Performance test of JSON.parse() and JSON.stringify() (example)
This article brings you the performance test (example) of JSON.parse() and JSON.stringify(). It has certain reference value. Friends in need can refer to it. I hope it will be helpful to you. helped.
JSON.parse(JSON.stringify(obj)) We generally use it for deep copying. To put it bluntly, the process is to use JSON.stringify to serialize js objects (JSON strings), and then use JSON.parse To deserialize (restore) js objects. As for why this line of code can achieve deep copy, what its limitations are, etc., this article does not introduce it. What this article wants to explore is, how efficient is the execution of this line of code? Will it cause any problems if used casually?
First two dependency functions for js performance testing
/** * 一个简单的断言函数 * @param value {Boolean} 断言条件 * @param desc {String} 一个消息 */ function assert(value, desc) { let li = document.createElement('li'); li.className = value ? 'pass' : 'fail'; li.appendChild(document.createTextNode(desc)); document.getElementById('results').appendChild(li); }
/** * 一个测试套件,定时器是为了多次执行减少误差 * @param fn {Function} 需要多次执行的代码块(需要测试、比对性能的代码块) * @param config {Object} 配置项,maxCount: 执行代码块的for循环次数,times: 定时器执行次数 */ function intervalTest(fn, config = {}) { let maxCount = config.maxCount || 1000; let times = config.times || 10; let timeArr = []; let timer = setInterval(function () { let start = new Date().getTime(); for (let i = 0; i p + c) / times; let p = document.createElement('p'); p.innerHTML = `for循环:${maxCount}次,定时器执行:${times}次,平均值:${average} ms`; document.body.appendChild(p); } }, 1000); }
Define some initial data
let jsonData = { title: 'hhhhh', dateArr: [], series: [ { name: 'line1', data: [] }, { name: 'line2', data: [] }, { name: 'line3', data: [] }, ] }; let res = [ { name: 'line1', value: 1 }, { name: 'line2', value: 2 }, { name: 'line3', value: 3 }, ];
Scenario 1: Simulate real-time update of chart data in a real environment
Data processing function
/** * 处理json数据的函数。模拟真实环境中图表数据实时更新 * @param lastData {Object} 上一次的数据 * @param res {Array} 当前数据 * @returns data 处理完成后的结果集 */ function handleJsonData(lastData, res) { // 1. 使用 JSON.parse(JSON.stringify()) 深拷贝 let data = JSON.parse(JSON.stringify(lastData)); // 2. 不使用JSON序列化,直接修改参数 // let data = lastData; if (data.dateArr.length > 60) { data.dateArr.shift(); for (let i = 0; i <h4 id="maxCount">maxCount=100</h4><p>Run it, first let maxCount=100, and loop for 100 times</p><pre class="brush:php;toolbar:false">let jsonTest = function () { jsonData = handleJsonData(jsonData, res); }; intervalTest(jsonTest, {maxCount: 100});
1. Use JSON.parse(JSON.stringify ()) The result of deep copy:
2. The result of directly modifying parameters without using JSON serialization:
function handleJsonData(lastData, res) { // 1. 使用 JSON.parse(JSON.stringify()) 深拷贝 // let data = JSON.parse(JSON.stringify(lastData)); // 2. 不使用JSON序列化,直接修改参数 let data = lastData; // ... }
maxCount=1000
intervalTest(jsonTest, {maxCount: 1000});
1. Use JSON.parse(JSON.stringify()) deep copy result:
2. Do not use JSON serialization, the result of directly modifying parameters:
maxCount=10000
intervalTest(jsonTest, {maxCount: 10000});
1. Use JSON.parse(JSON.stringify()) deep copy The result:
#2. Without using JSON serialization, the result of directly modifying the parameters:
Scenario 2: Determine whether an object is an empty object
// 1. 使用 JSON.stringify() 判断一个对象是否为空对象 let isEmptyObject1 = function () { if (JSON.stringify(jsonData) === '{}') { // do something } }; // 2. 使用 Object.keys().length 判断一个对象是否为空对象 let isEmptyObject2 = function () { if (Object.keys(jsonData).length === 0) { // do something } };
Just go through the judgment conditions, there is no execution code inside the if
maxCount=1000
1. Use JSON.stringify() to judge The result of whether an object is an empty object:
intervalTest(isEmptyObject1, {maxCount: 1000});
2. Use Object.keys().length to determine whether an object is an empty object. :
intervalTest(isEmptyObject2, {maxCount: 1000});
maxCount=10000
1. The result of using JSON.stringify() to determine whether an object is an empty object:
2. Use Object.keys().length to determine whether an object is an empty object. The result:
maxCount=100000
1. Use JSON.stringify() to determine whether an object is an empty object. The result:
2. Use Object.keys().length to determine whether an object is an empty object. The result:
The tests on JSON.parse() and JSON.stringify() end here. Changing parameters and changing the executed code block may have different results. , the above results are for reference only.
Small conclusion: If you can not use JSON.parse() and JSON.stringify(), just use alternatives with better performance. PS: Especially code blocks that need to be executed multiple times, especially when the JSON data is relatively large
There is more knowledge about JSON.parse() and JSON.stringify() waiting for you. Go dig and welcome everyone to communicate and learn together~
About JSON.parse(JSON.stringify(obj)): About the pitfalls that should be paid attention to when implementing deep copy of JSON.parse(JSON.stringify(obj))
About deep copy: The ultimate exploration of deep copy (99% of people don’t know)
The above is the detailed content of Performance test of JSON.parse() and JSON.stringify() (example). For more information, please follow other related articles on the PHP Chinese website!

