


Analysis of the differences between .bind(), .live() and .delegate() in jQuery
Analysis of the differences between .bind(), .live() and .delegate() in
jQuery, friends who are learning jquery can refer to it.
DOM tree
First, it is helpful to visualize the DOM tree of an HMTL document. A simple HTML page looks like this:
EventBubbling (also known as event propagation)
When we click a link, it triggers the click event of the link element, which triggers the execution of any function we have bound to the click event of the element.
The code is as follows:
$('a').bind('click',function(){alert('that tickles!')})
So a click operation will trigger the execution of the alert function.
The click event will then propagate towards the root of the tree, broadcast to the parent element, and then to each ancestor element, as long as it is a single click on one of its descendant elements. When the click event is triggered, the event will be passed to it.
In the context of manipulating the DOM, document is the root node.
Now we can more easily explain the differences between .bind(), .live() and .delegate().
.bind()
The code is as follows:
$('a').bind('click',function(){alert('That tickles!') ;})
This is the simplest binding method. JQuery scans the document to find all $('a') elements and binds the alert function to the click event of each element.
.live()
The code is as follows:
$('a').live('click',function(){alert('That tickles!') })
JQuery binds the alert function to the $(document) element and uses 'click' and 'a' as parameters. Whenever an event bubbles up to the document node, it checks whether the event is a click event and whether the target element of the event matches the CSS selector of 'a'. If both If so, execute the function.
The live method can also be bound to a specific element (or "context") instead of the document, like this:
The code is as follows:
$('a ',$('#container')[0]).live('click',function(){alert('That tickles!')})
.delegate()
The code is as follows:
$('#container').delegate('a','click',function(){alert('That tickles!')})
JQuery scans the document to find $('#container'), and uses the click event and the 'a' CSS selector as parameters to bind the alert function to $('#container'). Any time an event bubbles up to $('#container'), it checks to see if the event is a click event and if the target element of the event matches the CSS selector. If the results of both checks are true, it executes the function.
It can be noted that this process is similar to .live(), but it binds the handler to a specific element rather than the document root. Savvy JS'ers might conclude that $('a').live() == $(document).delegate('a') , right? Well, no, not quite .
Why .delegate() is easier to use than .live()
For several reasons, people usually prefer to use jQuery's delegate method instead of the live method. Consider the following example:
The code is as follows:
$('a').live('click', function() { blah() });
or
$(document).delegate('a', 'click', function() { blah() });
The latter is actually faster than the former, because the former has to scan the entire The document finds all $('a') elements and saves them as jQueryobjects. Although the live function only needs to pass 'a' as a string parameter for later judgment, the $() function does not "know" that the linked method will be .live().
On the other hand, the delegate method only needs to find and store the $(document) element.
One way to seek to avoid this problem is to call the live bound outside $(document).ready(), so that it will execute immediately. In this way, it runs before the DOM is populated, so no elements are found or jQuery objects are created.
Flexibility and chain capabilities
The live function is also quite puzzling. Think about it, it's linked to the set of $('a') objects, but it actually works on the $(document) object. For this reason, it can try to chain methods onto itself in a scary way. In fact, what I'm saying is that the live method makes more sense as a global jQuery method in the form of $.live('a',...).
Only supports CSS selectors
Last point, the live method has a very big disadvantage, that is, it can only operate on direct CSS selectors. This Making it very inflexible.
To learn more about the shortcomings of CSS selectors, please see the article Exploring jQuery .live() and .die().
Update: Thanks to pedalpete on Hacker News and Ellsass in the comments below for reminding me to add this next section.
Why choose .live() or .delegate() instead of .bind()
After all, bind seems to be more clear and direct, doesn’t it? ?Well, there are two reasons why we prefer delegate or live over bind:
1. To attach handlers to DOM elements that may not yet exist in the DOM. Because bind directly binds handlers to individual elements, it cannot bind handlers to elements that do not yet exist on the page.
2. If you run $('a').bind(...), and then new links are added to the page via AJAX, your bind handler for these newly added links is Invalid. Live and delegate, on the other hand, are bound to another ancestor node, so they are valid for any element that currently or will exist within that ancestor element.
3. Or to attach a handler to a single element or a small group of elements, listen to events on descendant elements instead of looping through and attaching the same function to 100 elements in the DOM one by one superior. There are performance benefits to attaching handlers to one (or a small set of) ancestor elements rather than directly attaching handlers to all elements in the page.
Stop spreading
The last reminder I want to make has to do with event spreading. Normally, we can terminate the execution of the handler function by using such an event method:
The code is as follows:
$('a').bind('click',function(e){ e.preventDefault() e.stopPropagation()} )
However, when we use live or delegate method, the handler function is not actually running, and the function will not run until the event bubbles up to the element that the handler is actually bound to. By this point, our other handler functions from .bind() have already run.
The above is the detailed content of Analysis of the differences between .bind(), .live() and .delegate() in jQuery. For more information, please follow other related articles on the PHP Chinese website!

