JavaScript’s data type is divided into six types, namely null, undefined, boolean, string,number,object. Object is a reference type, the other five types are basic types or primitive types. We can use the typeof method to print out which type something belongs to. When comparing variables of different types, the type must be converted first, which is called type conversion. Type conversion is also called implicit conversion. Implicit conversions usually occur with operatorsaddition, subtraction, multiplication, division, equals, and less than, greater than, etc. .
typeof '11' //string typeof(11) //number '11' < 4 //false
Conversion of basic types
Let’s talk about addition, subtraction, multiplication and division first:
1.StringAdd numbers, numbers will be converted into a string.
2. Subtract strings from numbers and convert strings into numbers. If the string is not a pure number, it will be converted to NaN. The same goes for string minus numbers. Subtracting two strings also converts them into numbers first.
3. The same applies to conversions of multiplication, division, greater than, less than and subtraction.
//隐式转换 + - * == / // + 10 + '20' //2010 // - 10 - '20' //-10 10 - 'one' //NaN 10 - '100a' //NaN // * 10*'20' //200 '10'*'20' //200 // / 20/'10' //2 '20'/'10' //2 '20'/'one' //NaN
Let’s take a look at a group of ==.
1. undefined equals null
2. When comparing strings and numbers, convert strings to numbers
3. When comparing numbers to Boolean, convert Boolean to numbers
4. When comparing strings and Boolean, convert the two to numbers
// == undefined == null; //true '0' == 0; //true,字符串转数字 0 == false; //true,布尔转数字 '0' == false; //true,两者转数字 null == false; //false undefined == false; //false
Conversion of reference types
The comparison between basic types is relatively simple. The comparison between reference types and basic types is relatively complicated. First, the reference type must be converted into a basic type, and then compared according to the above method. Reference types converted to Boolean are all true. For example, an empty array, as long as it is an object, is a reference type, so [] is true. To convert a reference type to a number or a string, use valueOf() or toString(); the object itself inherits valuOf() and toString(), and you can also customize valueOf() and toString(). Depending on the object, use the inherited valueOf() to convert it to a string, a number or itself, and the object must be converted to a string using toString. General objects call valueOf() by default. 1. When converting an object to a number, call valueOf();
2. When converting an object to a string, call toString();
First look at the following example:
0 == []; // true, 0 == [].valueOf(); -> 0 == 0; '0' == []; // false, '0' == [].toString(); -> '0' == ''; 2 == ['2']; // true, 2 == ['2'].valueOf(); -> 2 == '2' -> 2 == 2; '2' == [2]; // true, '2' == [2].toString(); -> '2' =='2'; [] == ![]; //true, [].valueOf() == !Boolean([]) -> 0 == false -> 0 == 0;
When the object is converted into a number, valueOf() is called. Before that, toString() is called; so I guess the valueOf method is like this. So the above example 0 == [] should be changed to the following which is more reasonable. In any case, [] is eventually converted to 0.
var valueOf = function (){ var str = this.toString(); //先调用toString(),转成字符串 //... } 0 == []; // true, 0 == [].valueOf(); -> 0 == '0' -> 0 == 0;
Customized valueOf() and toString();
1. Customized valueOf() and toString() both exist and will be called by default valueOf();
2. If there is only toString(), call toString();
var a = [1]; a.valueOf = function (){ return 1;} a.toString = function (){ return '1';} a + 1; // 2, valueOf()先调用
Removing valueOf() will call toString().
var a = [1]; a.valueOf = function (){ return 1;} a.toString = function (){ return '1';} a + 1; // 2, 先调用valueOf() //去掉valueOf delete a.valueOf; a + 1; // '11', 调用toString()
What happens if something else is returned?
var a = [1]; a.valueOf = function (){return ;} a.toString = function (){return 1 ;}; 1 - a; //NaN
Other objects call valueOf() to convert to different types:
var a = {}; a.valueOf(); //Object {} var a = []; a.valueOf(); //[] 自己本身 var a = new Date(); a.valueOf(); //1423812036234 数字 var a = new RegExp(); a.valueOf(); // /(?:)/ 正则对象
The comparison between reference types is the comparison of memory addresses and does not require implicit conversion. I won’t go into details here.
[] == [] //false 地址不一样 var a = []; b = a; b == a //trueExplicit conversion
Explicit conversion is relatively simple, you can directly use the class as a method to convert directly.
Number([]); //0 String([]); //'' Boolean([]); //true
There is an easier conversion method.
3 + '' // 字符串'3' +'3' // 数字3 !!'3' // true
The above is the detailed content of A brief discussion on implicit type conversion in JavaScript. For more information, please follow other related articles on the PHP Chinese website!

