“Does the ethical framework for artificial intelligence need to be re-examined?”

Artificial intelligence has two obvious goals, which are not mutually exclusive for now, but only one of them can benefit mankind in the long term. These goals are either to enhance people's jobs or to replace people. Two stories caught my attention recently that suggest we may need to adjust what we think of as ethical behavior to properly utilize artificial intelligence.

The first story is about an artist using AI to create artwork that unfairly wins an art competition, while the other story is about using AI to allow students to write better papers faster. The latter is currently linked to cheating.

Both are like arguments I've heard in the past about how calculators and PCs should be banned from schools because they avoid learning the multiplication tables or doing primary research in the library instead of on Wikipedia Need, even if skills evolve over time, using both methods will be more valuable to students as employees than the old way of doing things.

In short, what we ultimately have to figure out is whether using AI to create better products faster is considered cheating, or is it just erring on the side of caution?

Big Artificial Intelligence Ethical Issues

What we haven’t discussed about artificial intelligence is that it may be much easier to create artificial intelligence that replaces humans than it is to create artificial intelligence that enhances humans. The first approach simply focuses on replicating what the person did, creating a digital twin of them, and there are already companies doing this. Even simpler, you don't need to be in contact with humans, who lack a common language, common skills, common interests, or even a common body type. We haven’t even trained people how to deal with conversational AI. As mentioned before, we tend to punish those who use tools effectively rather than reward their skills.

This means that the most effective path of use of AI is not the enhancement path, but the alternative path, because the AI ​​operating alone within its parameters is not objectionable, but the AI ​​is used to significantly enhance the user, especially In competition, this would be considered cheating. This focus on replacement is particularly evident with self-driving cars.

For self-driving cars, the current default technology is to enhance the driver's capabilities, which Toyota calls "Guardian Angel." But in tests, Intel found that giving human drivers control in self-driving cars increases driver stress because they don't know if they will suddenly be asked to drive. Untrained drivers feel more comfortable if the car doesn't offer a human driver option, suggesting that self-driving cars that don't allow or augment a human driver will be more reliable in the long run than those that do. Popular and successful.

In fact, while the industry and companies like IBM are actively promoting AI as a human augmentation tool, the way the market treats this technology (because it is not focused on training better human AI interface and comfort) is becoming a mandatory function of AI as a human replacement, which will become problematic as the labor pool subsequently collapses.

Does it matter if humans are helped by artificial intelligence?

It’s normal for an artist or writer to collaborate with someone more capable than themselves to create a piece of art, a paper, or even a book. Moreover, it is not uncommon for someone to use the shadow writer's name to create a book with the shadow writer's permission.

Would it be worse if an AI was used instead of a teacher/mentor/collaborator/partner/ghostwriter? Or, would using technology be better at connecting the job and the user, since the AI ​​may independently reflect the user's wishes better than another human being, and less ethical since the user doesn't have another person's work as their own? Compromise?

Summary: Rethinking Artificial Intelligence Ethics

Businesses just want quality work, and if they can get higher quality from machines (AI) than people, they will Make and have made less difficult choices. Just think about the process of manufacturing and warehouse automation over the past few decades.

We need to train people on how to use AI and how to accept work products that make the most efficient use of AI resources, while ensuring we prevent intellectual property theft and plagiarism. If we don’t do this, it’s likely that over time the trend in AI will continue to shift from a focus on human assistance to human replacement, which will not be beneficial to industries or the growing number of professions that can make better use of artificial intelligence. intelligent.

The above is the detailed content of “Does the ethical framework for artificial intelligence need to be re-examined?”. For more information, please follow other related articles on the PHP Chinese website!