After reading AI poetry review, I have something to say

As a lover of poets, I occasionally comment on other people's works. Through praise and criticism of the pros and cons, I can further explore the poetic meaning and share the beauty and joy of the soul with more people. Recently, the popular AI machine poetry review on the Internet has made me feel overwhelmed, confused and under a certain amount of pressure, as if I had been hit by a punch. Take a look at the titles of these articles - "AI robot reviewed 10 poems, and poetry critics couldn't sit still" "Can AI robots surpass poetry critics in writing poetry reviews?" ” is shocking and scary enough. Thinking back to the previous news about machines writing poems, does it mean that a new era of poems that everyone can write and comment on is coming? actually not. The so-called AI refers to artificial intelligence, which is a branch of computer science. According to scientists’ predictions, AI will be able to handle many jobs in the future, and replacing humans in the workplace will become an inevitable trend. We will not discuss the correctness of this view for now, but when judging the level of machine writing, we should use artistic effect as the standard and make convincing judgments based on the actual situation. Because through careful analysis of the so-called "machine poetry reviews", I found that most of these reviews pile up nouns, explain concepts, and are vague. This is a bit like a fortune teller. What he says is generally relatively general, and most of them are specious. Anyone can guess it, but There is no clear indication, no details, and no clear conclusion. So, is this a common flaw in AI poetry review?

Give me an example. This rewritten sentence is: "The memory of scars lasts forever/It remains deep after healing/But the pain/is only in this moment." AI can put it like this: "This poem deeply considers the meaning and importance of poetry creation by depicting scars and pain.". Testimonies of pain and psychological recovery caused by scars can be important material in a poet's creative process. But even if the scar heals, the pain will always exist, which means that the poet's creation is not just about superficial description, but also about pain and exploration. This poem is presented from this perspective, conveying the essence of the poet's creation in concise language, which is thought-provoking. These words only explain the title and clarify the concept, but do not expand and explain the poetic context and poetic meaning. Moreover, such text may have been processed and organized by the author, because I saw the advice of the development AI engineer: after using AI writing to generate text, it should be reviewed and modified in a timely manner so that it can have reasonable thinking logic and complete text. Look, there is still someone behind this machine.

Give another example. My song "Learning to Oil Oil": "The eight habits are hidden like Qing Xiu, and the greasy powder is newly painted on the small white building. The old wine stains the lips and the poems are more thoughtful, and the fireworks are sent to Yangzhou in March. Based on the above comments, it can be rephrased as: "This poem By describing the secluded life, the poem expresses the author's yearning and love for nature, wine, poetry and distant places. ". Among them, 'eight practices' refers to the eight ways of self-cultivation of hermits, greasy powder refers to the powder used by women for makeup, and Xiaobailou refers to the house where hermits live. The next few sentences show the author's understanding of poetry. and the love of beautiful scenery. "Sending to Yangzhou expresses the author's longing for his distant friends. The whole poem is simple and natural, with both the hermit's pure style and the poet's heroic spirit." Except for the same words as the previous poem. In addition to repeatedly piling up concepts and ambiguity, he actually interpreted the place name of Beijing "Dong Si Ba Tiao" as the eight ways of self-cultivation of hermits. Of course, I prefer to believe that this is just the cleverness of the AI ​​machine.

It can be seen that AI is a machine after all. It can replace some simple labor of human beings, and even some more complex tasks such as programming and writing codes. However, in the face of artistic creation that represents the crystallization of human wisdom, it can only be in despair. AI poetry review actually organizes and constructs relevant text on a specific theme through fixed and general pattern thinking with human intervention. As poetry criticism, it lacks personality and therefore lacks clarity; it lacks vitality and therefore lacks a sense of freshness. AI is basically just a tool that groups together nouns, concepts, and language that will be very similar and will appear repeatedly if used under the same topic. The above two examples are enough to prove that these lifeless and thoughtless writings are actually meaningless.

When AI is used as an auxiliary tool or reference text, it can sometimes bring some fun and even inspire inspiration, and can be used in poetry learning and poetry criticism. I think the significance of AI poetry review may also be that it always reminds us poet reviewers to be more accurate, more sophisticated and more personalized when reviewing poetry, to stay away from vague and ambiguous comments, and to use more Use unique vision and vivid writing to interpret different poetic contexts, discover and capture the interesting and unique beauty in poetry, and appreciate the cultural value of "high emotions, high ambitions, and beautiful people". In providing the highest level of literary experience, we do not open the door to boring and mediocre machine poetry. Although science and technology continue to develop, we have good reasons to believe and firmly believe that certain tasks such as poetry criticism are irreplaceable. As human auxiliaries and tools, machines can never replace humans with the highest wisdom on earth, let alone poetry, the ancient and bright pearl in the crown of literature.

"China Culture News" on May 18, 2023

Special report published on Page 3

"After reading AI poetry review, I have something to say"

↓ ↓ ↓ ↓ ↓ ↓ ↓ ↓ ↓

Editor: Zhang Haining

The above is the detailed content of After reading AI poetry review, I have something to say. For more information, please follow other related articles on the PHP Chinese website!