


UI thread blocking problem caused by Jquery ajax synchronization blocking_jquery
Recently working on a project, I encountered a problem of UI thread blocking caused by synchronized ajax. Let me share my problem solving process with you.
The reason is this, because there are multiple similar asynchronous request actions on the page. In order to improve the reusability of the code, I encapsulated a function called getData, which receives different parameters and is only responsible for obtaining data. , and then return the data. The basic logic stripped out is as follows:
function getData1(){ var result; $.ajax({ url : "p.php", async : false, success: function(data){ result = data; } }); return result; }
The ajax here cannot be asynchronous, otherwise when the function returns, the result has not been assigned a value, and an error will occur. So I added async:false. There seems to be no problem. I can get the data normally by calling this function.
$(".btn1").click(function(){ var data = getData1(); alert(data); });
Next, I want to add another function. Since the ajax request is time-consuming, I need to have a loading effect on the page before sending the request, that is, displaying a "loading" gif image. I think everyone will also Saw it. So my processing function becomes like this:
$(".btn1").click(function(){ $(".loadingicon").show(); var data = getData1(); $(".loadingicon").hide(); alert(data); });
Show the loading image before requesting and hide it after the request is completed. There seems to be no problem. In order to see the effect clearly, my p.php code sleeps for 3 seconds, as follows:
<?php sleep(3); echo ("aaaaaa"); ?>
But a problem occurred when I ran it. When I clicked the button, the loading image did not appear as expected, and the page did not respond at all. After troubleshooting for a long time, I found the reason, which is async:false.
The browser's rendering (UI) thread and the js thread are mutually exclusive. When executing js time-consuming operations, page rendering will be blocked. There is no problem when we execute asynchronous ajax, but when set to a synchronous request, other actions (the code behind the ajax function, and the rendering thread) will stop. Even if my DOM operation statement is the sentence before the request is initiated, this synchronization request will "quickly" block the UI thread without giving it time to execute. This is why the code fails.
setTimeout solves blocking problem
Now that we understand what the problem is, let’s find a solution. In order to prevent the synchronous ajax request from blocking the thread, I thought of setTimeout, put the request code in sestTimeout, and let the browser restart a thread to operate. Wouldn't the problem be solved? Ever since, my code became like this:
$(".btn2").click(function(){ $(".loadingicon").show(); setTimeout(function(){ $.ajax({ url : "p.php", async : false, success: function(data){ $(".loadingicon").hide(); alert(data); } }); }, 0); });
The second parameter of setTimeout is set to 0, and the browser will execute it after a set minimum time. No matter what, let's run it first and see.
The result loading picture is displayed, but! ! ! Why doesn't the picture move? It's obviously an animated gif. At this time, I quickly thought that although the synchronization request was delayed, it would still block the UI thread during its execution. This blocking is so awesome that even the gif image doesn’t move and looks like a static image.
The conclusion is obvious. SetTimeout treats the symptoms but not the root cause. It is equivalent to making the synchronization request "slightly" asynchronous. Then it will still enter a synchronization nightmare and block the thread. The plan failed.
It’s time to use Deferred
jQuery introduced the Deferred object after version 1.5, which provides a very convenient generalized asynchronous mechanism. For details, please refer to this article by teacher Ruan Yifeng http://www.ruanyifeng.com/blog/2011/08/a_detailed_explanation_of_jquery_deferred_object.html.
So I rewrote the code using Deferred objects, as follows:
function getData3(){ var defer = $.Deferred(); $.ajax({ url : "p.php", //async : false, success: function(data){ defer.resolve(data) } }); return defer.promise(); } $(".btn3").click(function(){ $(".loadingicon").show(); $.when(getData3()).done(function(data){ $(".loadingicon").hide(); alert(data); }); });
You can see that I removed async:false in the ajax request, which means that the request is asynchronous again. Please also pay attention to this sentence in the success function: defer.resolve(data). The resolve method of the Deferred object can pass in a parameter of any type. This parameter can be obtained in the done method, so the data we requested asynchronously can be returned in this way.
At this point, the problem has been solved. Deferred objects are so powerful and convenient, we can take advantage of them.
All my test codes are as follows, interested students can use them to test:
<button class="btn1">async:false</button> <button class="btn2">setTimeout</button> <button class="btn3">deferred</button> <img class="loadingicon" style="max-width:90%" src=http://www.update8.com/Web/Jquery/"loading2.gif" alt="正在加载" /> <script> function getData1(){ var result; $.ajax({ url : "p.php", async : false, success: function(data){ result = data; } }); return result; } $(".btn1").click(function(){ $(".loadingicon").show(); var data = getData1(); $(".loadingicon").hide(); alert(data); }); $(".btn2").click(function(){ $(".loadingicon").show(); setTimeout(function(){ $.ajax({ url : "p.php", async : false, success: function(data){ $(".loadingicon").hide(); alert(data); } }); }, 0); }); function getData3(){ var defer = $.Deferred(); $.ajax({ url : "p.php", //async : false, success: function(data){ defer.resolve(data) } }); return defer.promise(); } $(".btn3").click(function(){ $(".loadingicon").show(); $.when(getData3()).done(function(data){ $(".loadingicon").hide(); alert(data); }); });</script>
ps:Parameter description of $.ajax
Parameter Description
url required. Specifies the URL to which the request should be sent.
data is optional. Map or string value. Specifies the data to be sent to the server with the request.
success(data, textStatus, jqXHR) Optional. The callback function executed when the request is successful.
dataType
Optional. Specifies the data type of the expected server response.
Intelligent judgment is performed by default (xml, json, script or html).

