The examples in this article describe Java's use of ArrayList traversal and efficiency comparison. Share it with everyone for your reference. The details are as follows:
ArrayList arrL = new ArrayList(); ArrayList arrLTmp1 = new ArrayList(); ArrayList arrLTmp2 = new ArrayList(); ArrayList arrLTmp3 = new ArrayList(); ArrayList arrLTmp4 = new ArrayList(); for (int i=0;i<1000000;i++){ arrL.add("第"+i+"个"); } long t1 = System.nanoTime(); //方法1 Iterator it = arrL.iterator(); while(it.hasNext()){ arrLTmp1.add(it.next()); } long t2 = System.nanoTime(); //方法2 for(Iterator it2 = arrL.iterator();it2.hasNext();){ arrLTmp2.add(it2.next()); } long t3 = System.nanoTime(); //方法3 for (String vv :arrL){ arrLTmp3.add(vv); } long t4 = System.nanoTime(); //方法4 for(int i=0;i arrLTmp4.add(arrL.get(i)); } long t5 = System.nanoTime(); System.out.println("第一种方法耗时:" + (t2-t1)/1000 + "微秒"); System.out.println("第二种方法耗时:" + (t3-t2)/1000 + "微秒"); System.out.println("第三种方法耗时:" + (t4-t3)/1000 + "微秒"); System.out.println("第四种方法耗时:" + (t5-t4)/1000 + "微秒");
Output result:
第一种方法耗时:143069微秒 第二种方法耗时:381666微秒 第三种方法耗时:125909微秒 第四种方法耗时:63693微秒
Change the above 1000000 to 10 , the output result is:
第一种方法耗时:307微秒 第二种方法耗时:14微秒 第三种方法耗时:14微秒 第四种方法耗时:14微秒
I hope this article will be helpful to everyone’s java programming.
For more java using ArrayList traversal and efficiency comparison example analysis and related articles, please pay attention to the PHP Chinese website!