Just now, the Google version of ChatGPT has opened for beta testing! There is no Chinese version yet, and netizens are going crazy

Just now, Google officially opened the test application for its own ChatGPT! CEO Pichai issued a message to thank 80,000 employees for working overtime to successfully launch Bard.

It has been a week since GPT-4 was released, but the popularity has not diminished at all.

Even if OpenAI raised the limit to only 25 questions in 3 hours, the server was still overcrowded by netizens...

After being bombarded by Microsoft, Google finally got a few It was announced hours ago that its own ChatGPT, Bard, has officially started testing!

However, Bard is currently only available to select users in the US and UK, while other users in the region (IP) will need to manually join the waitlist.

In addition, Google also stated that the promotion of Bard will be very slow, and it will not disclose when it will be fully publicly accessible.

Queue address: https://bard.google.com/

Compared with the previous market value of more than 100 billion that evaporated due to errors, this time Bard After the launch of the beta test, Google ushered in a nearly 4% increase.

First experience with Bard: no emotions, lots of mistakes, and guidance when writing code

with OpenAI’s ChatGPT and Microsoft Like the Bing chatbot, Bard provides users with a blank text box and invites users to ask questions on any topic they like.

Given the tendency of these bots to make up information, Google has repeatedly emphasized that Bard is not a replacement for the search engine, but a "supplement to search" - users can get inspiration, generate drafts, or just chat. , talk about life.

#In a blog post, Google executives described Bard in cautious terms: "An early experiment... .The purpose is to help everyone be more productive and inspire curiosity." and, a product that lets users “collaborate with generative AI.”

It is not difficult to see that Google seems to be trying its best to avoid the responsibilities that may arise after Bard explodes.

In demonstrations, Bard was able to answer general questions quickly and fluently, such as offering advice on how to encourage children to bowl: "Take them to a bowling alley."

Generally speaking, Bard will generate three replies for each user's question (but the content is not very different), and will put a prominent "Google" button under each reply. Users are redirected to relevant Google searches.

Like ChatGPT and Bing, Bard has a prominent disclaimer below the main text box, warning users that "it may display inaccurate or objectionable information." , and this does not represent Google’s views.”

As expected, extracting factual information from Bard is not simple

Although the chatbot has the blessing of Google search, it The correct answer was not given in multiple tests.

For example, when asked a question about the maximum load capacity of a specific washing machine, Bard "invented" three different but incorrect answers.

Although after repeated inquiries, Bard finally retrieved the correct information. But for those users who have not read an authoritative source such as the machine manual in advance, the correct answer is basically gone.

"This is a good example of the model hallucinating when faced with a large number of numbers that are all relevant to this query. So when it happens to figure out the context, it spits out the correct answer. But sometimes it gets it wrong."

And the following example. Bard: ChatGPT is GPT-4 powered…

So how does Bard compare to ChatGPT and Bing?

Obviously, Bard also has powerful capabilities, and even now its response speed is faster than other competing products (although this is probably just because the number of users is too small).

But Bard currently only seems to support English, and it is not (completely) good at writing code...

Yes, at this time it is necessary to use our Big killer: prompt hack!

Or, you can just say to it directly, "Write a piece of code for me."

In addition, Bard lacks the clear footnotes of Bing, and the answers seem more limited.

Regarding the former, Google says footnotes only appear when directly citing a source (such as a news article).

For the latter, this can be a double-edged sword.

Take Microsoft's Bing as an example. Although it has received a lot of negative reviews after various PUAs and teasing, it has also made quite a few users fall in love with this robot.

In contrast, Bard seems to have no such ability.

Lucky netizens have already played it

Some netizens said that the results provided by Bard are not only unexpectedly safe, but also of high quality.

What’s interesting is that Bard will directly slap himself in the face on some issues!

For example, in the Google antitrust case, Bard sided with the Department of Justice: "I hope the court will rule in favor of the Department of Justice and order Google to take measures to break its monopoly."

However, the answer below is a bit creepy...

Bard: My training set contains Gmail data.

Internal CEO letter: Thank you to the 80,000 people who worked overtime to test

Google CEO Sundar Pichai said in a memo on Tuesday that Bard will be able to The successful launch is thanks to the 80,000 employees who participated in the test.

But "things will always go wrong", and subsequent user feedback is crucial to improving the product and underlying technology.

#Finally, the editor who was still in line shed tears of envy again.

Reference:

https://www.theverge.com/2023/3/21/23649794/google-chatgpt-rival-bard-ai-chatbot-access-hands-on

The above is the detailed content of Just now, the Google version of ChatGPT has opened for beta testing! There is no Chinese version yet, and netizens are going crazy. For more information, please follow other related articles on the PHP Chinese website!