MySQL vs. TiDB: Which database is more suitable for large-scale data processing?

MySQL vs. TiDB: Which database is more suitable for large-scale data processing?

Introduction:
In large-scale data processing scenarios, choosing an appropriate database system is crucial. MySQL and TiDB are both common relational databases, and they both have the ability to process large-scale data. This article will compare the advantages and disadvantages of MySQL and TiDB in large-scale data processing, and give some code examples as a reference.

1. Overview
MySQL is a classic relational database with mature and stable features and a wide range of application scenarios. TiDB is an emerging database developed by PingCAP. It adopts new technologies such as distributed architecture and distributed transactions, and is more suitable for processing large-scale data. The following will compare data sharding, data consistency, performance and scalability.

2. Data sharding
Data sharding is an essential function in large-scale data processing. MySQL requires manual data sharding, partitioning and splitting according to business needs. TiDB uses automatic horizontal database and table sharding technology, which can automatically adjust sharding according to data volume and load conditions. The following is a TiDB code example:

-- 创建表
CREATE TABLE `user` (
  `id` int(11) NOT NULL AUTO_INCREMENT,
  `name` varchar(255) NOT NULL,
  `age` int(11) NOT NULL,
  PRIMARY KEY (`id`)
) ENGINE=InnoDB DEFAULT CHARSET=utf8;

-- 分区
ALTER TABLE `user` PARTITION BY RANGE(`id`) (
PARTITION `partition_1` VALUES LESS THAN (10000),
PARTITION `partition_2` VALUES LESS THAN (20000)
);

3. Data consistency
Data consistency is related to the accuracy and reliability of the data. MySQL uses the traditional two-phase commit (2PC) mechanism. When a transaction involves multiple nodes, additional measures need to be taken to ensure data consistency. TiDB uses the Raft consistency protocol, which has the capability of distributed transactions and ensures the consistency of data between nodes. The following is a TiDB code example:

// 创建分布式事务
tx, err := db.BeginTx(context.Background(), &sql.TxOptions{Isolation: sql.LevelSerializable})
if err != nil {
    log.Fatal(err)
}

// 执行SQL操作
_, err = tx.Exec("UPDATE user SET age = ? WHERE id = ?", 30, 1)
if err != nil {
    log.Fatal(err)
}

// 提交事务
if err := tx.Commit(); err != nil {
    log.Fatal(err)
}

4. Performance
Performance is one of the most critical indicators in large-scale data processing. MySQL has good performance on a single machine, but performance bottlenecks may occur when processing massive amounts of data. TiDB adopts a distributed architecture, which can expand horizontally, handle larger-scale data, and improve performance by automatically adjusting sharding and load balancing. The following is a code example comparing the performance of MySQL and TiDB:

-- MySQL查询
SELECT * FROM user WHERE age > 30;

-- TiDB查询
SELECT * FROM user WHERE age > 30;

5. Scalability
Scalability is one of the key requirements when processing large-scale data. MySQL is more limited in scalability and requires manual sharding and node expansion. TiDB adopts a distributed architecture, which can dynamically add nodes and flexibly expand the cluster size. The following is a sample code:

# 添加TiDB节点
./pd-ctl -u http://<pd-address>:<pd-port> store add -s <tiflash-ip>:<tiflash-grpc-port> --role=store

# 扩展TiDB集群规模
./tiflash-ctl --config-file=/path/to/tiflash.toml --action=enable --host=<tidb-ip> --web-port=<tidb-web-port>

Conclusion:
In summary, MySQL is suitable for processing small and medium-sized relational data, with mature features and a wide range of application scenarios. TiDB is suitable for large-scale data processing and has the characteristics of automatic sharding, distributed transactions, high performance and scalability. When selecting a database system, all factors should be considered comprehensively based on actual needs, and an appropriate database system should be selected based on the business scenario.

Total number of words: Count

References:

1. https://dev.mysql.com/doc/
2. https:// pingcap.com/blog/a-brief-comparison-of-mysql-and-tidb/

The above is the detailed content of MySQL vs. TiDB: Which database is more suitable for large-scale data processing?. For more information, please follow other related articles on the PHP Chinese website!