


Detailed explanation of the usage and disadvantages of JavaScript prototype chain inheritance method
Prototype chain method
function Person(){ this.name = 'Simon'; } Person.prototype.say = function(){ alert('My name is '+this.name); } function F2E(id){ this.id = id; this.showId = function(){ alert('Good morning,Sir,My work number is '+this.id); } } F2E.prototype = new Person(); var simon = new F2E(9527); simon.say(); simon.showId(); alert(simon.hasOwnProperty('id')); //检查是否为自身属性
Next, follow the above example to understand the following js prototype chain concept:
The prototype chain can be understood as: each object in js There is a hidden __proto__ attribute. The __proto__ attribute of an instantiated object points to the prototype method of its class, and this prototype method can be assigned to another instantiated object. The __proto__ of this object needs to point to Its class forms a chain, that is, the sentence
F2E.prototype = new Person()
in the previous code is the key. When a js object reads a certain attribute, it will first search for its own attributes. If there are no attributes, it will then search for the attributes of the object on the prototype chain. In other words, the prototype chain method can be shared, which solves the problem of object impersonation and wasting memory.
Let’s talk about the shortcomings:
The shortcomings are obvious. Prototype chain inheritance means that parameters cannot be passed to the parent class when instantiating a subclass, which is why function Person is used in this example. () has no parameters, but is directly written as this.name="Simon". The following code will not achieve the expected results:
function Person(name){ this.name = name; } Person.prototype.say = function(){ alert('My name is '+this.name); } function F2E(name,id){ this.id = id; this.showId = function(){ alert('Good morning,Sir,My work number is '+this.id); } } F2E.prototype = new Person(); var simon = new F2E("Simon",9527); simon.say(); simon.showId(); function Person(name){ this.name = name; } Person.prototype.say = function(){ alert('My name is '+this.name); } function F2E(name,id){ this.id = id; this.showId = function(){ alert('Good morning,Sir,My work number is '+this.id); } } F2E.prototype = new Person(); //此处无法进行传值,this.name或者name都不行,直接写F2E.prototype = new Person('wood')是可以的,但是这样的话simon.say()就变成了My name is wood var simon = new F2E("Simon",9527); simon.say(); //弹出 My name is undefined simon.showId();
Finally, let’s summarize the inheritance implementation method that I think is better. Member variables use object impersonation, and member methods use prototype chaining. The code is as follows:
function Person(name){ this.name = name; } Person.prototype.say = function(){ alert('My name is '+this.name); } function F2E(name,id){ Person.call(this,name); this.id = id; } F2E.prototype = new Person(); //此处注意一个细节,showId不能写在F2E.prototype = new Person();前面 F2E.prototype.showId = function(){ alert('Good morning,Sir,My work number is '+this.id); } var simon = new F2E("Simon",9527); simon.say(); simon.showId();
The above is the detailed content of Detailed explanation of the usage and disadvantages of JavaScript prototype chain inheritance method. For more information, please follow other related articles on the PHP Chinese website!

The main difference between Python and JavaScript is the type system and application scenarios. 1. Python uses dynamic types, suitable for scientific computing and data analysis. 2. JavaScript adopts weak types and is widely used in front-end and full-stack development. The two have their own advantages in asynchronous programming and performance optimization, and should be decided according to project requirements when choosing.

Whether to choose Python or JavaScript depends on the project type: 1) Choose Python for data science and automation tasks; 2) Choose JavaScript for front-end and full-stack development. Python is favored for its powerful library in data processing and automation, while JavaScript is indispensable for its advantages in web interaction and full-stack development.

Python and JavaScript each have their own advantages, and the choice depends on project needs and personal preferences. 1. Python is easy to learn, with concise syntax, suitable for data science and back-end development, but has a slow execution speed. 2. JavaScript is everywhere in front-end development and has strong asynchronous programming capabilities. Node.js makes it suitable for full-stack development, but the syntax may be complex and error-prone.

JavaScriptisnotbuiltonCorC ;it'saninterpretedlanguagethatrunsonenginesoftenwritteninC .1)JavaScriptwasdesignedasalightweight,interpretedlanguageforwebbrowsers.2)EnginesevolvedfromsimpleinterpreterstoJITcompilers,typicallyinC ,improvingperformance.

JavaScript can be used for front-end and back-end development. The front-end enhances the user experience through DOM operations, and the back-end handles server tasks through Node.js. 1. Front-end example: Change the content of the web page text. 2. Backend example: Create a Node.js server.

Choosing Python or JavaScript should be based on career development, learning curve and ecosystem: 1) Career development: Python is suitable for data science and back-end development, while JavaScript is suitable for front-end and full-stack development. 2) Learning curve: Python syntax is concise and suitable for beginners; JavaScript syntax is flexible. 3) Ecosystem: Python has rich scientific computing libraries, and JavaScript has a powerful front-end framework.

The power of the JavaScript framework lies in simplifying development, improving user experience and application performance. When choosing a framework, consider: 1. Project size and complexity, 2. Team experience, 3. Ecosystem and community support.

Introduction I know you may find it strange, what exactly does JavaScript, C and browser have to do? They seem to be unrelated, but in fact, they play a very important role in modern web development. Today we will discuss the close connection between these three. Through this article, you will learn how JavaScript runs in the browser, the role of C in the browser engine, and how they work together to drive rendering and interaction of web pages. We all know the relationship between JavaScript and browser. JavaScript is the core language of front-end development. It runs directly in the browser, making web pages vivid and interesting. Have you ever wondered why JavaScr


Hot AI Tools

Undresser.AI Undress
AI-powered app for creating realistic nude photos

AI Clothes Remover
Online AI tool for removing clothes from photos.

Undress AI Tool
Undress images for free

Clothoff.io
AI clothes remover

Video Face Swap
Swap faces in any video effortlessly with our completely free AI face swap tool!

Hot Article

Hot Tools

Dreamweaver Mac version
Visual web development tools

SublimeText3 Mac version
God-level code editing software (SublimeText3)

EditPlus Chinese cracked version
Small size, syntax highlighting, does not support code prompt function

MinGW - Minimalist GNU for Windows
This project is in the process of being migrated to osdn.net/projects/mingw, you can continue to follow us there. MinGW: A native Windows port of the GNU Compiler Collection (GCC), freely distributable import libraries and header files for building native Windows applications; includes extensions to the MSVC runtime to support C99 functionality. All MinGW software can run on 64-bit Windows platforms.

SecLists
SecLists is the ultimate security tester's companion. It is a collection of various types of lists that are frequently used during security assessments, all in one place. SecLists helps make security testing more efficient and productive by conveniently providing all the lists a security tester might need. List types include usernames, passwords, URLs, fuzzing payloads, sensitive data patterns, web shells, and more. The tester can simply pull this repository onto a new test machine and he will have access to every type of list he needs.
