Home >Database >Mysql Tutorial >MySQL and PostgreSQL: Best practices for handling large-scale concurrent requests
MySQL and PostgreSQL: Best Practices for Handling Large-Scale Concurrent Requests
Abstract: In today's Internet era, the performance and stability of the database system are crucial to the processing of large-scale concurrent requests. This article will explore the best practices for handling large-scale concurrent requests, two popular relational databases, MySQL and PostgreSQL, and provide some code examples to help readers better understand.
Introduction:
With the continuous development and growth of the Internet industry, the database has become the core component that supports large-scale concurrent requests. MySQL and PostgreSQL are two widely used relational databases. How to optimize their configuration and use has become a topic of common concern to database administrators and developers.
MySQL’s concurrency control is mainly implemented through the lock mechanism. Control concurrent operations by using different lock granularities (table locks, row-level locks, and page-level locks). For large-scale concurrent requests, it is recommended to use row-level locks, which can minimize the probability of lock conflicts. In MySQL, you can use the following code example to set row-level locks:
-- 开启事务 START TRANSACTION; -- 设置行级锁 SELECT * FROM table_name WHERE id = 1 FOR UPDATE; -- 执行查询、插入、更新、删除等操作 -- 提交事务 COMMIT;
PostgreSQL uses multi-version concurrency control (MVCC). MVCC implements concurrency control by assigning a unique transaction ID to each transaction and adding a version number to each data row. In PostgreSQL, a transaction can see a snapshot of the data rows that were committed before it started, thus achieving data consistency and concurrency. Compared with MySQL's lock mechanism, the advantage of MVCC is that it reduces lock conflicts and improves concurrent processing capabilities. The following is an example of using MVCC to implement concurrency control:
-- 开启事务 BEGIN; -- 设置事务隔离级别为可重复读 SET TRANSACTION ISOLATION LEVEL REPEATABLE READ; -- 执行查询、插入、更新、删除等操作 -- 提交事务 COMMIT;
EXPLAIN
command. INT
instead of BIGINT
, avoiding unnecessary string lengths, etc. innodb_buffer_pool_size
parameter can be adjusted in MySQL, while the shared_buffers
parameter can be adjusted in PostgreSQL. max_connections
parameter, and in PostgreSQL, this can be achieved by modifying the max_connections
parameter and the max_worker_processes
parameter. Conclusion:
MySQL and PostgreSQL are two powerful relational databases. When processing large-scale concurrent requests, performance and stability can be improved through reasonable configuration and optimization. This article introduces best practices in concurrency control, query optimization, and configuration optimization, and provides some code examples to help readers better understand. In practical applications, readers should choose appropriate optimization strategies to improve database performance and stability based on specific needs and scenarios.
The above is the detailed content of MySQL and PostgreSQL: Best practices for handling large-scale concurrent requests. For more information, please follow other related articles on the PHP Chinese website!