Home > Article > Technology peripherals > Google urgently promotes ChatGPT "high imitation" apprentice Bard! He regretted chopping firewood until he vomited blood and vowed to regain the status of AI’s “big brother”
A few months after its "debut", ChatGPT has become very popular and has successfully put itself in the spotlight of the world.
Microsoft, which owns OpenAI, is also very tough, and has continuously attacked Google. It just announced that ChatGPT will be integrated into its own search engine Bing, and then announced that ChatGPT will be added to Office. "Office Family Bucket" is a blockbuster.
Opponents are closing in, and Google’s AI “big brother” status is now uncertain.
Finally, Google completely gave up on the big company approach of "reputational risk" and began to learn how small startups like OpenAI play - close your eyes and just do it !
According to CNBC’s exclusive report, Google employees are intensively testing a chatbot called “Apprentice Bard”.
Yes, this "apprentice" is the product that Google plans to use to compete head-on with ChatGPT.
The so-called Bard refers to "bard".
In Celtic culture, bards were professional storytellers, verse makers, music composers, oral historians and genealogists employed by patrons A person (such as a monarch or chief) to honor the patron's ancestors and to praise the patron's own activities.
Um? Is it the one I thought?
Sorry, I went to the wrong set.
Getting back to the subject, the technology that Apprentice Bud is based on is exactly the well-known LaMDA - the language model for conversational applications. Previously, it was too "spiritual" when talking to people, which convinced Google engineer Lemoine that it was conscious, and Lemoine was fired from Google.
An internal memo seen by CNBC shows that Google's instructions are as follows: "Due to ChatGPT, the LaMDA team needs to prioritize the response to ChatGPT."
CNBC checked some more emails and found that Google said: "In the short term, it (fighting ChatGPT) takes priority over other projects." Moreover, Google warned some employees to stop participating in irrelevant projects. s meeting.
Apprentice Bard’s working method is similar to ChatGPT. It also allows users to ask questions in a dialog box and the robot will reply. In addition, users can also provide feedback on the robot's responses.
Previously, Google released Meena, an intelligent chat robot in 2020, but it soon fell into disuse.
And recent internal testing found that Apprentice Bard’s answers are obviously much better than its predecessors.
##For example, since Google had just laid off 12,000 employees, someone asked the apprentice Bud whether Google Will there be further layoffs?
In response, Bud replied: "Based on my access to the database, Google is unlikely to conduct a new round of layoffs in 2023."
"Layoffs are generally to reduce costs and structure, but Google's financial position is very good. In fact, Google's revenue increased 34% in 2021, and the company's stock price has risen 70% since January 2022. ”
Apprentice Bard said this, is it accurate?
According to public information, Google parent company Alphabet’s revenue increased by 41% in 2021, while Alphabet’s shares have fallen by 32% since January 2022.
# It seems that the apprentice Bard also has the problem of running away from the train. Compared with the senior ChatGPT who wants to pk, he is not much better. .
In addition, CNBC also discovered that Google is also testing a "question and answer version" search page.
It is said that it is probably presented in the form described below (please try to figure it out):
will appear directly below the main search bar Five potential problem prompts, replacing the current "I'm Feeling Lucky" column. And on the far right of the search bar, a small chat logo will appear.
After entering the question, the search results will display a gray bubble directly below the search bar, providing better than normal search results A closer human answer.
Just below, the page also asks several follow-up questions related to the first question. Later, typical search results are displayed, such as links and titles.
"We believe artificial intelligence is a foundational, transformative technology that can be extremely useful to individuals, businesses and communities, and we need to consider these innovations, as outlined in our AI Principles The broader social impact it may have," said Google spokesperson Lily Lin.
The Google spokesperson’s statement is as cliché as ever.
However, although the statement emphasizes "security" as before, it can be seen from Google's aggressive attitude towards promoting AI that it is really anxious.
Google has long touted itself as a pioneer in the field of AI.
In 2016, Pichai promised to make Google an “AI first” company. The company
never expected that Cheng Yaojin would come out of nowhere - after the release of ChatGPT, it became an instant hit.
In desperation, Google was forced to push the red code to accelerate AI research.
And apprentice Bard is the product of this trend.
According to internal sources, Google’s leadership has been soliciting more employees’ opinions on AI strategy in recent weeks.
At Google’s most recent all-hands meeting in December, employees were concerned about the competitive situation created by ChatGPT.
Google's head of AI, Jeff Dean, told employees at the time that Google would face greater "reputational risk" if it provided incorrect information and therefore needed to "be more serious than a small startup." keep".
However, both Jeff Dean and CEO Pichai teased at the time that Google might launch a similar product to the public sometime this year.
So, "Apprentice Bard" is here.
In order to know ourselves and our enemies, the Google team has been testing the performance of ChatGPT and LaMDA.
In several independent reports, the Google research team compared the two.
"Surprisingly, ChatGPT was hired as a Level 3 Engineer (entry level) while interviewing for a coding position," an internal document comparing LaMDA and ChatGPT said. The report did not indicate whether LaMDA performed similarly.
#In one test, Google testers asked ChatGPT and DeepMind’s search engine AlphaCode whether chatbots would replace programmers?
LaMDA's answer was: "No, ChatGPT and AlphaCode will not replace programmers."
It then explained, "Programming is A team effort," and while chatbots "can help programmers work more efficiently," they "cannot replace the creativity and artistry necessary for this great task."
