AI large model products collectively rush to the college entrance examination examination room. Can iFlytek Spark win in the education track?

Recently, the 2023 college entrance examination has come to an end, and the topic of "using AI to write college entrance examination essays" has also been hotly discussed. In 2023, affected by the ChatGPT craze, domestic AI large model products are also springing up. For example, Internet giants such as Baidu, Alibaba, and 360 have successively launched large-scale AI model products such as Wen Xin Yi Yan, Tong Yi Qian Wen, and 360 Zhi Nao.

At the same time, some players who are deeply involved in the educational AI field are not willing to lag behind, and use large AI models to release their original advantages. As a listed company in the field of intelligent voice and artificial intelligence, iFlytek's large-scale model product iFlytek Spark has also attracted much attention in this wave of AI craze.

So, what is the actual writing level and usage experience of iFlytek Spark, which is highly related to the college entrance examination and education track? The author conducted a series of questions related to college entrance examination composition. Through personal testing experience, I found that this is indeed a very smart AI large model product. Although there are some shortcomings, it can be said that the flaws do not hide the advantages.

Flaws do not conceal the good points, but the real level may not be as good as the top students

First of all, the author took the National A-level roll as an example and had a dialogue with the iFlytek Spark Cognitive Model of HKUST. The title of the essay in this volume is: People have better control over time due to technological development, but some people have become servants of time. What associations and thoughts does this sentence trigger in you? Please write an article.

The author entered the full text of the college entrance examination essay requirements into iFlytek Spark. iFlytek Spark's "College Entrance Examination Essay" is as follows: The full text has a total of 855 words, and the answer time is within 30 seconds.

Source: iFlytek Spark Cognitive Large Model

It can be seen from the output content that iFlytek's semantic understanding of the questions is basically correct, and the logic of the writing is also very smooth. For example, in terms of how to use time correctly, iFlytek uses "because... ...So" and other expressions are well-founded, and the wording is also very colloquial, without any fancy rhetoric or obscure sentences.

However, as the most important test that reflects the writing level of candidates, the college entrance examination composition will also test the novelty of ideas and writing skills of candidates' compositions. And if you evaluate iFlytek Spark's "College Entrance Examination Essay" from these perspectives, it is not difficult to see its obvious shortcomings.

First of all, in terms of intention. iFlytek uses "time" as the title of a butcher's knife. Although it is easy to understand, it is too ordinary and even feels a bit perfunctory.

Secondly, there are multiple arguments in the article, such as "time is important", "we should learn to use time", "should combine work and rest, etc." However, the arguments for these viewpoints all have a certain didactic tone. There are no quotations from scriptures and there are not many examples to assist readers in understanding. Therefore, the arguments are not specific and convincing enough, and they lack literary talent.

Although two examples are cited at the end of the article, they are not inserted into the corresponding points of the article to support them, and they appear incomplete. In order to verify the intelligence of iFlytek Spark, the author continued to ask questions to it, trying to get it to write another article with a more novel and in-depth idea. The full text is as follows, with a total of 827 words, and the answer time is also within 30 seconds.

It can be seen from the full text that the content of this "College Entrance Examination Essay" is closer to the author's needs. For example, quotes from famous people such as Shakespeare, Einstein, Edison, and Jobs are used in the writing.

However, except for the famous quotes about time by the first two celebrities that can support their views, the famous quotes of Edison and Jobs cited in the article have little to do with the views, so they still appear not convincing enough. It can be seen that although iFlytek Xinghuo understands the semantics of the composition title requirements, it is still suspected of "copying" the composition requirements of citing scriptures.

According to the author’s personal testing of a number of large-model products, I found that the phenomenon of “copycatting” of such products is very common. Therefore, some netizens analyzed that perhaps AI large model products do not understand the meaning of "copying". According to the understanding of some netizens, copying refers to not copying things mechanically or using formulas and templates. Therefore, some netizens commented that the articles automatically generated by iFlytek Spark are too ordinary and more like the composition of an ordinary junior high school student.

In addition, the author found that most of the "college entrance examination essays" of large model products are argumentative essays. Therefore, I also tried to let iFlytek Xinghuo change its genre and style, and try iFlytek Xinghuo's ability to write more life-oriented topic compositions. Therefore, iFlytek Spark was tested with a composition on the topic of "story" in Volume I of the 2023 new curriculum standard.

Enter the full text of the essay title into iFlytek Spark, and the number of words in the output article is 763 words. The central idea of ​​the article is: stories have power, and the meaning and value of good stories are multifaceted. The full text also presents and supports each argument in a very hierarchical manner. The supporting content mainly refers to quoting scriptures and providing examples through ancient and modern literary works to draw conclusions.