The main difference between Python and JavaScript is the type system and application scenarios. 1. Python uses dynamic types, suitable for scientific computing and data analysis. 2. JavaScript adopts weak types and is widely used in front-end and full-stack development. The two have their own advantages in asynchronous programming and performance optimization, and should be decided according to project requirements when choosing.

Whether to choose Python or JavaScript depends on the project type: 1) Choose Python for data science and automation tasks; 2) Choose JavaScript for front-end and full-stack development. Python is favored for its powerful library in data processing and automation, while JavaScript is indispensable for its advantages in web interaction and full-stack development.

Python and JavaScript each have their own advantages, and the choice depends on project needs and personal preferences. 1. Python is easy to learn, with concise syntax, suitable for data science and back-end development, but has a slow execution speed. 2. JavaScript is everywhere in front-end development and has strong asynchronous programming capabilities. Node.js makes it suitable for full-stack development, but the syntax may be complex and error-prone.

JavaScriptisnotbuiltonCorC ;it'saninterpretedlanguagethatrunsonenginesoftenwritteninC .1)JavaScriptwasdesignedasalightweight,interpretedlanguageforwebbrowsers.2)EnginesevolvedfromsimpleinterpreterstoJITcompilers,typicallyinC ,improvingperformance.

JavaScript can be used for front-end and back-end development. The front-end enhances the user experience through DOM operations, and the back-end handles server tasks through Node.js. 1. Front-end example: Change the content of the web page text. 2. Backend example: Create a Node.js server.

Choosing Python or JavaScript should be based on career development, learning curve and ecosystem: 1) Career development: Python is suitable for data science and back-end development, while JavaScript is suitable for front-end and full-stack development. 2) Learning curve: Python syntax is concise and suitable for beginners; JavaScript syntax is flexible. 3) Ecosystem: Python has rich scientific computing libraries, and JavaScript has a powerful front-end framework.

The power of the JavaScript framework lies in simplifying development, improving user experience and application performance. When choosing a framework, consider: 1. Project size and complexity, 2. Team experience, 3. Ecosystem and community support.

Introduction I know you may find it strange, what exactly does JavaScript, C and browser have to do? They seem to be unrelated, but in fact, they play a very important role in modern web development. Today we will discuss the close connection between these three. Through this article, you will learn how JavaScript runs in the browser, the role of C in the browser engine, and how they work together to drive rendering and interaction of web pages. We all know the relationship between JavaScript and browser. JavaScript is the core language of front-end development. It runs directly in the browser, making web pages vivid and interesting. Have you ever wondered why JavaScr


Hot AI Tools

Undresser.AI Undress
AI-powered app for creating realistic nude photos

AI Clothes Remover
Online AI tool for removing clothes from photos.

Undress AI Tool
Undress images for free

Clothoff.io
AI clothes remover

Video Face Swap
Swap faces in any video effortlessly with our completely free AI face swap tool!

Hot Article

Hot Tools

DVWA
Damn Vulnerable Web App (DVWA) is a PHP/MySQL web application that is very vulnerable. Its main goals are to be an aid for security professionals to test their skills and tools in a legal environment, to help web developers better understand the process of securing web applications, and to help teachers/students teach/learn in a classroom environment Web application security. The goal of DVWA is to practice some of the most common web vulnerabilities through a simple and straightforward interface, with varying degrees of difficulty. Please note that this software

SublimeText3 English version
Recommended: Win version, supports code prompts!

Atom editor mac version download
The most popular open source editor

Notepad++7.3.1
Easy-to-use and free code editor

Safe Exam Browser
Safe Exam Browser is a secure browser environment for taking online exams securely. This software turns any computer into a secure workstation. It controls access to any utility and prevents students from using unauthorized resources.
