


In-depth understanding of the difference between typeof and instanceof in JavaScript
This time I mainly talk about the usage and precautions of JavaScript's type judgment function typeof and judgment constructor prototype instanceof.
typeof
Let’s talk about typeof first. The first thing to note is that the typeof method returns a string to represent the type of the data.
Grammar explanation
Let’s first look at the value of typeof corresponding to each data type:
Data type | Type |
---|---|
Undefined | “undefined” |
Null | "object" |
Boolean value | "boolean" |
numeric value | "number " |
string | "string" |
Symbol (new in ECMAScript 6) | " symbol” |
Host object (provided by the JS environment, such as the browser) | Implementation-dependent |
Function object | "function" |
Any other object | "object" |
Look again Specific example:
// Numbers typeof 37 === 'number'; typeof 3.14 === 'number'; typeof Math.LN2 === 'number'; typeof Infinity === 'number'; typeof NaN === 'number'; // 尽管NaN是"Not-A-Number"的缩写,意思是"不是一个数字" typeof Number(1) === 'number'; // 不要这样使用! // Strings typeof "" === 'string'; typeof "bla" === 'string'; typeof (typeof 1) === 'string'; // typeof返回的肯定是一个字符串 typeof String("abc") === 'string'; // 不要这样使用! // Booleans typeof true === 'boolean'; typeof false === 'boolean'; typeof Boolean(true) === 'boolean'; // 不要这样使用! // Symbols typeof Symbol() === 'symbol'; typeof Symbol('foo') === 'symbol'; typeof Symbol.iterator === 'symbol'; // Undefined typeof undefined === 'undefined'; typeof blabla === 'undefined'; // 一个未定义的变量,或者一个定义了却未赋初值的变量 // Objects typeof {a:1} === 'object'; // 使用Array.isArray或者Object.prototype.toString.call方法可以从基本的对象中区分出数组类型 typeof [1, 2, 4] === 'object'; typeof new Date() === 'object'; // 下面的容易令人迷惑,不要这样使用! typeof new Boolean(true) === 'object'; typeof new Number(1) ==== 'object'; typeof new String("abc") === 'object'; // 函数 typeof function(){} === 'function'; typeof Math.sin === 'function';
We will find a problem, that is, typeof is not accurate to determine the data type. For example, the typeof return value of arrays, regular expressions, dates, and objects is all object, which will cause some errors.
So on the basis of typeof judging the type, we also need to use the Object.prototype.toString method to further judge the data type.
Let’s take a look at the difference between the return values of the toString method and the typeof method in the case of the same data type:
Data | toString | typeof |
---|---|---|
"foo" | String | string |
new String(“foo”) | String | object |
Number | object | |
Boolean | boolean | |
Boolean | object | |
Date | object | |
Error | object | |
Array | object | ##/abc/g |
object | new RegExp(“meow”) | |
object |
The above is the detailed content of In-depth understanding of the difference between typeof and instanceof in JavaScript. For more information, please follow other related articles on the PHP Chinese website!

JavaScriptusestwotypesofcomments:single-line(//)andmulti-line(//).1)Use//forquicknotesorsingle-lineexplanations.2)Use//forlongerexplanationsorcommentingoutblocksofcode.Commentsshouldexplainthe'why',notthe'what',andbeplacedabovetherelevantcodeforclari

The main difference between Python and JavaScript is the type system and application scenarios. 1. Python uses dynamic types, suitable for scientific computing and data analysis. 2. JavaScript adopts weak types and is widely used in front-end and full-stack development. The two have their own advantages in asynchronous programming and performance optimization, and should be decided according to project requirements when choosing.

Whether to choose Python or JavaScript depends on the project type: 1) Choose Python for data science and automation tasks; 2) Choose JavaScript for front-end and full-stack development. Python is favored for its powerful library in data processing and automation, while JavaScript is indispensable for its advantages in web interaction and full-stack development.

Python and JavaScript each have their own advantages, and the choice depends on project needs and personal preferences. 1. Python is easy to learn, with concise syntax, suitable for data science and back-end development, but has a slow execution speed. 2. JavaScript is everywhere in front-end development and has strong asynchronous programming capabilities. Node.js makes it suitable for full-stack development, but the syntax may be complex and error-prone.

JavaScriptisnotbuiltonCorC ;it'saninterpretedlanguagethatrunsonenginesoftenwritteninC .1)JavaScriptwasdesignedasalightweight,interpretedlanguageforwebbrowsers.2)EnginesevolvedfromsimpleinterpreterstoJITcompilers,typicallyinC ,improvingperformance.

JavaScript can be used for front-end and back-end development. The front-end enhances the user experience through DOM operations, and the back-end handles server tasks through Node.js. 1. Front-end example: Change the content of the web page text. 2. Backend example: Create a Node.js server.

Choosing Python or JavaScript should be based on career development, learning curve and ecosystem: 1) Career development: Python is suitable for data science and back-end development, while JavaScript is suitable for front-end and full-stack development. 2) Learning curve: Python syntax is concise and suitable for beginners; JavaScript syntax is flexible. 3) Ecosystem: Python has rich scientific computing libraries, and JavaScript has a powerful front-end framework.

The power of the JavaScript framework lies in simplifying development, improving user experience and application performance. When choosing a framework, consider: 1. Project size and complexity, 2. Team experience, 3. Ecosystem and community support.


Hot AI Tools

Undresser.AI Undress
AI-powered app for creating realistic nude photos

AI Clothes Remover
Online AI tool for removing clothes from photos.

Undress AI Tool
Undress images for free

Clothoff.io
AI clothes remover

Video Face Swap
Swap faces in any video effortlessly with our completely free AI face swap tool!

Hot Article

Hot Tools

PhpStorm Mac version
The latest (2018.2.1) professional PHP integrated development tool

DVWA
Damn Vulnerable Web App (DVWA) is a PHP/MySQL web application that is very vulnerable. Its main goals are to be an aid for security professionals to test their skills and tools in a legal environment, to help web developers better understand the process of securing web applications, and to help teachers/students teach/learn in a classroom environment Web application security. The goal of DVWA is to practice some of the most common web vulnerabilities through a simple and straightforward interface, with varying degrees of difficulty. Please note that this software

SublimeText3 Chinese version
Chinese version, very easy to use

SecLists
SecLists is the ultimate security tester's companion. It is a collection of various types of lists that are frequently used during security assessments, all in one place. SecLists helps make security testing more efficient and productive by conveniently providing all the lists a security tester might need. List types include usernames, passwords, URLs, fuzzing payloads, sensitive data patterns, web shells, and more. The tester can simply pull this repository onto a new test machine and he will have access to every type of list he needs.

Dreamweaver Mac version
Visual web development tools