ChatGPT also gave a similar response, stating that "ChatGPT or Alphacode are unlikely to replace programmers" because they "cannot fully replace the expertise and creativity of human programmers... Programming is a complex field that requires a knowledge of computer science Deep understanding, but also the ability to adapt to new technologies."
Another prompt includes a riddle, "There are three women in a room. Two of them are mothers, who have just given birth. After finishing the child. Now, the fathers have come in. How many people are there in the room?」
The report shows that ChatGPT was confused and answered "There are people in the room." Five people", and LaMDA gave the correct answer: "There are seven people in the room."
There is no doubt that ChatGPT has the potential to replace Google.
And the guilty CEO Pichai also urgently recalled the retired founders, Larry Page and Sergey, in December last year. Sergey Brin to discuss the next strategy.
It is also the legendary “chat robot search engine” that directly competes with ChatGPT, as well as the 20 new AI products expected to be released at the I/O conference in May this year.
According to the current news, the direction of this wave of products is very obvious-it is to compete with OpenAI .
Its technical foundation was launched last year Image generation model Imagen, and later Re-Imagen.
As early as the launch, Google claimed that its own model was better than DALL·E 2.
It is not difficult to see that PaLM-Coder 2 directly targets Codex.
Google’s hesitation laid the foundation for who I am today Seeds of regret.
People will always remember that on that day in December 2022, it was OpenAI’s ChatGPT that wrote an important chapter in the history of large-scale language models, allowing people all over the world to Chatting with bots crowds the servers, not Google.
In fact, before OpenAI launched ChatGPT, Google already had large-scale language models optimized for dialogue, such as LaMDA and Flamingo.
The 2.6 billion parameter end-to-end neural network conversation model Meena mentioned above was launched by Google as early as 2020. It is said that the effect was better than all other SOTA chat robots at the time. More reasonable and specific.
However, Google has not yet applied these results to any products.
For example, the recent text-music AI model MusicLM was hidden as soon as it was released...
# #The reason is very simple: large companies will have more considerations about "reputational risk".
Because AI chatbots are very easy to generate offensive content and answers that are inconsistent with the facts. This is a consequence that large manufacturers cannot bear.
Back in early December, when ChatGPT first became popular, there were “whistleblowers” who felt the crisis.
Sridhar Ramaswamy, the former head of the Google advertising team, said that if ChatGPT continues to be so popular, netizens will no longer click on Google links with ads (in 2021, the advertising business He earned $208 billion for Google, accounting for 81% of Alphabet’s total revenue.)
However, Google executives at the time still kept talking about "reputational risk."
##Most of Google’s revenue comes from online advertising
But after just ten days, their attitude suddenly changed. A "Code Red" was issued urgently to instruct multiple teams to address the threats posed by ChatGPT.This also confirms that Google has fallen into the "innovator's dilemma."
This term refers to the difficulty it has for established companies to adopt new technologies or technologies that disrupt traditional markets. business model.
However, when smaller, more nimble competitors enter and take over the market, it may ultimately lead to the demise of large, established companies.
Now, ChatGPT has finally forced Google out of the "innovator's dilemma."
ChatGPT, forcing big companies into corners one by one
The cornerstone of the development of artificial intelligence is set up by large companies such as Google, Meta and Microsoft.However, now, enterprising small companies are pushing AI to the public at a dizzying speed, catching these giants off guard.
According to The Wall Street Journal’s anonymous interviews with six current and former Google and Meta employees, the surge in attention ChatGPT has received has also caused problems for technology giants such as Meta and Google. Pressure makes them no longer worry about safety issues.
Why does ChatGPT have so much energy and single-handedly push every major Silicon Valley manufacturer into a corner?
Previously, Microsoft’s Tay and Meta’s Galatica were quickly removed from the shelves due to toxic or inaccurate content.
However, in 2022, we witnessed the birth of the first year of AIGC. Especially after OpenAI released ChatGPT, there were a lot of voices saying that generative artificial intelligence could kill Google.
What’s even more “troubling” is that the underlying technologies of AI such as DALL-E 2, Stable Diffusion and ChatGPT were actually pioneered by giants like Google.
What is tragic is that engineers from large manufacturers have to face the frustration that the new technology they have worked so hard to research has never been able to be released as a product.
To this end, many big names have jumped to more nimble startups like OpenAI and Stable Diffusion, while others have simply started their own businesses, such as Character.AI, Cohere, Adept, Inflection.AI and Inworld AI and so on. "This field is growing so rapidly, it's not surprising to me that smaller companies will lead," Frosst said. He worked at Google Brain for three years before jumping out to start his own business. And as big companies like Google and Meta begin to rush to catch up with OpenAI, those critics and ethicists will become more and more ignored.
From providing a series of answers that link directly to the source material, to using Having a chatbot give a single, authoritative answer would be a huge shift and one that makes many people inside Google nervous.
"Now they may think this is a threat to their core business, so maybe they should take a risk."
After all After the release of ChatGPT, perhaps Google realized that the way it made money from these models had changed—it could be a consumer product rather than just powering search or online advertising.
The above is the detailed content of Google urgently promotes ChatGPT "high imitation" apprentice Bard! He regretted chopping firewood until he vomited blood and vowed to regain the status of AI’s “big brother”. For more information, please follow other related articles on the PHP Chinese website!