Why does jquery each run slower than js for loop?-JS Tutorial-php.cn

Home

Web Front-end

JS Tutorial

Why does jquery each run slower than js for loop?

伊谢尔伦

Jul 19, 2017 pm 01:54 PM

javascriptjquery

In fact, looking at the source code of jQuery, I found that the code of each is very simple, but why is the performance different from the native for loop by dozens of times?

The core code of each of jQuery

for (; i < length; i++) { 
value = callback.call(obj[i], i, obj[i]); 
if (value === false) { 
break; 
} 
}

Looks very simple, but why is it so much slower?

Write the test code as follows:

var length=300000; 
function GetArr() { 
var t = []; 
for (var i = 0; i < length; i++) { 
t[i] = i; 
} 
return t; 
} 
function each1(obj, callback) { 
var i = 0; 
var length = obj.length 
for (; i < length; i++) { 
value = callback(i, obj[i]); 
/* if ( value === false ) {去掉了判断 
break; 
}*/ 
} 
} 
function each2(obj, callback) { 
var i = 0; 
var length = obj.length 
for (; i < length; i++) { 
value = callback(i, obj[i]);/*去掉了call*/ 
if (value === false) { 
break; 
} 
} 
} 
function each3(obj, callback) { 
var i = 0; 
var length = obj.length 
for (; i < length; i++) { 
value = callback.call(obj[i], i, obj[i]);/*自己写的call*/ 
if (value === false) { 
break; 
} 
} 
} 
function Test1() { 
var t = GetArr(); 
var date1 = new Date().getTime(); 
var lengtharr = t.length; 
var total = 0; 
each1(t, function (i, n) { 
total += n; 
}); 
var date12 = new Date().getTime(); 
console.log("1Test" + ((date12 - date1))); 
} 
function Test2() { 
var t = GetArr(); 
var date1 = new Date().getTime(); 
var total = 0; 
each2(t, function (i, n) { 
total += n; 
}); 
var date12 = new Date().getTime(); 
console.log("2Test" + ((date12 - date1))); 
} 
function Test3() { 
var t = GetArr(); 
var date1 = new Date().getTime(); 
var total = 0; 
each3(t, function (i, n) { 
total += n; 
}); 
var date12 = new Date().getTime(); 
console.log("3Test" + ((date12 - date1))); 
} 
function Test4() { 
var t = GetArr(); 
var date1 = new Date().getTime(); 
var total = 0; 
$.each(t, function (i, n) { 
total += n; 
}); 
var date12 = new Date().getTime(); 
console.log("4Test" + ((date12 - date1))); 
}

Run the test and find that the difference between the first and the second is not very big, which shows that due to the break judgment The resulting performance difference is very small, but the second, third, and fourth deviations are more than double. The only difference between the second and third is that call is called. It seems that call will cause performance loss. , because call will switch the context. Of course, there are other reasons why jQuery's each is slow. It also calls other methods in the loop. Call is just one reason.

Therefore, it can be said that call and apply are relatively performance-consuming methods in js. When performance requirements are strict, it is recommended to use them sparingly.

Let’s look at the performance comparison between jquery’s each and js native for loop through a piece of code

<html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"> 
<head runat="server"> 
<title>for与each性能比较</title> 
<script src="../Cks/jquery-1.7.1.min.js" type="text/javascript"></script> 
<script type="text/javascript" language="javascript"> 
function getSelectLength() { 
var time1 = new Date().getTime(); 
var len = $("#select_test").find("option").length; 
var selectObj = $("#select_test"); 
for (var i = 0; i < len; i++) { 
if (selectObj.get(0).options[i].text == "111111") { 
selectObj.get(0).options[i].selected = true; 
break; 
} 
} 
var time2 = new Date().getTime(); 
alert("for循环执行时间：" + (time2 - time1)); 
time1 = new Date().getTime(); 
$("#select_test").find("option").each(function () { 
if ($(this).text() == "111111") { 
$(this)[0].selected = true; 
} 
}); 
time2 = new Date().getTime(); 
alert("each循环执行时间：" + (time2 - time1)); 
} 
</script> 
</head> 
<body> 
<form id="form1" runat="server"> 
<p><select id="select_test"> 
<option value=&#39;1&#39;>111111</option> 
<option value=&#39;2&#39;>222222</option> 
<option value=&#39;3&#39;>333333</option> 
<option value=&#39;4&#39;>444444</option> 
<option value=&#39;5&#39;>5</option> 
<option value=&#39;6&#39;>6</option> 
<option value=&#39;7&#39;>7</option> 
<option value=&#39;8&#39;>8</option> 
<option value=&#39;9&#39;>9</option> 
<option value=&#39;10&#39;>10</option> 
<option value=&#39;11&#39;>11</option> 
<option value=&#39;12&#39;>12</option> 
<option value=&#39;13&#39;>13</option> 
<option value=&#39;14&#39;>14</option> 
<option value=&#39;15&#39;>15</option> 
<option value=&#39;16&#39;>16</option> 
<option value=&#39;17&#39;>17</option> 
<option value=&#39;18&#39;>18</option> 
<option value=&#39;19&#39;>19</option> 
<option value=&#39;20&#39;>20</option> 
</select><input type="button" value="开始比较" onclick="getSelectLength();" /></p> 
<p> 
</form> 
</body> 
</html>

