


Detailed explanation of the difference between style.width and offsetWidth in js
As a beginner, I often encounter the confusion of whether to use style.width or offsetWidth when getting the width (height, top value...) of a certain element. This article. I will bring you an article based on the difference between style.width and offsetWidth in js (detailed explanation). The editor thinks it is quite good, so I will share it with you now and give it as a reference for everyone. I hope everyone can better understand the difference between style.width and offsetWidth in js.
1. When the style is written inline, such as
, you can use style.width or offsetWidth to get the width of the element.
However, when the style is written in the style sheet, such as #box{ width: 100px; }, offsetWidth can only be used to obtain the width of the element, and the value returned by style.width is empty.
2. style.width The width of the element obtained is only the width of p, excluding the width occupied by border, and padding, and the width value is in px of.
offsetWidth The width of the element obtained is the value of width+border+padding (excluding margin), and the return value is only a numerical value without a unit.
As shown in the following example:
<head> <script> window.onload = function(){ var box = document.getElementById('box'); console.log(box.style.width); console.log(box.offsetWidth); } </script> </head> <body> <p id="box" style="width:300px; height: 300px; padding:3px; margin: 1px; border: 1px solid red;"></p> </body>
The first result output by the console is : 300px
The second result output by the console is: 308 Note: 300+ 3x2 +1x2 = 308, without unit
##3. style.width can also be used to set the width of elements in js, but offsetWidth cannot.
As shown in the following example:<script> window.onload = function(){ var box = document.getElementById('box'); box.style.width = '200px'; console.log(box.offsetWidth); console.log(box.style.width); box.offsetWidth = '400px'; console.log(box.offsetWidth); console.log(box.style.width); } </script> </head> <body> <p id="box" style="width:300px; height: 300px; padding:3px; margin: 2px; border: 1px solid red;"></p> </body>The console output results are 208 200px 208 200pxThat is to say, through Style.width sets the width successfully, but setting the width through offsetWidth fails. Related recommendations:
Summary of some compatibility and error-prone issues in js
Discussion on components and templates in Vue.js
Detailed explanation of functions apply and call in Js
The above is the detailed content of Detailed explanation of the difference between style.width and offsetWidth in js. For more information, please follow other related articles on the PHP Chinese website!

Introduction I know you may find it strange, what exactly does JavaScript, C and browser have to do? They seem to be unrelated, but in fact, they play a very important role in modern web development. Today we will discuss the close connection between these three. Through this article, you will learn how JavaScript runs in the browser, the role of C in the browser engine, and how they work together to drive rendering and interaction of web pages. We all know the relationship between JavaScript and browser. JavaScript is the core language of front-end development. It runs directly in the browser, making web pages vivid and interesting. Have you ever wondered why JavaScr

Node.js excels at efficient I/O, largely thanks to streams. Streams process data incrementally, avoiding memory overload—ideal for large files, network tasks, and real-time applications. Combining streams with TypeScript's type safety creates a powe

The differences in performance and efficiency between Python and JavaScript are mainly reflected in: 1) As an interpreted language, Python runs slowly but has high development efficiency and is suitable for rapid prototype development; 2) JavaScript is limited to single thread in the browser, but multi-threading and asynchronous I/O can be used to improve performance in Node.js, and both have advantages in actual projects.

JavaScript originated in 1995 and was created by Brandon Ike, and realized the language into C. 1.C language provides high performance and system-level programming capabilities for JavaScript. 2. JavaScript's memory management and performance optimization rely on C language. 3. The cross-platform feature of C language helps JavaScript run efficiently on different operating systems.

JavaScript runs in browsers and Node.js environments and relies on the JavaScript engine to parse and execute code. 1) Generate abstract syntax tree (AST) in the parsing stage; 2) convert AST into bytecode or machine code in the compilation stage; 3) execute the compiled code in the execution stage.

The future trends of Python and JavaScript include: 1. Python will consolidate its position in the fields of scientific computing and AI, 2. JavaScript will promote the development of web technology, 3. Cross-platform development will become a hot topic, and 4. Performance optimization will be the focus. Both will continue to expand application scenarios in their respective fields and make more breakthroughs in performance.

Both Python and JavaScript's choices in development environments are important. 1) Python's development environment includes PyCharm, JupyterNotebook and Anaconda, which are suitable for data science and rapid prototyping. 2) The development environment of JavaScript includes Node.js, VSCode and Webpack, which are suitable for front-end and back-end development. Choosing the right tools according to project needs can improve development efficiency and project success rate.

Yes, the engine core of JavaScript is written in C. 1) The C language provides efficient performance and underlying control, which is suitable for the development of JavaScript engine. 2) Taking the V8 engine as an example, its core is written in C, combining the efficiency and object-oriented characteristics of C. 3) The working principle of the JavaScript engine includes parsing, compiling and execution, and the C language plays a key role in these processes.


Hot AI Tools

Undresser.AI Undress
AI-powered app for creating realistic nude photos

AI Clothes Remover
Online AI tool for removing clothes from photos.

Undress AI Tool
Undress images for free

Clothoff.io
AI clothes remover

Video Face Swap
Swap faces in any video effortlessly with our completely free AI face swap tool!

Hot Article

Hot Tools

WebStorm Mac version
Useful JavaScript development tools

Dreamweaver Mac version
Visual web development tools

ZendStudio 13.5.1 Mac
Powerful PHP integrated development environment

PhpStorm Mac version
The latest (2018.2.1) professional PHP integrated development tool

EditPlus Chinese cracked version
Small size, syntax highlighting, does not support code prompt function
