Sharing on performance comparison of template engines in Java

This article mainly introduces a brief discussion on the performance comparison of Java template engines. The editor thinks it is quite good. Now I will share it with you and give it as a reference. Let’s follow the editor and take a look.

From Github, I found the performance comparison of several mainstream templates such as JSP, Thymeleaf 3, Velocity 1.7, and Freemarker 2.3.23. Overall, Freemarker, Velocity, and JSP have the highest performance There is not much difference in performance, but there is a big gap in performance between Thymeleaf and the first three. Therefore, you need to be careful when choosing Thymeleaf as a template engine.

System Configuration

Architecture: x86_64
CPU op-mode(s): 32-bit, 64-bit
Byte Order: Little Endian
CPU(s): 4
On-line CPU(s) list: 0-3
Thread(s) per core: 2
Core(s) per socket: 2
Socket(s): 1
NUMA node(s): 1
Vendor ID: GenuineIntel
CPU family: 6
Model: 37
Model name: Intel(R) Core(TM) i5 CPU M 430 @ 2.27GHz
Stepping: 2
CPU MHz: 1199.000
CPU max MHz: 2267.0000
CPU min MHz: 1199.0000
BogoMIPS: 4522.04
Virtualization: VT-x
L1d cache: 32K
L1i cache: 32K
L2 cache: 256K
L3 cache: 3072K
NUMA node0 CPU(s): 0-3

JSP

Document Path: /jsp
Document Length: 8515 bytes
Concurrency Level: 25
Time taken for tests: 13.003 seconds
Complete requests: 25000
Failed requests: 0
Keep-Alive requests: 0
Total transferred: 218825000 bytes
HTML transferred: 212875000 bytes
Requests per second: 1922.59 (#/sec) (mean)
Time per request: 13.003 (ms) (mean)
Time per request: 0.520 (ms) (mean, across all concurrent requests)
Transfer rate: 16434.05 (Kbytes/sec) received

Thymeleaf 3

##

Document Path: /thymeleaf
Document Length: 8849 bytes
Concurrency Level: 25
Time taken for tests: 23.303 seconds
Complete requests: 25000
Failed requests: 0
Keep-Alive requests: 0
Total transferred: 225300000 bytes
HTML transferred: 221225000 bytes
Requests per second: 1072.80 (#/sec) (mean)
Time per request: 23.303 (ms) (mean)
Time per request: 0.932 (ms) (mean, across all concurrent requests)
Transfer rate: 9441.52 (Kbytes/sec) received

Velocity 1.7

Document Path: /velocity
Document Length: 8951 bytes
Concurrency Level: 25
Time taken for tests: 13.200 seconds
Complete requests: 25000
Failed requests: 0
Keep-Alive requests: 0
Total transferred: 227975000 bytes
HTML transferred: 223775000 bytes
Requests per second: 1893.92 (#/sec) (mean)
Time per request: 13.200 (ms) (mean)
Time per request: 0.528 (ms) (mean, across all concurrent requests)
Transfer rate: 16865.88 (Kbytes/sec) received

Freemarker 2.3.23

Document Path: /freemarker
Document Length: 9035 bytes
Concurrency Level: 25
Time taken for tests: 12.988 seconds
Complete requests: 25000
Failed requests: 0
Keep-Alive requests: 0
Total transferred: 230075000 bytes
HTML transferred: 225875000 bytes
Requests per second: 1924.83 (#/sec) (mean)
Time per request: 12.988 (ms) (mean)
Time per request: 0.520 (ms) (mean, across all concurrent requests)
Transfer rate: 17299.01 (Kbytes/sec) received

The above is the detailed content of Sharing on performance comparison of template engines in Java. For more information, please follow other related articles on the PHP Chinese website!