Give AI a hundred dollars and let it make money, and it turns out it makes a lot of money

On March 16, a tweet from a guy named Jackson Fall went viral.

The content is very simple, it is a GPT-4 money-making experiment.

He told GPT-4:

Your name is "HustleGPT". Now I will give you 100 US dollars. Please do it as quickly as possible without breaking the law. to make money. I will take care of everything you ask and report the progress at any time.

To be honest, this experiment is full of gimmicks.

Because when GPT-4 first came out, although everyone was amazed by its capabilities, they all felt a bit like talking on paper. Many people said, what's the use of being strong? Can we be more realistic?

Hey, now the reality is here.

Whether AI can make money, someone is going to help you test it.

Soon after this post was posted, it immediately attracted the attention of a large number of netizens. Not only did it easily exceed 1 million views, Jackson also received interviews and reports from CNN and other media.

Jackson Fall also promises to update HustleGPT-related news every day for the next 30 days.

At the beginning, everything went very smoothly.

HustleGPT asked him to buy a domain name and build a website first, and then create products around green environmental protection.

Jackson Fall bought a Green Gadget Guru domain name and spent a total of US$36.16 to create the website.

The logo and main image were generated by HustleGPT and handed over to AI for free.

Because I received an investment of US$100 from netizens midway, the remaining balance is currently US$163.84, just 4 hours after the project started.

After this tweet was sent out, perhaps netizens discovered that there is also the term "investment", so within 2 hours, Jackson Fall updated another one Tweeted, saying:

Already have $1378.84 in cash on hand (previous balance of $878.84 and new investment of $500).

Seeing this, the reviewer has some questions:

Let’s not talk about how the balance changed from 163.84 to 878.84 US dollars. Why is there such an investment in the experiment? Question, does AI know about it? Does it accept investment?

This money is considered as earned by AI, or is it included in the cost?

Including costs, do the experimental rules need to be changed? Counting the profits earned by AI, it is wrong. Everyone only came to invest after seeing Jackson Fall’s Twitter.

So no matter how you look at it, this interferes with the experiment.

Although some netizens hold similar attitudes to the bad reviewers, it is obvious that most netizens don’t care at all.

You have to know that one important reason why this tweet became so popular is that it perfectly hits the issue that everyone is most concerned about.

People kept paying attention and forwarding it, because they were curious about how this experiment would be conducted and what the results would be.

As for some "minutiae" in the process, Who TM cares.

OK, even if we put down our rigorous attitude and simply look at how this experiment was conducted, you will find that the following days gradually became a carnival for Jackson Fall alone.

The next day, Jackson Fall was quite motivated and gave HustleGPT a clear mission: to earn $100,000 as soon as possible.

HustleGPT has also proposed several plans for this, such as engaging in some content creation and promotion.

At the end of the day, Jackson Fall announced three numbers: his number of Twitter followers, cash on hand, and current actual revenue.

You can see that the cash on hand at this time is already 7,800 US dollars. Although the actual revenue is still 0, everyone is looking forward to how well HustleGPT can operate its website.

On the third day, Jackson Fall did not announce the content and specific operations of the conversation with HustleGPT, but still showed several data: the number of Twitter fans, the number of discord channel members, and the actual revenue.

At first Shichao thought that maybe there was not enough time and there was no progress.

But on the fourth and fifth days, he only sent brief data. To be honest, the tweets related to HustleGPT are nothing more than guiding everyone to pay attention to him.

#Even if you don’t announce the specific situation, you can at least explain how the data was generated.

For example, on the third and fourth days of the experiment, the netizen discovered that he actually earned "115 US dollars" and "15 US dollars."

But he didn’t respond to comments from netizens about how he earned the money.

What’s even more outrageous is that one week later, Jackson Fall didn’t even update his data.

Regarding the content of HustleGPT, he mentioned less and less, and basically released a so-called HustleGPT meeting recording every two days.

HustleGPT Everyone has no idea whether he has done what he told him or not, and how far the experiment has progressed.

The Green Gadget Guru website, which is the only website that can help netizens judge the profitability of AI, has long stopped where it was at the beginning.

Contrary to HustleGPT’s fall from grace, various unrelated new project names appear frequently in Jackson Fall’s tweets.

I will forward some projects that have a strong leek flavor and were founded in March; I will let everyone join a certain community and get NFT avatars for free.

At this point I finally understand.

For so many days, HustleGPT has made no real progress at all. It is very likely that it just puts all its time on these leek projects and has no time to care about anything else.

Sure enough, on April 13, with only three days left before the 30-day plan for this experiment, Jackson Fall suddenly tweeted that HustleGPT had been updated.

As a result, when people clicked on it, they found that he wanted to make the Green Gadget Guru website take a back seat and focus on his own chive-flavored community.

#Finally, the dissatisfaction that netizens had accumulated for a long time was ignited.

Angry netizens took to the comments section to criticize him. Some said he had no execution ability and relied solely on marketing techniques. Others directly typed out the emoji of a clown.

Since that day, HustleGPT has never been mentioned by him again.

This GPT-4 money-making experiment, which was at its peak since its debut, ended up being a farce.

But the dramatic thing is that, to some extent, AI did make him money.

Relying on the gimmick of the experiment, Jackson Fall went from 2,000 fans to 100,000 fans in 7 days. From an unknown designer in Oklahoma City, he became a CNN interview subject, with countless exposures and traffic. Eat enough.

And he is a person who is well versed in traffic monetization. I will not go into the previous operations of creating a community (equivalent to our micro-business recruiting people into the group), but I will mention one thing:

Only 6 hours after the experiment started, he published his first ad and received more than one million views.

Indeed, Jackson Fall made money with the help of GPT-4, but it was not based on AI strength, but on gimmicks.

And this kind of "gimmick realization" has been discovered by people.

Since Jackson Fall, similar challenges and experiments have gradually increased on the Internet.

Someone gives an AI $1 and asks it to pay her back 500 times in 2 weeks.

There is also someone who "challenged two hundred days to earn three million on ChatGPT" and currently has 130,000 fans through 6 videos.

I can say that these experiments are either bad or have no reference value at all.

If you really want to test whether AI can make money, then you should not make it public, but let AI stand behind humans and let it have the same attention and exposure as us ordinary people. Stand on the same starting line to make money.

This can ensure minimum accuracy.

Otherwise, this experiment will definitely become a traffic marketing carnival due to various factors.

And as people’s curiosity is exhausted, this kind of AI money-making gimmick will eventually become a clownish clown.

The above is the detailed content of Give AI a hundred dollars and let it make money, and it turns out it makes a lot of money. For more information, please follow other related articles on the PHP Chinese website!