Well, I just wrote a lot, but it was overwritten by my mistake. My hard work╥﹏╥…
It’s okay to write it again. I also remind you to blog on this platform and be like me. For students who also like to use markdown language to code words
"Save online to draft" is a good habit, hmm
Today is Double Eleven, I feel like it’s time to buy something. .
When many students learn JavaScript, they may hear about "various" scopes
What are lexical scope, static scope, dynamic scope, function scope, Block scope
I can’t tell the difference
Let me clarify my thoughts for everyone
Scope mode
The scope’s working mode is divided into two types, static function Domain and dynamic scope
Static scope includes function scope and block scope
Students may ask what about lexical scope
In fact, lexical scope and static scope are the same thing
The picture is not good, everyone understands what I mean
Now that we have clarified this point, let’s go into detail
There is one more question to add, That is, is there dynamic scope in JavaScript?
Regarding this, I got completely opposite answers in the two books I have read
Whether it is the with statement or the catch clause of the try-catch statement, or it contains The eval() functions are all considered dynamic scopes. Dynamic scope only exists during code execution and therefore cannot be detected by static analysis (looking at the code structure). ——"High-Performance JavaScript" /p24
What needs to be clear is that in fact JavaScript does not have dynamic scope. It has only lexical scope, plain and simple. But this mechanism is somewhat like dynamic scope. ——"JavaScript You Don't Know (Volume 1)" /p59
These two books are very new, and both are very authoritative books, highly recommended
especially "JavaScript You Don't Know" series, when the middle volume just came out last month, I couldn't wait to buy a copy from the Internet
I was not disappointed
Ahem, I digressed, back to the topic
I think the great authors of the original book have different understandings of dynamic scope
That’s why this seemingly contradictory point of view
Here I want to talk about my position
Through my understanding, I also think There is no dynamic scope in JavaScript
What is the difference between static and dynamic scope
Look down↓
Lexical scope and dynamic scope
Let me start with a piece of code
function foo(){ var a = 1; bar(); }function bar(){ console.log(a); }var a = 100; foo();
Through our in-depth understanding of precompilation and scope
In the lexical scope of our JavaScript, the final result prints 100
But if we If the scope is a dynamic scope, the printed value will become 1
Why is this?
The most important feature of lexical scope is that its definition process occurs during the writing phase (if eval() and with are not used)
Dynamic scope enables the scope to be dynamically determined at runtime
Lexical scope cares about where the function is declared, and the scope chain is based on scope nesting
Dynamic scope cares about where the function is called, and the scope chain is based on the call stack
I translated the above words to The code is
Lexical scope: Because the bar function is declared globally, I output the value of the global variable a
Dynamic scope: Because the bar function is called within the foo function, so I output foo The value of variable a in
This is my understanding
The programming languages I have come into contact with are limited, all of which are lexical scopes. I have never seen a language based on dynamic scopes
C, C++, C#, Java, JavaScript, and php are all lexical scopes
JavaScript and php are based on function scope, and others are based on block scope
Function scope and block scope
In my understanding
The function scope is the scope generated by the function code block, and the block scope is the scope generated by the curly bracket code block
I have seen this written in many blogs. In JavaScript, there is only Function scope (big mistake)
This is completely incorrect, there is no dispute
JavaScript is indeed based on function scope, but it does not mean that we do not have block scope
There are many special cases, There are the with keyword, the catch clause of the try-catch statement, the let keyword (ES6), and the const keyword (ES6)
Here I will just briefly talk about it
Both the keyword with and the catch clause can be generated Block scope
I should have written about this in detail in an article
If you are interested, you can check it out
Portal->JavaScript deceptive lexical eval, with and catch and its performance issues
The let keyword is very similar to var. They both declare variables. However, the let keyword can bind the variable to any scope.
And using let to declare will not be promoted in the block scope.
The const keyword also declares variables, but it declares constants and binds variables to the block scope.
This is almost the same as our const keyword in C/C++
More about me I’ll talk about it in detail later when I write about ES6 knowledge
Now we only need to know “There is a block scope in JavaScript”
Summary
As usual, let me summarize for you
Scope working mode: Lexical/static scope, dynamic scope
Lexical scope : Function scope, block scope
JavaScript does not have dynamic scope
JavaScript has block scope
with, catch clause, let (ES6), const (ES6) generate block scope
Lexical scope cares where the function is declared
Dynamic scope cares about where the function is called
Lexical scope scope chaining is based on scope nesting
Dynamic scope scope chain is based on the call stack
The above is to clarify the content of lexical, static, dynamic, function, and block scope in JS. For more related content, please pay attention to PHP Chinese Net (www.php.cn)!