The main difference between Python and JavaScript is the type system and application scenarios. 1. Python uses dynamic types, suitable for scientific computing and data analysis. 2. JavaScript adopts weak types and is widely used in front-end and full-stack development. The two have their own advantages in asynchronous programming and performance optimization, and should be decided according to project requirements when choosing.

Whether to choose Python or JavaScript depends on the project type: 1) Choose Python for data science and automation tasks; 2) Choose JavaScript for front-end and full-stack development. Python is favored for its powerful library in data processing and automation, while JavaScript is indispensable for its advantages in web interaction and full-stack development.

Python and JavaScript each have their own advantages, and the choice depends on project needs and personal preferences. 1. Python is easy to learn, with concise syntax, suitable for data science and back-end development, but has a slow execution speed. 2. JavaScript is everywhere in front-end development and has strong asynchronous programming capabilities. Node.js makes it suitable for full-stack development, but the syntax may be complex and error-prone.

JavaScriptisnotbuiltonCorC ;it'saninterpretedlanguagethatrunsonenginesoftenwritteninC .1)JavaScriptwasdesignedasalightweight,interpretedlanguageforwebbrowsers.2)EnginesevolvedfromsimpleinterpreterstoJITcompilers,typicallyinC ,improvingperformance.

JavaScript can be used for front-end and back-end development. The front-end enhances the user experience through DOM operations, and the back-end handles server tasks through Node.js. 1. Front-end example: Change the content of the web page text. 2. Backend example: Create a Node.js server.

Choosing Python or JavaScript should be based on career development, learning curve and ecosystem: 1) Career development: Python is suitable for data science and back-end development, while JavaScript is suitable for front-end and full-stack development. 2) Learning curve: Python syntax is concise and suitable for beginners; JavaScript syntax is flexible. 3) Ecosystem: Python has rich scientific computing libraries, and JavaScript has a powerful front-end framework.

The power of the JavaScript framework lies in simplifying development, improving user experience and application performance. When choosing a framework, consider: 1. Project size and complexity, 2. Team experience, 3. Ecosystem and community support.

Introduction I know you may find it strange, what exactly does JavaScript, C and browser have to do? They seem to be unrelated, but in fact, they play a very important role in modern web development. Today we will discuss the close connection between these three. Through this article, you will learn how JavaScript runs in the browser, the role of C in the browser engine, and how they work together to drive rendering and interaction of web pages. We all know the relationship between JavaScript and browser. JavaScript is the core language of front-end development. It runs directly in the browser, making web pages vivid and interesting. Have you ever wondered why JavaScr


Hot AI Tools

Undresser.AI Undress
AI-powered app for creating realistic nude photos

AI Clothes Remover
Online AI tool for removing clothes from photos.

Undress AI Tool
Undress images for free

Clothoff.io
AI clothes remover

Video Face Swap
Swap faces in any video effortlessly with our completely free AI face swap tool!

Hot Article

Hot Tools

SublimeText3 Mac version
God-level code editing software (SublimeText3)

Dreamweaver CS6
Visual web development tools

WebStorm Mac version
Useful JavaScript development tools

PhpStorm Mac version
The latest (2018.2.1) professional PHP integrated development tool

mPDF
mPDF is a PHP library that can generate PDF files from UTF-8 encoded HTML. The original author, Ian Back, wrote mPDF to output PDF files "on the fly" from his website and handle different languages. It is slower than original scripts like HTML2FPDF and produces larger files when using Unicode fonts, but supports CSS styles etc. and has a lot of enhancements. Supports almost all languages, including RTL (Arabic and Hebrew) and CJK (Chinese, Japanese and Korean). Supports nested block-level elements (such as P, DIV),
