rem
The new rem in css3 is a very popular unit now. Take a look at the description on MDN:
This unit represents the
font-size
size of the root element (for example, the font-size of theelement) .
Use this unit to create a perfect scalable layout. Just modify the font-size of the HTML according to the page size to adapt to the entire page. So the question is, how to make the font-size of HTML adaptive?
Media Query
I won’t go into details about the usage of media here. I will simply explain how to modify the font-size of HTML through media query to achieve the purpose of page adaptation.
The html is as follows:
##
<article class="container"> <ol> <li>rem是相对于root元素(html)字体大小的一个单位。 eg:html默认font-size为16px 则1rem = 16px</li> <li>若元素以rem为单位去设置字体、宽高、边距等。则修改html字体大小就能达到所有元素一起等比例修改的效果</li> <li>所以要实现html字体在不同页面大小下自适应</li> </ol> </article>
The css is as follows:
//媒体查询控制html字体大小 @media (max-width:767px) { html{ font-size: 14px; } } @media (min-width:768px) { html{ font-size: 16px; } } @media (min-width:992px) { html{ font-size: 20px; } } //页面元素的简单样式 .container{ padding: 1rem; } li{ font-size: 1rem; }
Through media query, the font-size of HTML is set differently on pages with different size ranges;
css is as follows:
html{ font-size: calc(16/768*100vw); //以768时16px为标准进行缩放 }
The 768px in the example is an assumed standard value. Generally, the size of the design draft is standard, and then Adapt again. Adjust the page size to be fully adaptive.
(function(){ var doc = document.documentElement, resizeEvt = 'orientationchange' in window ? 'orientationchange' : 'resize'; function changeFontSize(){ var clietWidth = doc.offsetWidth, scale = clietWidth/768; //以768为标准 doc.style.fontSize = scale * 16 + 'px'; } if (!doc.addEventListener) return; window.addEventListener(resizeEvt,changeFontSize) //窗口大小变化或者手机横屏 document.addEventListener('DOMContentLoaded',changeFontSize) //加载页面触发 })()
1. Get the viewport width
based on the change of the viewport width to the standard
The above is the detailed content of rem absolute adaptive solution analysis. For more information, please follow other related articles on the PHP Chinese website!

The main difference between Python and JavaScript is the type system and application scenarios. 1. Python uses dynamic types, suitable for scientific computing and data analysis. 2. JavaScript adopts weak types and is widely used in front-end and full-stack development. The two have their own advantages in asynchronous programming and performance optimization, and should be decided according to project requirements when choosing.

Whether to choose Python or JavaScript depends on the project type: 1) Choose Python for data science and automation tasks; 2) Choose JavaScript for front-end and full-stack development. Python is favored for its powerful library in data processing and automation, while JavaScript is indispensable for its advantages in web interaction and full-stack development.

Python and JavaScript each have their own advantages, and the choice depends on project needs and personal preferences. 1. Python is easy to learn, with concise syntax, suitable for data science and back-end development, but has a slow execution speed. 2. JavaScript is everywhere in front-end development and has strong asynchronous programming capabilities. Node.js makes it suitable for full-stack development, but the syntax may be complex and error-prone.

JavaScriptisnotbuiltonCorC ;it'saninterpretedlanguagethatrunsonenginesoftenwritteninC .1)JavaScriptwasdesignedasalightweight,interpretedlanguageforwebbrowsers.2)EnginesevolvedfromsimpleinterpreterstoJITcompilers,typicallyinC ,improvingperformance.

JavaScript can be used for front-end and back-end development. The front-end enhances the user experience through DOM operations, and the back-end handles server tasks through Node.js. 1. Front-end example: Change the content of the web page text. 2. Backend example: Create a Node.js server.

Choosing Python or JavaScript should be based on career development, learning curve and ecosystem: 1) Career development: Python is suitable for data science and back-end development, while JavaScript is suitable for front-end and full-stack development. 2) Learning curve: Python syntax is concise and suitable for beginners; JavaScript syntax is flexible. 3) Ecosystem: Python has rich scientific computing libraries, and JavaScript has a powerful front-end framework.

The power of the JavaScript framework lies in simplifying development, improving user experience and application performance. When choosing a framework, consider: 1. Project size and complexity, 2. Team experience, 3. Ecosystem and community support.

Introduction I know you may find it strange, what exactly does JavaScript, C and browser have to do? They seem to be unrelated, but in fact, they play a very important role in modern web development. Today we will discuss the close connection between these three. Through this article, you will learn how JavaScript runs in the browser, the role of C in the browser engine, and how they work together to drive rendering and interaction of web pages. We all know the relationship between JavaScript and browser. JavaScript is the core language of front-end development. It runs directly in the browser, making web pages vivid and interesting. Have you ever wondered why JavaScr


Hot AI Tools

Undresser.AI Undress
AI-powered app for creating realistic nude photos

AI Clothes Remover
Online AI tool for removing clothes from photos.

Undress AI Tool
Undress images for free

Clothoff.io
AI clothes remover

Video Face Swap
Swap faces in any video effortlessly with our completely free AI face swap tool!

Hot Article

Hot Tools

SublimeText3 Mac version
God-level code editing software (SublimeText3)

Dreamweaver CS6
Visual web development tools

WebStorm Mac version
Useful JavaScript development tools

PhpStorm Mac version
The latest (2018.2.1) professional PHP integrated development tool

mPDF
mPDF is a PHP library that can generate PDF files from UTF-8 encoded HTML. The original author, Ian Back, wrote mPDF to output PDF files "on the fly" from his website and handle different languages. It is slower than original scripts like HTML2FPDF and produces larger files when using Unicode fonts, but supports CSS styles etc. and has a lot of enhancements. Supports almost all languages, including RTL (Arabic and Hebrew) and CJK (Chinese, Japanese and Korean). Supports nested block-level elements (such as P, DIV),
