Why write this article?
I have been asked this question before during interviews at Alibaba and other companies, so I want to share it with everyone. If you can clearly understand the difference between the following seven situations, you can follow the interview The officer's clear explanation is undoubtedly a big plus. After understanding this article, the interviewer will no longer be afraid of asking you this.
Talking about this in Javascript, it actually makes people feel headache. Unlike Java, this in C++ points to the object that calls this.
The value of this in a function is determined when the function is actually called and executed, and cannot be determined when the function is defined.
Because the value of this is part of the execution context, every time a function is called, a new execution context will be generated. When you use this in your code, the value of this is obtained directly from the execution context without searching in the scope chain.
Regarding the value of this, it can be roughly divided into the following seven situations:
Case 1: Global & calling ordinary functions
In the global environment, this always points to window.
console.log(this === window); //true
When a normal function is called (note that it is not a constructor, no new is added in front), this also points to the window.
var x = 10; function foo(){ console.log(this); //Window console.log(this.x); //10 } foo();
Case 2: Constructor
The so-called constructor is an object derived from a function new. Generally, the first letter of the function name of the constructor is capitalized, such as Object, Function, and Array. Belongs to the constructor function.
function Foo(){ this.x = 10; console.log(this); //Foo {x:10} } var foo = new Foo(); console.log(foo.x); //10
In the above code, if the function is used as a constructor, then this represents the object it is about to new.
But if you call the Foo function directly instead of new Foo(), it becomes case 1, and Foo() becomes a normal function.
function Foo(){ this.x = 10; console.log(this); //Window } var foo = Foo(); console.log(foo.x); //undefined
Case 3: Object method
If the function is used as a method of the object, this in the method points to the object.
var obj = { x: 10, foo: function () { console.log(this); //Object console.log(this.x); //10 } }; obj.foo();
Note: If the function is defined in the object method, the situation is different.
var obj = { x: 10, foo: function () { function f(){ console.log(this); //Window console.log(this.x); //undefined } f(); } } obj.foo();
It can be understood this way: although function f is defined inside obj.foo, it still belongs to an ordinary function, and this still points to window. (This is a pitfall, please keep it in mind)
Here, if you want to call the variable obj.x in the upper scope, you can use self to cache the external this variable.
var obj = { x: 10, foo: function () { var self = this; function f(){ console.log(self); //{x: 10} console.log(self.x); //10 } f(); } } obj.foo();
If the foo function is not called as an object method:
var obj = { x: 10, foo: function () { console.log(this); //Window console.log(this.x); //undefined } }; var fn = obj.foo; fn();
obj.foo is assigned to a global variable and is not called as a property of obj, then the value of this at this time It's a window.
Case 4: Constructor prototype property
function Foo(){ this.x = 10; } Foo.prototype.getX = function () { console.log(this); //Foo {x: 10, getX: function} console.log(this.x); //10 } var foo = new Foo(); foo.getX();
In the Foo.prototype.getX function, this points to the foo object. Not only that, even in the entire prototype chain, this represents the value of the current object.
Case 5: The function is called using call, apply or bind.
var obj = { x: 10 } function foo(){ console.log(this); //{x: 10} console.log(this.x); //10 } foo.call(obj); foo.apply(obj); foo.bind(obj)();
When a function is called by call, apply or bind, the value of this takes the value of the passed in object.
Case 6: DOM event this
In an HTML DOM event handler, this always points to the HTML DOM node bound to this handler:
function Listener(){ document.getElementById('foo').addEventListener('click', this.handleClick); //这里的 this 指向 Listener 这个对象。不是强调的是这里的 this } Listener.prototype.handleClick = function (event) { console.log(this); //<p id="foo"></p> } var listener = new Listener(); document.getElementById('foo').click();
This is very It's easy to understand. It's equivalent to passing parameters to the function, which changes the handleClick runtime context. It's equivalent to the following code:
var obj = { x: 10, fn: function() { console.log(this); //Window console.log(this.x); //undefined } }; function foo(fn) { fn(); } foo(obj.fn);
You can also use bind to switch context:
function Listener(){ document.getElementById('foo').addEventListener('click',this.handleClick.bind(this)); } Listener.prototype.handleClick = function (event) { console.log(this); //Listener {} } var listener = new Listener(); document.getElementById('foo').click();
before The six situations can be summarized in one sentence: this points to the object that calls the method.
Case 7: this in the arrow function
When using the arrow function, the situation is different: this inside the arrow function is the lexical scope, determined by the context.
var obj = { x: 10, foo: function() { var fn = () => { return () => { return () => { console.log(this); //Object {x: 10} console.log(this.x); //10 } } } fn()()(); } } obj.foo();
Now, the arrow function completely fixes the pointing of this. This always points to the lexical scope, which is the outer caller obj.
If you use arrow functions, the previous hack writing method:
var self = this;
is no longer needed.
var obj = { x: 10, foo: function() { var fn = () => { return () => { return () => { console.log(this); // Object {x: 10} console.log(this.x); //10 } } } fn.bind({x: 14})()()(); fn.call({x: 14})()(); } } obj.foo();
Since this has been bound according to the lexical scope in the arrow function, when calling the arrow function with call() or apply(), this cannot be bound, that is, the first passed in parameters are ignored.
Supplementary Note:
this is a reserved word, you cannot rewrite this.
function test(){ var this = {}; //Uncaught SyntaxError: Unexpected token this }
Host object:
When a language is running, it needs a The environment is called the host environment.
For JavaScript, the most common host environment is a web browser. The browser provides an environment for JavaScript to run. In this environment, some interfaces need to be provided so that the JavaScript engine can interact with Host environment docking.
The JavaScript engine is where JavaScript code is actually executed. Common engines include V8 (currently the fastest JavaScript engine, produced by Google) and JavaScript core.
The browser or server (nodejs) has its own JS engine. In the browser, the global object is window, and in nodejs, the global object is global.
The above is the detailed content of Understanding this in Javascript. For more information, please follow other related articles on the PHP Chinese website!

