


Share the solution to the conflict between jquery focusout and click events
When searching on mainstream search engines, smart prompts will often pop up when you enter content. The input box is input, and the smart prompt area is suggestion. There are generally two operations next:
1. Select a prompt, copy the content into the input, and automatically close the suggestion;
2. Click elsewhere on the web page to automatically close the suggestion.
To realize the first one, you can use click event, add the mouse click event in the suggestion, write the clicked content to the input during processing, and then close the suggestion. There is no problem when tested alone;
To implement the second one, you can add a focusout event or a blur event on the input element, and close the suggestion when the input loses focus. No problem when tested alone.
But when put together, there will be problems. It only responds to the lost focus event (the suggestion is closed), but does not respond to the content click event (the clicked suggestion content is not obtained).
I don’t understand why there is a conflict. I searched online and found some similar problems. Some people suggested using blur, but blur is the same as focusout and neither works.
After thinking about it, I suddenly thought of the triggering conditions of the click event. When you click a button, a click event is triggered, and a click includes: click the mouse and release the mouse. The click event of jquery is triggered after the mouse is released (in fact, the click events of button elements and href elements are like this), so you can understand the conflict problem that just occurred. You click For a certain prompt in suggest, the input loses focus event is triggered at this time, closing the suggest area, and then your mouse is released (the computer response speed is faster than the mouse click and release speed), and the click is completed, but at this time the mouse It is no longer on the prompt to select the suggestion, so the click event in the suggestion cannot be triggered.
After I figured this out, the problem was solved. I changed the response in the suggestion to mousedown, so that it will be triggered when the mouse is clicked. I tested it and it was successful. Now, both the mousedown event and the focusout event have been handled correctly.
//input的丢失焦点事件 $("#input_area").focusout(function(){ $("#suggest_div").hide(); }); //suggest区域的点击事件 $("#suggest_div li").mousedown(function(){ $("#input_area").val($(this).text()); $("#suggest_div").hide(); });
Replacing click with mousedown is completely ok. It’s so simple that I’m embarrassed to say it, but sometimes it’s not easy to think of it!
In addition, I also found other methods on the Internet. One is
$("#input_area").keypress(function() { $("#suggest_div").slideDown(); }).blur(function() { $("#suggest_div").slideUp(); });
This method uses hidden animation to cause delays, making the suggest The click event of the area can be triggered. However, slide is not suitable for all situations, and it is not appropriate to base the success of the function on the speed of animation hiding.
Another method is to wrap the input and suggestion in a div, and add the event directly to the div. This has not been tested, but in theory it should be possible.
The above is the detailed content of Share the solution to the conflict between jquery focusout and click events. For more information, please follow other related articles on the PHP Chinese website!

JavaScript core data types are consistent in browsers and Node.js, but are handled differently from the extra types. 1) The global object is window in the browser and global in Node.js. 2) Node.js' unique Buffer object, used to process binary data. 3) There are also differences in performance and time processing, and the code needs to be adjusted according to the environment.

JavaScriptusestwotypesofcomments:single-line(//)andmulti-line(//).1)Use//forquicknotesorsingle-lineexplanations.2)Use//forlongerexplanationsorcommentingoutblocksofcode.Commentsshouldexplainthe'why',notthe'what',andbeplacedabovetherelevantcodeforclari

The main difference between Python and JavaScript is the type system and application scenarios. 1. Python uses dynamic types, suitable for scientific computing and data analysis. 2. JavaScript adopts weak types and is widely used in front-end and full-stack development. The two have their own advantages in asynchronous programming and performance optimization, and should be decided according to project requirements when choosing.

Whether to choose Python or JavaScript depends on the project type: 1) Choose Python for data science and automation tasks; 2) Choose JavaScript for front-end and full-stack development. Python is favored for its powerful library in data processing and automation, while JavaScript is indispensable for its advantages in web interaction and full-stack development.

Python and JavaScript each have their own advantages, and the choice depends on project needs and personal preferences. 1. Python is easy to learn, with concise syntax, suitable for data science and back-end development, but has a slow execution speed. 2. JavaScript is everywhere in front-end development and has strong asynchronous programming capabilities. Node.js makes it suitable for full-stack development, but the syntax may be complex and error-prone.

JavaScriptisnotbuiltonCorC ;it'saninterpretedlanguagethatrunsonenginesoftenwritteninC .1)JavaScriptwasdesignedasalightweight,interpretedlanguageforwebbrowsers.2)EnginesevolvedfromsimpleinterpreterstoJITcompilers,typicallyinC ,improvingperformance.

JavaScript can be used for front-end and back-end development. The front-end enhances the user experience through DOM operations, and the back-end handles server tasks through Node.js. 1. Front-end example: Change the content of the web page text. 2. Backend example: Create a Node.js server.

Choosing Python or JavaScript should be based on career development, learning curve and ecosystem: 1) Career development: Python is suitable for data science and back-end development, while JavaScript is suitable for front-end and full-stack development. 2) Learning curve: Python syntax is concise and suitable for beginners; JavaScript syntax is flexible. 3) Ecosystem: Python has rich scientific computing libraries, and JavaScript has a powerful front-end framework.


Hot AI Tools

Undresser.AI Undress
AI-powered app for creating realistic nude photos

AI Clothes Remover
Online AI tool for removing clothes from photos.

Undress AI Tool
Undress images for free

Clothoff.io
AI clothes remover

Video Face Swap
Swap faces in any video effortlessly with our completely free AI face swap tool!

Hot Article

Hot Tools

SAP NetWeaver Server Adapter for Eclipse
Integrate Eclipse with SAP NetWeaver application server.

MinGW - Minimalist GNU for Windows
This project is in the process of being migrated to osdn.net/projects/mingw, you can continue to follow us there. MinGW: A native Windows port of the GNU Compiler Collection (GCC), freely distributable import libraries and header files for building native Windows applications; includes extensions to the MSVC runtime to support C99 functionality. All MinGW software can run on 64-bit Windows platforms.

Zend Studio 13.0.1
Powerful PHP integrated development environment

ZendStudio 13.5.1 Mac
Powerful PHP integrated development environment

mPDF
mPDF is a PHP library that can generate PDF files from UTF-8 encoded HTML. The original author, Ian Back, wrote mPDF to output PDF files "on the fly" from his website and handle different languages. It is slower than original scripts like HTML2FPDF and produces larger files when using Unicode fonts, but supports CSS styles etc. and has a lot of enhancements. Supports almost all languages, including RTL (Arabic and Hebrew) and CJK (Chinese, Japanese and Korean). Supports nested block-level elements (such as P, DIV),