The main difference between Python and JavaScript is the type system and application scenarios. 1. Python uses dynamic types, suitable for scientific computing and data analysis. 2. JavaScript adopts weak types and is widely used in front-end and full-stack development. The two have their own advantages in asynchronous programming and performance optimization, and should be decided according to project requirements when choosing.

Whether to choose Python or JavaScript depends on the project type: 1) Choose Python for data science and automation tasks; 2) Choose JavaScript for front-end and full-stack development. Python is favored for its powerful library in data processing and automation, while JavaScript is indispensable for its advantages in web interaction and full-stack development.

Python and JavaScript each have their own advantages, and the choice depends on project needs and personal preferences. 1. Python is easy to learn, with concise syntax, suitable for data science and back-end development, but has a slow execution speed. 2. JavaScript is everywhere in front-end development and has strong asynchronous programming capabilities. Node.js makes it suitable for full-stack development, but the syntax may be complex and error-prone.

JavaScriptisnotbuiltonCorC ;it'saninterpretedlanguagethatrunsonenginesoftenwritteninC .1)JavaScriptwasdesignedasalightweight,interpretedlanguageforwebbrowsers.2)EnginesevolvedfromsimpleinterpreterstoJITcompilers,typicallyinC ,improvingperformance.

JavaScript can be used for front-end and back-end development. The front-end enhances the user experience through DOM operations, and the back-end handles server tasks through Node.js. 1. Front-end example: Change the content of the web page text. 2. Backend example: Create a Node.js server.

Choosing Python or JavaScript should be based on career development, learning curve and ecosystem: 1) Career development: Python is suitable for data science and back-end development, while JavaScript is suitable for front-end and full-stack development. 2) Learning curve: Python syntax is concise and suitable for beginners; JavaScript syntax is flexible. 3) Ecosystem: Python has rich scientific computing libraries, and JavaScript has a powerful front-end framework.

The power of the JavaScript framework lies in simplifying development, improving user experience and application performance. When choosing a framework, consider: 1. Project size and complexity, 2. Team experience, 3. Ecosystem and community support.

Introduction I know you may find it strange, what exactly does JavaScript, C and browser have to do? They seem to be unrelated, but in fact, they play a very important role in modern web development. Today we will discuss the close connection between these three. Through this article, you will learn how JavaScript runs in the browser, the role of C in the browser engine, and how they work together to drive rendering and interaction of web pages. We all know the relationship between JavaScript and browser. JavaScript is the core language of front-end development. It runs directly in the browser, making web pages vivid and interesting. Have you ever wondered why JavaScr


Hot AI Tools

Undresser.AI Undress
AI-powered app for creating realistic nude photos

AI Clothes Remover
Online AI tool for removing clothes from photos.

Undress AI Tool
Undress images for free

Clothoff.io
AI clothes remover

Video Face Swap
Swap faces in any video effortlessly with our completely free AI face swap tool!

Hot Article

Hot Tools

Atom editor mac version download
The most popular open source editor

SublimeText3 Linux new version
SublimeText3 Linux latest version

mPDF
mPDF is a PHP library that can generate PDF files from UTF-8 encoded HTML. The original author, Ian Back, wrote mPDF to output PDF files "on the fly" from his website and handle different languages. It is slower than original scripts like HTML2FPDF and produces larger files when using Unicode fonts, but supports CSS styles etc. and has a lot of enhancements. Supports almost all languages, including RTL (Arabic and Hebrew) and CJK (Chinese, Japanese and Korean). Supports nested block-level elements (such as P, DIV),

MinGW - Minimalist GNU for Windows
This project is in the process of being migrated to osdn.net/projects/mingw, you can continue to follow us there. MinGW: A native Windows port of the GNU Compiler Collection (GCC), freely distributable import libraries and header files for building native Windows applications; includes extensions to the MSVC runtime to support C99 functionality. All MinGW software can run on 64-bit Windows platforms.

SublimeText3 English version
Recommended: Win version, supports code prompts!
