


When we make lists, we often encounter the problem of selecting all and inverting the selection for batch processing, for example:
I simply implemented it at the time, and then wanted to encapsulate it In the public js, the encapsulation is so bad that I am embarrassed to post it (that is, put the implementation code into the public js, and then use fixed id and class for each page. Now that I think about it, I am embarrassed to call him Encapsulated), and then I thought that the boss had written this function before. Let’s see how he wrote it. There is really no harm without comparison. This is called encapsulation;
$(':checkbox[data-check-target]').click(function () { var target = $(this).attr('data-check-target'); if ($(this).prop('checked')) { $(target).prop('checked', true); } else { $(target).prop('checked', false); } });
First of all, the high encapsulation here is reflected. , there is only one custom data-check-target attribute used for the connection bridge after the separation of js and html (and I used two at the time: a select all check box, a sub-check box, and all relevant points were used , this will not have the effect of encapsulation, and the coupling between js and html is too large) (when I saw the js above, I was thinking about how to connect three related things through a connection point);
Next we continue to look at the specific uses:
I found that the select all check box is used for the custom attribute data-check- of the bridge linked to js The target is a bit special:
<input type="checkbox" data-check-target=".id-checkbox" />
Its value is ".id-checkbox", which looks strange. Continue to look down at the sub-checkbox implementation:
<input type="checkbox" name="ids[]" value="@item.Id" class="id-checkbox" />
It suddenly dawned on me that the class name of the sub-checkbox is stored in the custom attribute data-check-target;
var target = $(this).attr('data-check-target');
Then pass The custom attribute data-check-target gets the class of the sub-check box, thereby achieving high encapsulation;
What I summarized is that js and html passed the custom attribute data-check-target communication, and the sub-check box The check box depends on the value of the custom attribute data-check-target of the select all check box;
This example is not difficult to code, and there is nothing difficult to understand. It is cleverly done through a custom attribute. The low-coupling encapsulation is completed, which is the difficulty and essence of this code;
I really can't restrain my inner admiration, these lines of code are so beautiful.
PS: Why does the above js use prop instead of attr? Because: if the checked attribute is not defined during initialization in the current input, then the element does not have a specified checked attribute, so .attr() will return undefined;
For the inherent attributes of the HTML element itself, use the prop method when processing.
For our own custom DOM attributes of HTML elements, use the attr method when processing them.
The above is the JQuery implementation introduced by the editor to you to encapsulate the checkbox selection and inverse selection function in the list (recommended). I hope it will be helpful to you. If you have any questions, please leave me a message. Xiao The editor will reply to everyone promptly. I would also like to thank you all for your support of the PHP Chinese website!
For more JQuery implementation of the check box in the list, select all and invert the selection function encapsulation related articles, please pay attention to the PHP Chinese website!

Python and JavaScript each have their own advantages, and the choice depends on project needs and personal preferences. 1. Python is easy to learn, with concise syntax, suitable for data science and back-end development, but has a slow execution speed. 2. JavaScript is everywhere in front-end development and has strong asynchronous programming capabilities. Node.js makes it suitable for full-stack development, but the syntax may be complex and error-prone.

JavaScriptisnotbuiltonCorC ;it'saninterpretedlanguagethatrunsonenginesoftenwritteninC .1)JavaScriptwasdesignedasalightweight,interpretedlanguageforwebbrowsers.2)EnginesevolvedfromsimpleinterpreterstoJITcompilers,typicallyinC ,improvingperformance.

JavaScript can be used for front-end and back-end development. The front-end enhances the user experience through DOM operations, and the back-end handles server tasks through Node.js. 1. Front-end example: Change the content of the web page text. 2. Backend example: Create a Node.js server.

Choosing Python or JavaScript should be based on career development, learning curve and ecosystem: 1) Career development: Python is suitable for data science and back-end development, while JavaScript is suitable for front-end and full-stack development. 2) Learning curve: Python syntax is concise and suitable for beginners; JavaScript syntax is flexible. 3) Ecosystem: Python has rich scientific computing libraries, and JavaScript has a powerful front-end framework.

The power of the JavaScript framework lies in simplifying development, improving user experience and application performance. When choosing a framework, consider: 1. Project size and complexity, 2. Team experience, 3. Ecosystem and community support.

Introduction I know you may find it strange, what exactly does JavaScript, C and browser have to do? They seem to be unrelated, but in fact, they play a very important role in modern web development. Today we will discuss the close connection between these three. Through this article, you will learn how JavaScript runs in the browser, the role of C in the browser engine, and how they work together to drive rendering and interaction of web pages. We all know the relationship between JavaScript and browser. JavaScript is the core language of front-end development. It runs directly in the browser, making web pages vivid and interesting. Have you ever wondered why JavaScr

Node.js excels at efficient I/O, largely thanks to streams. Streams process data incrementally, avoiding memory overload—ideal for large files, network tasks, and real-time applications. Combining streams with TypeScript's type safety creates a powe

The differences in performance and efficiency between Python and JavaScript are mainly reflected in: 1) As an interpreted language, Python runs slowly but has high development efficiency and is suitable for rapid prototype development; 2) JavaScript is limited to single thread in the browser, but multi-threading and asynchronous I/O can be used to improve performance in Node.js, and both have advantages in actual projects.


Hot AI Tools

Undresser.AI Undress
AI-powered app for creating realistic nude photos

AI Clothes Remover
Online AI tool for removing clothes from photos.

Undress AI Tool
Undress images for free

Clothoff.io
AI clothes remover

Video Face Swap
Swap faces in any video effortlessly with our completely free AI face swap tool!

Hot Article

Hot Tools

Notepad++7.3.1
Easy-to-use and free code editor

MantisBT
Mantis is an easy-to-deploy web-based defect tracking tool designed to aid in product defect tracking. It requires PHP, MySQL and a web server. Check out our demo and hosting services.

WebStorm Mac version
Useful JavaScript development tools

PhpStorm Mac version
The latest (2018.2.1) professional PHP integrated development tool

SecLists
SecLists is the ultimate security tester's companion. It is a collection of various types of lists that are frequently used during security assessments, all in one place. SecLists helps make security testing more efficient and productive by conveniently providing all the lists a security tester might need. List types include usernames, passwords, URLs, fuzzing payloads, sensitive data patterns, web shells, and more. The tester can simply pull this repository onto a new test machine and he will have access to every type of list he needs.
