


Example of implicit conversion mechanism of double equal sign in Javascript
In Javascript, there are two types of equality signs: double equal sign (==) and triple equal sign (===). The double equal sign (==) indicates value equality, while the triple equal sign (===) indicates strict equality (whether the values and types are completely equal).
So there are some common sense knowledge:
1. For basic types such as string, number, == and === are different
1) Comparison between different types, == compares "values converted into the same type" to see if the "values" are equal, === if the types are different, the result is unequal
2) Comparison of the same type, directly Compare "value" and the result is the same
2. For advanced types such as Array and Object, there is no difference between == and ===
Compare "pointer address"
3. There is a difference between basic types and advanced types, == and ===
1) For ==, convert the advanced types into basic types and perform "value" comparison
2) Because the types are different, = The result of == is false
In other words, the double equal sign (==) will perform type conversion during operation, while the triple equal sign (== =) No.
For example:
alert('55' == 55); //true alert('55' === 55); //false
Five basic data types in Javascript language (original value, also called simple data type): namely Undefined, Null, Boolean, Number and String types. Since these primitive types occupy a fixed amount of space, they can be stored in a smaller area of memory - the stack. This storage makes it easy to quickly look up the value of the variable. (For details, see: http://www.w3school.com.cn/js/pro_js_value.asp)
The implicit conversion mechanism using the double equal sign (==) in Javascript to determine equality:
1, if both sides are simple types:
1,1, both sides are simple types and the types are the same, then compare directly.
console.log(1==1); //true console.log("1"=="1"); //true console.log(false==false); //true console.log(null==null); //true console.log(undefined==undefined); //true
1.2. Both sides are simple types. If the types are different, they will be converted to numerical comparison first (Boolean has only two values: true==1, false==0; null and undefined are equal; String Number is equal to numeric value, empty string ""==0;)
console.log(1==true); //true console.log(0==false); //true console.log(1=="1"); //true console.log(0==""); //true console.log(0==null); //false console.log(0==undefined); //false console.log(null==undefined); //true
2, if one side is a simple type and the other side is a reference type (advanced type), the advanced type is implicit Convert to a simple type and compare.
console.log(Object==Object); //true console.log(Object=={}); //false console.log(0=={}); //false console.log(0==[]); //true console.log(Array==Array); //true console.log(Object==Array); //false
3, if both sides are reference types (advanced types), "pointer address" comparison is performed.
Key points-toString() and valueOf()
The first impression many people have when seeing these two methods is that the toString() method converts an object into a string, and the valueOf method converts it into a string. Convert an object to a numeric value.
This idea is very one-sided. Let’s take a look at the following two examples:
var obj={ name:"熊仔其人", getName:function(){ return $(this).name; } }; console.log(obj.toString()); //[object Object]
Define an obj object, call its toString method, the return value is [object Object], and find that does not return a string representation of its contents as we thought.
var arr=[1,2,3]; console.log(arr.valueOf()); //(3) [1, 2, 3]
Define an array arr, call its valueOf method, the return value is [1, 2, 3], and find that the representation of numeric type is not returned as we imagined.
In fact, the real understanding is this: calling the object's toString() method can convert the object into a string, but if you want to convert it into a string, you do not necessarily have to call the toString method.
Let’s take a look at the code below.
var obj= { }; obj.valueOf=function(){ return 1; } obj.toString=function(){ return 2; } console.log(obj==1); //truevar obj2= { }; obj2.valueOf=function(){ return 2; } obj2.toString=function(){ return 1; } console.log(obj2==1); //false var obj3={ }; obj3.valueOf=function(){ return []; } obj3.toString=function(){ return 1; } console.log(obj3==1); //true
In the above code, we defined an object obj, obj2, and defined the return value of the valueOf and toString methods. By comparing it with 1 for equality, we found that the valueOf method was called first.
Then an object obj3 is defined, and the return value of the valueOf and toString methods is defined. By comparing it with 1, it is found that it calls the toString method.
Then let's look at the following piece of code:
var obj= { }; obj.valueOf=function(){ return 'a'; } obj.toString=function(){ return 2; } console.log(obj=='a'); //truevar obj2= { }; obj2.valueOf=function(){ return 'b'; } obj2.toString=function(){ return 'a'; } console.log(obj2=='a'); //false
An object obj is defined in the above code 2. By comparing it with the string 'a', it is found that it calls the valueOf method.
Then the comparison between object obj2 and 'a' returns false, and it is found that the toString method is not called.
From this we can draw the conclusion:
When the object is converted to a simple type, the valueOf method will be called first. If it can be compared with a simple value, it will be compared directly. The toString method is no longer called at this time. If the valueOf method cannot be compared with a simple value after calling the valueOf method, the toString method will be called again to finally get the comparison result.
But one thing to note is that the Date object does not meet the above rules. The toString and valueOf methods of the Date object have been redefined, and the toString method will be called by default.
The above is the detailed content of Example of implicit conversion mechanism of double equal sign in Javascript. For more information, please follow other related articles on the PHP Chinese website!

