This is due to Nginx using the latest epoll (Linux 2.6 kernel) and kqueue (freebsd) network I/O model, while Apache The traditional select model is used. (Recommended learning: nginx tutorial)
Currently, Squid and Memcached under Linux that can withstand high concurrent access use the epoll network I/O model.
To handle the reading and writing of a large number of connections, the select network I/O model used by Apache is very inefficient.
The following uses a metaphor to analyze the difference between the select model used by Apache and the epoll model used by Nginx:
Assume you are studying in college, The dormitory building you live in has many rooms, and your friends are coming to find you.
select version The hostess will take your friends from room to room until they find you.
The epoll version of the dormitory aunt will first write down the room number of each student. When your friend comes, you only need to tell your friend which room you live in, without having to bring your friend with you personally. Searching the building for people.
If 10,000 people come and want to find their classmates who live in this building, it is self-evident who is more efficient in the select version or the epoll version of the dormitory aunt.
Similarly, in high-concurrency servers, polling I/O is one of the most time-consuming operations. It is also very clear which performance is higher between select and epoll.
The above is the detailed content of Is there much difference in performance between apache and nginx?. For more information, please follow other related articles on the PHP Chinese website!

NGINXUnitischosenfordeployingapplicationsduetoitsflexibility,easeofuse,andabilitytohandledynamicapplications.1)ItsupportsmultipleprogramminglanguageslikePython,PHP,Node.js,andJava.2)Itallowsdynamicreconfigurationwithoutdowntime.3)ItusesJSONforconfigu

NGINX can be used to serve files and manage traffic. 1) Configure NGINX service static files: define the listening port and file directory. 2) Implement load balancing and traffic management: Use upstream module and cache policies to optimize performance.

NGINX is suitable for handling high concurrency and static content, while Apache is suitable for dynamic content and complex URL rewrites. 1.NGINX adopts an event-driven model, suitable for high concurrency. 2. Apache uses process or thread model, which is suitable for dynamic content. 3. NGINX configuration is simple, Apache configuration is complex but more flexible.

NGINX and Apache each have their own advantages, and the choice depends on the specific needs. 1.NGINX is suitable for high concurrency, with simple deployment, and configuration examples include virtual hosts and reverse proxy. 2. Apache is suitable for complex configurations and is equally simple to deploy. Configuration examples include virtual hosts and URL rewrites.

The purpose of NGINXUnit is to simplify the deployment and management of web applications. Its advantages include: 1) Supports multiple programming languages, such as Python, PHP, Go, Java and Node.js; 2) Provides dynamic configuration and automatic reloading functions; 3) manages application lifecycle through a unified API; 4) Adopt an asynchronous I/O model to support high concurrency and load balancing.

NGINX started in 2002 and was developed by IgorSysoev to solve the C10k problem. 1.NGINX is a high-performance web server, an event-driven asynchronous architecture, suitable for high concurrency. 2. Provide advanced functions such as reverse proxy, load balancing and caching to improve system performance and reliability. 3. Optimization techniques include adjusting the number of worker processes, enabling Gzip compression, using HTTP/2 and security configuration.

The main architecture difference between NGINX and Apache is that NGINX adopts event-driven, asynchronous non-blocking model, while Apache uses process or thread model. 1) NGINX efficiently handles high-concurrent connections through event loops and I/O multiplexing mechanisms, suitable for static content and reverse proxy. 2) Apache adopts a multi-process or multi-threaded model, which is highly stable but has high resource consumption, and is suitable for scenarios where rich module expansion is required.

NGINX is suitable for handling high concurrent and static content, while Apache is suitable for complex configurations and dynamic content. 1. NGINX efficiently handles concurrent connections, suitable for high-traffic scenarios, but requires additional configuration when processing dynamic content. 2. Apache provides rich modules and flexible configurations, which are suitable for complex needs, but have poor high concurrency performance.


Hot AI Tools

Undresser.AI Undress
AI-powered app for creating realistic nude photos

AI Clothes Remover
Online AI tool for removing clothes from photos.

Undress AI Tool
Undress images for free

Clothoff.io
AI clothes remover

Video Face Swap
Swap faces in any video effortlessly with our completely free AI face swap tool!

Hot Article

Hot Tools

SublimeText3 Linux new version
SublimeText3 Linux latest version

Dreamweaver CS6
Visual web development tools

Dreamweaver Mac version
Visual web development tools

SecLists
SecLists is the ultimate security tester's companion. It is a collection of various types of lists that are frequently used during security assessments, all in one place. SecLists helps make security testing more efficient and productive by conveniently providing all the lists a security tester might need. List types include usernames, passwords, URLs, fuzzing payloads, sensitive data patterns, web shells, and more. The tester can simply pull this repository onto a new test machine and he will have access to every type of list he needs.

VSCode Windows 64-bit Download
A free and powerful IDE editor launched by Microsoft