Python is more suitable for beginners, with a smooth learning curve and concise syntax; JavaScript is suitable for front-end development, with a steep learning curve and flexible syntax. 1. Python syntax is intuitive and suitable for data science and back-end development. 2. JavaScript is flexible and widely used in front-end and server-side programming.

Python and JavaScript have their own advantages and disadvantages in terms of community, libraries and resources. 1) The Python community is friendly and suitable for beginners, but the front-end development resources are not as rich as JavaScript. 2) Python is powerful in data science and machine learning libraries, while JavaScript is better in front-end development libraries and frameworks. 3) Both have rich learning resources, but Python is suitable for starting with official documents, while JavaScript is better with MDNWebDocs. The choice should be based on project needs and personal interests.

The shift from C/C to JavaScript requires adapting to dynamic typing, garbage collection and asynchronous programming. 1) C/C is a statically typed language that requires manual memory management, while JavaScript is dynamically typed and garbage collection is automatically processed. 2) C/C needs to be compiled into machine code, while JavaScript is an interpreted language. 3) JavaScript introduces concepts such as closures, prototype chains and Promise, which enhances flexibility and asynchronous programming capabilities.

Different JavaScript engines have different effects when parsing and executing JavaScript code, because the implementation principles and optimization strategies of each engine differ. 1. Lexical analysis: convert source code into lexical unit. 2. Grammar analysis: Generate an abstract syntax tree. 3. Optimization and compilation: Generate machine code through the JIT compiler. 4. Execute: Run the machine code. V8 engine optimizes through instant compilation and hidden class, SpiderMonkey uses a type inference system, resulting in different performance performance on the same code.

JavaScript's applications in the real world include server-side programming, mobile application development and Internet of Things control: 1. Server-side programming is realized through Node.js, suitable for high concurrent request processing. 2. Mobile application development is carried out through ReactNative and supports cross-platform deployment. 3. Used for IoT device control through Johnny-Five library, suitable for hardware interaction.

I built a functional multi-tenant SaaS application (an EdTech app) with your everyday tech tool and you can do the same. First, what’s a multi-tenant SaaS application? Multi-tenant SaaS applications let you serve multiple customers from a sing

This article demonstrates frontend integration with a backend secured by Permit, building a functional EdTech SaaS application using Next.js. The frontend fetches user permissions to control UI visibility and ensures API requests adhere to role-base

JavaScript is the core language of modern web development and is widely used for its diversity and flexibility. 1) Front-end development: build dynamic web pages and single-page applications through DOM operations and modern frameworks (such as React, Vue.js, Angular). 2) Server-side development: Node.js uses a non-blocking I/O model to handle high concurrency and real-time applications. 3) Mobile and desktop application development: cross-platform development is realized through ReactNative and Electron to improve development efficiency.


Hot AI Tools

Undresser.AI Undress
AI-powered app for creating realistic nude photos

AI Clothes Remover
Online AI tool for removing clothes from photos.

Undress AI Tool
Undress images for free

Clothoff.io
AI clothes remover

AI Hentai Generator
Generate AI Hentai for free.

Hot Article

Hot Tools

SAP NetWeaver Server Adapter for Eclipse
Integrate Eclipse with SAP NetWeaver application server.

Dreamweaver CS6
Visual web development tools

Zend Studio 13.0.1
Powerful PHP integrated development environment

EditPlus Chinese cracked version
Small size, syntax highlighting, does not support code prompt function

MinGW - Minimalist GNU for Windows
This project is in the process of being migrated to osdn.net/projects/mingw, you can continue to follow us there. MinGW: A native Windows port of the GNU Compiler Collection (GCC), freely distributable import libraries and header files for building native Windows applications; includes extensions to the MSVC runtime to support C99 functionality. All MinGW software can run on 64-bit Windows platforms.