However, the style of the entire text still seems to be an argumentative essay. The author believes that the modern elements are still missing, and it still has a strong didactic flavor. If you can give examples based on the changes that good stories bring to your relatives and friends, it may be far more convincing than just mentioning those literary works.

The experience is passable, but there are shortcomings

Fortunately, iFlytek Spark is more considerate in terms of functional experience than other large model products on the market. For example, in addition to viewing historical questions, creating new conversations, etc., the relevant menus are also placed in a very conspicuous position to prevent users from being unable to quickly find historical conversation records, and they can also select "Reanswer" with one click.

So, the author tried to change the way of asking questions and tried to ask questions continuously. However, personal testing found that iFlytek Spark does not seem to support continuous questioning.

Regarding the author’s questions about the previous article, iFlytek Spark also adopted the “ignore” approach. He did not directly answer the author's answer about being dissatisfied with the last "College Entrance Examination Essay", but directly re-wrote an article.

What is surprising is that the essay about "good stories" output this time is finally no longer an argumentative essay. It is an article that is very life-like and lists many real-life cases, so it reads more like the creations of real candidates.

It can be seen that the key to the output content of AI large model products lies in how users ask questions. On the basis that iFlytek and Spark can fully understand the semantics of user questions, as long as the content of the question is specific enough and the requirements are reasonable, iFlytek and Spark can output the content that the user really wants.

However, the fly in the ointment is that iFlytek Spark still has some obvious deviations in understanding the user’s intention to ask questions. For example, in the previous tests, it was clearly required that the essay should be composed of self-written topics, with a word count of no less than 800 words. However, the compositions actually output by iFlytek Spark have no titles and the number of words is sometimes less than 800 words. Through personal testing and comparison with other large model products, this problem is also relatively common.

It can also be predicted that how to achieve more accurate semantic understanding of large model products in the future will be one of the most important competitiveness.

What kind of large AI model products will humanity need in the future?

After testing the intelligence and user experience of iFlytek's large model products, we might as well look at what kind of large model products humans need from the user's perspective. First, let’s take a look at how iFlytek Spark answers this question. It’s also very interesting.

Through iFlytek’s answers, it is not difficult to see that these factors are indeed the optimization directions that users will pay close attention to in the future. However, before these features, how to establish good communication between robots and humans is the first step.

This is just like people from different countries using different languages. If there is no translator and each other does not understand the other language, then they will be talking to each other and naturally they will not get correct feedback. Therefore, the author believes that the first thing that all large-model products need to solve in the future is how to correctly understand the basic human language, including new vocabulary, Internet language, spoken language, dialects, etc. that have emerged with the changes of the times.

What is commendable is that iFlytek has been deeply involved in intelligent voice and artificial intelligence. Its translator products are selling well around the world, which is a strong proof of its different language conversion technology. Therefore, in comparison, iFlytek Spark theoretically has stronger technical research and development capabilities than other large models, which can optimize and iterate some of the current flaws of iFlytek Spark.

At a time when major Internet technology companies are launching large-scale model products, this year’s “Essay Contest” for the College Entrance Examination is both a training ground and a touchstone. When major manufacturers rush to the examination room collectively, it is no longer important who loses and who wins. What is important is to take advantage of this opportunity to understand the pros and cons of the large AI models of major manufacturers. Perhaps the major players are well aware of them.

What is very interesting is that when the author tried to ask iFlytek which company has the best AI large model products, the answer was very "tactful" and very low-key. He did not claim to be the number one in the industry, even in In the answer, all products mentioned were other companies' products, and there was no mention of "iFlytek Spark". If you look at this answer in a joking tone, iFlytek's "low-key and pragmatic" spirit is still worthy of recognition.

Human progress is always a breakthrough in thinking. The application of artificial intelligence is currently only the first step in a long march of thousands of miles. Although it is still far from the perfection that people want, it will definitely move towards the results that humans want to achieve.

Conclusion

As one of the players in the education AI track, iFlytek obviously understands education and students better. Therefore, compared with some large model products that cater to a large and comprehensive range of industries, iFlytek Spark is almost unique in the popular event of collective writing of AI large model articles. Therefore, while receiving more attention, iFlytek Spark will also Carrying the hope of more people.

We believe that as the application of AI large models becomes more and more mature, it will gradually become vertical in the industry, become more professional and ecological, and iFlytek will not only be able to use iFlytek Spark in its learning AI hardware products such as computers will also contribute to the education industry because of their openness.

The above is the detailed content of AI large model products collectively rush to the college entrance examination examination room. Can iFlytek Spark win in the education track?. For more information, please follow other related articles on the PHP Chinese website!