OpenAI and Google have a double standard: use other people’s data to train large models, but never allow their own data to leak out

In a new era of generative AI, big tech companies are pursuing a "do as I say, not as I do" strategy when it comes to using online content. To a certain extent, this strategy can be said to be a double standard and an abuse of the right to speak.

At the same time, as large language models (LLM) become the mainstream trend in AI development, both large and start-up companies are sparing no effort to develop their own large models. Among them, training data is an important prerequisite for the ability of large models.

Recently, according to Insider reports, Microsoft-backed OpenAI, Google and its backed Anthropic have been using online content from other websites or companies for training for many years. Their generative AI model . These were all done without asking for specific permission and will form part of a brewing legal battle to determine the future of the web and how copyright law is applied in this new era.

These big tech companies may argue that they are fair use, whether that is really the case is up for debate. But they won’t let their content be used to train other AI models. So we can’t help but ask, why can these large technology companies use other companies’ online content when training large models?

These companies are smart, but also very hypocritical

Is there any solid evidence for the claim that big tech companies use other people’s online content but don’t allow others to use their own? This can be seen in the terms of service and use of some of their products.

First let’s look at Claude, which is an AI assistant similar to ChatGPT launched by Anthropic. The system can complete tasks such as summary summarization, search, assistance in creation, question and answer, and coding. It was upgraded again some time ago and the context token was expanded to 100k, which greatly accelerated the processing speed.

Claude’s Terms of Service are as follows. You may not access or use the Service in the following ways (some of which are listed here). If any of these restrictions are inconsistent or unclear with the Acceptable Use Policy, the latter shall prevail:

• Develop any product or service that competes with our Services, including developing or training any AI or machine learning algorithms or models
• From our Crawl, crawl or otherwise obtain data or information from the Service

Claude Terms of Service Address: https://vault.pactsafe.io/s /9f502c93-cb5c-4571-b205-1e479da61794/legal.html#terms

Similarly, Google’s Generative AI Terms of Use states, “You may not use the Service To develop machine learning models or related technologies."

##Google Generative AI Terms of Use Address: https: //policies.google.com/terms/generative-ai

What about OpenAI’s terms of use? Similar to Google, "You may not use the output of this service to develop models that compete with OpenAI."

OpenAI Terms of Use Address: https://openai.com/policies/terms-of-use

These companies are smart, they know that high-quality content is critical to training new AI models, so it makes sense not to allow others to use their output in this way. But they have no scruples in using other people’s data to train their own models. How to explain this?

OpenAI, Google and Anthropic declined Insider's request for comment and did not respond.

Reddit, Twitter and Others: Enough is Enough

Actually, other companies weren't happy when they realized what was happening. In April, Reddit, which has been used for years to train AI models, plans to start charging for access to its data.

Reddit CEO Steve Huffman said, “Reddit’s data corpus is too valuable to give away that value to the largest companies in the world for free.”

Also in April this year, Musk accused Microsoft, OpenAI’s main supporter, of illegally using Twitter data to train AI models. "Time for litigation," he tweeted.

#However, in response to Insider's comment, Microsoft said, "There are so many things wrong with this premise that I don't even know where to start. ”

OpenAI CEO Sam Altman has tried to deepen this problem by exploring new AI models that respect copyright. According to Axios, he recently said, "We are trying to develop a new model. If the AI ​​system uses your content or uses your style, you will get paid for it."

Sam Altman

Publishers (including Insiders) will all have vested interests. Additionally, some publishers, including U.S. News Corp., are already pushing for tech companies to pay to use their content to train AI models.

The current training method of AI models "breaks" the network

A former Microsoft executive said there must be something wrong with this. Microsoft veteran and famous software developer Steven Sinofsky believes that the current training method of AI models "breaks" the network.

Steven Sinofsky

He’s pushing The post reads, "In the past, crawled data was used in exchange for click-through rates. But now it is only used to train a model and does not bring any value to creators and copyright owners."

Perhaps, as more companies wake up, this uneven data usage in the era of generative AI will soon be changed.

The above is the detailed content of OpenAI and Google have a double standard: use other people’s data to train large models, but never allow their own data to leak out. For more information, please follow other related articles on the PHP Chinese website!