The main difference between Python and JavaScript is the type system and application scenarios. 1. Python uses dynamic types, suitable for scientific computing and data analysis. 2. JavaScript adopts weak types and is widely used in front-end and full-stack development. The two have their own advantages in asynchronous programming and performance optimization, and should be decided according to project requirements when choosing.

Whether to choose Python or JavaScript depends on the project type: 1) Choose Python for data science and automation tasks; 2) Choose JavaScript for front-end and full-stack development. Python is favored for its powerful library in data processing and automation, while JavaScript is indispensable for its advantages in web interaction and full-stack development.

Python and JavaScript each have their own advantages, and the choice depends on project needs and personal preferences. 1. Python is easy to learn, with concise syntax, suitable for data science and back-end development, but has a slow execution speed. 2. JavaScript is everywhere in front-end development and has strong asynchronous programming capabilities. Node.js makes it suitable for full-stack development, but the syntax may be complex and error-prone.

JavaScriptisnotbuiltonCorC ;it'saninterpretedlanguagethatrunsonenginesoftenwritteninC .1)JavaScriptwasdesignedasalightweight,interpretedlanguageforwebbrowsers.2)EnginesevolvedfromsimpleinterpreterstoJITcompilers,typicallyinC ,improvingperformance.

JavaScript can be used for front-end and back-end development. The front-end enhances the user experience through DOM operations, and the back-end handles server tasks through Node.js. 1. Front-end example: Change the content of the web page text. 2. Backend example: Create a Node.js server.

Choosing Python or JavaScript should be based on career development, learning curve and ecosystem: 1) Career development: Python is suitable for data science and back-end development, while JavaScript is suitable for front-end and full-stack development. 2) Learning curve: Python syntax is concise and suitable for beginners; JavaScript syntax is flexible. 3) Ecosystem: Python has rich scientific computing libraries, and JavaScript has a powerful front-end framework.

The power of the JavaScript framework lies in simplifying development, improving user experience and application performance. When choosing a framework, consider: 1. Project size and complexity, 2. Team experience, 3. Ecosystem and community support.

Introduction I know you may find it strange, what exactly does JavaScript, C and browser have to do? They seem to be unrelated, but in fact, they play a very important role in modern web development. Today we will discuss the close connection between these three. Through this article, you will learn how JavaScript runs in the browser, the role of C in the browser engine, and how they work together to drive rendering and interaction of web pages. We all know the relationship between JavaScript and browser. JavaScript is the core language of front-end development. It runs directly in the browser, making web pages vivid and interesting. Have you ever wondered why JavaScr


Hot AI Tools

Undresser.AI Undress
AI-powered app for creating realistic nude photos

AI Clothes Remover
Online AI tool for removing clothes from photos.

Undress AI Tool
Undress images for free

Clothoff.io
AI clothes remover

Video Face Swap
Swap faces in any video effortlessly with our completely free AI face swap tool!

Hot Article

Hot Tools

SecLists
SecLists is the ultimate security tester's companion. It is a collection of various types of lists that are frequently used during security assessments, all in one place. SecLists helps make security testing more efficient and productive by conveniently providing all the lists a security tester might need. List types include usernames, passwords, URLs, fuzzing payloads, sensitive data patterns, web shells, and more. The tester can simply pull this repository onto a new test machine and he will have access to every type of list he needs.

DVWA
Damn Vulnerable Web App (DVWA) is a PHP/MySQL web application that is very vulnerable. Its main goals are to be an aid for security professionals to test their skills and tools in a legal environment, to help web developers better understand the process of securing web applications, and to help teachers/students teach/learn in a classroom environment Web application security. The goal of DVWA is to practice some of the most common web vulnerabilities through a simple and straightforward interface, with varying degrees of difficulty. Please note that this software

SublimeText3 Mac version
God-level code editing software (SublimeText3)

SublimeText3 English version
Recommended: Win version, supports code prompts!

SublimeText3 Linux new version
SublimeText3 Linux latest version