JavaScript's application in the real world includes front-end and back-end development. 1) Display front-end applications by building a TODO list application, involving DOM operations and event processing. 2) Build RESTfulAPI through Node.js and Express to demonstrate back-end applications.

The main uses of JavaScript in web development include client interaction, form verification and asynchronous communication. 1) Dynamic content update and user interaction through DOM operations; 2) Client verification is carried out before the user submits data to improve the user experience; 3) Refreshless communication with the server is achieved through AJAX technology.

Understanding how JavaScript engine works internally is important to developers because it helps write more efficient code and understand performance bottlenecks and optimization strategies. 1) The engine's workflow includes three stages: parsing, compiling and execution; 2) During the execution process, the engine will perform dynamic optimization, such as inline cache and hidden classes; 3) Best practices include avoiding global variables, optimizing loops, using const and lets, and avoiding excessive use of closures.

Python is more suitable for beginners, with a smooth learning curve and concise syntax; JavaScript is suitable for front-end development, with a steep learning curve and flexible syntax. 1. Python syntax is intuitive and suitable for data science and back-end development. 2. JavaScript is flexible and widely used in front-end and server-side programming.

Python and JavaScript have their own advantages and disadvantages in terms of community, libraries and resources. 1) The Python community is friendly and suitable for beginners, but the front-end development resources are not as rich as JavaScript. 2) Python is powerful in data science and machine learning libraries, while JavaScript is better in front-end development libraries and frameworks. 3) Both have rich learning resources, but Python is suitable for starting with official documents, while JavaScript is better with MDNWebDocs. The choice should be based on project needs and personal interests.

The shift from C/C to JavaScript requires adapting to dynamic typing, garbage collection and asynchronous programming. 1) C/C is a statically typed language that requires manual memory management, while JavaScript is dynamically typed and garbage collection is automatically processed. 2) C/C needs to be compiled into machine code, while JavaScript is an interpreted language. 3) JavaScript introduces concepts such as closures, prototype chains and Promise, which enhances flexibility and asynchronous programming capabilities.

Different JavaScript engines have different effects when parsing and executing JavaScript code, because the implementation principles and optimization strategies of each engine differ. 1. Lexical analysis: convert source code into lexical unit. 2. Grammar analysis: Generate an abstract syntax tree. 3. Optimization and compilation: Generate machine code through the JIT compiler. 4. Execute: Run the machine code. V8 engine optimizes through instant compilation and hidden class, SpiderMonkey uses a type inference system, resulting in different performance performance on the same code.

JavaScript's applications in the real world include server-side programming, mobile application development and Internet of Things control: 1. Server-side programming is realized through Node.js, suitable for high concurrent request processing. 2. Mobile application development is carried out through ReactNative and supports cross-platform deployment. 3. Used for IoT device control through Johnny-Five library, suitable for hardware interaction.


Hot AI Tools

Undresser.AI Undress
AI-powered app for creating realistic nude photos

AI Clothes Remover
Online AI tool for removing clothes from photos.

Undress AI Tool
Undress images for free

Clothoff.io
AI clothes remover

Video Face Swap
Swap faces in any video effortlessly with our completely free AI face swap tool!

Hot Article

Hot Tools

SublimeText3 Linux new version
SublimeText3 Linux latest version

Dreamweaver Mac version
Visual web development tools

ZendStudio 13.5.1 Mac
Powerful PHP integrated development environment

SecLists
SecLists is the ultimate security tester's companion. It is a collection of various types of lists that are frequently used during security assessments, all in one place. SecLists helps make security testing more efficient and productive by conveniently providing all the lists a security tester might need. List types include usernames, passwords, URLs, fuzzing payloads, sensitive data patterns, web shells, and more. The tester can simply pull this repository onto a new test machine and he will have access to every type of list he needs.

SublimeText3 Mac version
God-level code editing software (SublimeText3)