The main difference between Python and JavaScript is the type system and application scenarios. 1. Python uses dynamic types, suitable for scientific computing and data analysis. 2. JavaScript adopts weak types and is widely used in front-end and full-stack development. The two have their own advantages in asynchronous programming and performance optimization, and should be decided according to project requirements when choosing.

Whether to choose Python or JavaScript depends on the project type: 1) Choose Python for data science and automation tasks; 2) Choose JavaScript for front-end and full-stack development. Python is favored for its powerful library in data processing and automation, while JavaScript is indispensable for its advantages in web interaction and full-stack development.

Python and JavaScript each have their own advantages, and the choice depends on project needs and personal preferences. 1. Python is easy to learn, with concise syntax, suitable for data science and back-end development, but has a slow execution speed. 2. JavaScript is everywhere in front-end development and has strong asynchronous programming capabilities. Node.js makes it suitable for full-stack development, but the syntax may be complex and error-prone.

JavaScriptisnotbuiltonCorC ;it'saninterpretedlanguagethatrunsonenginesoftenwritteninC .1)JavaScriptwasdesignedasalightweight,interpretedlanguageforwebbrowsers.2)EnginesevolvedfromsimpleinterpreterstoJITcompilers,typicallyinC ,improvingperformance.

JavaScript can be used for front-end and back-end development. The front-end enhances the user experience through DOM operations, and the back-end handles server tasks through Node.js. 1. Front-end example: Change the content of the web page text. 2. Backend example: Create a Node.js server.

Choosing Python or JavaScript should be based on career development, learning curve and ecosystem: 1) Career development: Python is suitable for data science and back-end development, while JavaScript is suitable for front-end and full-stack development. 2) Learning curve: Python syntax is concise and suitable for beginners; JavaScript syntax is flexible. 3) Ecosystem: Python has rich scientific computing libraries, and JavaScript has a powerful front-end framework.

The power of the JavaScript framework lies in simplifying development, improving user experience and application performance. When choosing a framework, consider: 1. Project size and complexity, 2. Team experience, 3. Ecosystem and community support.

Introduction I know you may find it strange, what exactly does JavaScript, C and browser have to do? They seem to be unrelated, but in fact, they play a very important role in modern web development. Today we will discuss the close connection between these three. Through this article, you will learn how JavaScript runs in the browser, the role of C in the browser engine, and how they work together to drive rendering and interaction of web pages. We all know the relationship between JavaScript and browser. JavaScript is the core language of front-end development. It runs directly in the browser, making web pages vivid and interesting. Have you ever wondered why JavaScr


Hot AI Tools

Undresser.AI Undress
AI-powered app for creating realistic nude photos

AI Clothes Remover
Online AI tool for removing clothes from photos.

Undress AI Tool
Undress images for free

Clothoff.io
AI clothes remover

Video Face Swap
Swap faces in any video effortlessly with our completely free AI face swap tool!

Hot Article

Hot Tools

Dreamweaver Mac version
Visual web development tools

SublimeText3 Mac version
God-level code editing software (SublimeText3)

EditPlus Chinese cracked version
Small size, syntax highlighting, does not support code prompt function

MinGW - Minimalist GNU for Windows
This project is in the process of being migrated to osdn.net/projects/mingw, you can continue to follow us there. MinGW: A native Windows port of the GNU Compiler Collection (GCC), freely distributable import libraries and header files for building native Windows applications; includes extensions to the MSVC runtime to support C99 functionality. All MinGW software can run on 64-bit Windows platforms.

SecLists
SecLists is the ultimate security tester's companion. It is a collection of various types of lists that are frequently used during security assessments, all in one place. SecLists helps make security testing more efficient and productive by conveniently providing all the lists a security tester might need. List types include usernames, passwords, URLs, fuzzing payloads, sensitive data patterns, web shells, and more. The tester can simply pull this repository onto a new test machine and he will have access to every type of list he needs.
