and convert them into C-processable data structures. 2) When generating XML, convert the C data structure to XML format. 3) In practical applications, XML is often used for configuration files and data exchange to improve development efficiency.

C# vs. C  : Understanding the Key Differences and SimilaritiesC# vs. C : Understanding the Key Differences and SimilaritiesApr 20, 2025 am 12:03 AM

The main differences between C# and C are syntax, performance and application scenarios. 1) The C# syntax is more concise, supports garbage collection, and is suitable for .NET framework development. 2) C has higher performance and requires manual memory management, which is often used in system programming and game development.

C# vs. C  : History, Evolution, and Future ProspectsC# vs. C : History, Evolution, and Future ProspectsApr 19, 2025 am 12:07 AM

The history and evolution of C# and C are unique, and the future prospects are also different. 1.C was invented by BjarneStroustrup in 1983 to introduce object-oriented programming into the C language. Its evolution process includes multiple standardizations, such as C 11 introducing auto keywords and lambda expressions, C 20 introducing concepts and coroutines, and will focus on performance and system-level programming in the future. 2.C# was released by Microsoft in 2000. Combining the advantages of C and Java, its evolution focuses on simplicity and productivity. For example, C#2.0 introduced generics and C#5.0 introduced asynchronous programming, which will focus on developers' productivity and cloud computing in the future.

C# vs. C  : Learning Curves and Developer ExperienceC# vs. C : Learning Curves and Developer ExperienceApr 18, 2025 am 12:13 AM

There are significant differences in the learning curves of C# and C and developer experience. 1) The learning curve of C# is relatively flat and is suitable for rapid development and enterprise-level applications. 2) The learning curve of C is steep and is suitable for high-performance and low-level control scenarios.

C# vs. C  : Object-Oriented Programming and FeaturesC# vs. C : Object-Oriented Programming and FeaturesApr 17, 2025 am 12:02 AM

There are significant differences in how C# and C implement and features in object-oriented programming (OOP). 1) The class definition and syntax of C# are more concise and support advanced features such as LINQ. 2) C provides finer granular control, suitable for system programming and high performance needs. Both have their own advantages, and the choice should be based on the specific application scenario.

From XML to C  : Data Transformation and ManipulationFrom XML to C : Data Transformation and ManipulationApr 16, 2025 am 12:08 AM

Converting from XML to C and performing data operations can be achieved through the following steps: 1) parsing XML files using tinyxml2 library, 2) mapping data into C's data structure, 3) using C standard library such as std::vector for data operations. Through these steps, data converted from XML can be processed and manipulated efficiently.

C# vs. C  : Memory Management and Garbage CollectionC# vs. C : Memory Management and Garbage CollectionApr 15, 2025 am 12:16 AM

C# uses automatic garbage collection mechanism, while C uses manual memory management. 1. C#'s garbage collector automatically manages memory to reduce the risk of memory leakage, but may lead to performance degradation. 2.C provides flexible memory control, suitable for applications that require fine management, but should be handled with caution to avoid memory leakage.

See all articles

Hot AI Tools

Undresser.AI Undress

Undresser.AI Undress

AI-powered app for creating realistic nude photos

AI Clothes Remover

AI Clothes Remover

Online AI tool for removing clothes from photos.

Undress AI Tool

Undress AI Tool

Undress images for free

Clothoff.io

Clothoff.io

AI clothes remover

Video Face Swap

Video Face Swap

Swap faces in any video effortlessly with our completely free AI face swap tool!

Hot Tools

SecLists

SecLists

SecLists is the ultimate security tester's companion. It is a collection of various types of lists that are frequently used during security assessments, all in one place. SecLists helps make security testing more efficient and productive by conveniently providing all the lists a security tester might need. List types include usernames, passwords, URLs, fuzzing payloads, sensitive data patterns, web shells, and more. The tester can simply pull this repository onto a new test machine and he will have access to every type of list he needs.

WebStorm Mac version

WebStorm Mac version

Useful JavaScript development tools

Atom editor mac version download

Atom editor mac version download

The most popular open source editor

EditPlus Chinese cracked version

EditPlus Chinese cracked version

Small size, syntax highlighting, does not support code prompt function

DVWA

DVWA

Damn Vulnerable Web App (DVWA) is a PHP/MySQL web application that is very vulnerable. Its main goals are to be an aid for security professionals to test their skills and tools in a legal environment, to help web developers better understand the process of securing web applications, and to help teachers/students teach/learn in a classroom environment Web application security. The goal of DVWA is to practice some of the most common web vulnerabilities through a simple and straightforward interface, with varying degrees of difficulty. Please note that this software