Input and output:

for loop execution time: 1
each loop execution time: 3

The two results directly illustrate the problem.

The above is the detailed content of Why does jquery each run slower than js for loop?. For more information, please follow other related articles on the PHP Chinese website!

Statement

The content of this article is voluntarily contributed by netizens, and the copyright belongs to the original author. This site does not assume corresponding legal responsibility. If you find any content suspected of plagiarism or infringement, please contact admin@php.cn

Understanding the JavaScript Engine: Implementation DetailsApr 17, 2025 am 12:05 AM

Understanding how JavaScript engine works internally is important to developers because it helps write more efficient code and understand performance bottlenecks and optimization strategies. 1) The engine's workflow includes three stages: parsing, compiling and execution; 2) During the execution process, the engine will perform dynamic optimization, such as inline cache and hidden classes; 3) Best practices include avoiding global variables, optimizing loops, using const and lets, and avoiding excessive use of closures.

Python vs. JavaScript: The Learning Curve and Ease of UseApr 16, 2025 am 12:12 AM

Python is more suitable for beginners, with a smooth learning curve and concise syntax; JavaScript is suitable for front-end development, with a steep learning curve and flexible syntax. 1. Python syntax is intuitive and suitable for data science and back-end development. 2. JavaScript is flexible and widely used in front-end and server-side programming.

Python vs. JavaScript: Community, Libraries, and ResourcesApr 15, 2025 am 12:16 AM

Python and JavaScript have their own advantages and disadvantages in terms of community, libraries and resources. 1) The Python community is friendly and suitable for beginners, but the front-end development resources are not as rich as JavaScript. 2) Python is powerful in data science and machine learning libraries, while JavaScript is better in front-end development libraries and frameworks. 3) Both have rich learning resources, but Python is suitable for starting with official documents, while JavaScript is better with MDNWebDocs. The choice should be based on project needs and personal interests.

From C/C to JavaScript: How It All WorksApr 14, 2025 am 12:05 AM

The shift from C/C to JavaScript requires adapting to dynamic typing, garbage collection and asynchronous programming. 1) C/C is a statically typed language that requires manual memory management, while JavaScript is dynamically typed and garbage collection is automatically processed. 2) C/C needs to be compiled into machine code, while JavaScript is an interpreted language. 3) JavaScript introduces concepts such as closures, prototype chains and Promise, which enhances flexibility and asynchronous programming capabilities.

JavaScript Engines: Comparing ImplementationsApr 13, 2025 am 12:05 AM

Different JavaScript engines have different effects when parsing and executing JavaScript code, because the implementation principles and optimization strategies of each engine differ. 1. Lexical analysis: convert source code into lexical unit. 2. Grammar analysis: Generate an abstract syntax tree. 3. Optimization and compilation: Generate machine code through the JIT compiler. 4. Execute: Run the machine code. V8 engine optimizes through instant compilation and hidden class, SpiderMonkey uses a type inference system, resulting in different performance performance on the same code.

Beyond the Browser: JavaScript in the Real WorldApr 12, 2025 am 12:06 AM

JavaScript's applications in the real world include server-side programming, mobile application development and Internet of Things control: 1. Server-side programming is realized through Node.js, suitable for high concurrent request processing. 2. Mobile application development is carried out through ReactNative and supports cross-platform deployment. 3. Used for IoT device control through Johnny-Five library, suitable for hardware interaction.

Building a Multi-Tenant SaaS Application with Next.js (Backend Integration)Apr 11, 2025 am 08:23 AM

I built a functional multi-tenant SaaS application (an EdTech app) with your everyday tech tool and you can do the same. First, what’s a multi-tenant SaaS application? Multi-tenant SaaS applications let you serve multiple customers from a sing

How to Build a Multi-Tenant SaaS Application with Next.js (Frontend Integration)Apr 11, 2025 am 08:22 AM

This article demonstrates frontend integration with a backend secured by Permit, building a functional EdTech SaaS application using Next.js. The frontend fetches user permissions to control UI visibility and ensures API requests adhere to role-base

See all articles