


Detailed explanation of jQuery event binding on(), bind() and delegate() methods
I have been studying js for a while. In the process of learning, I found that when binding events in jQuery, some people use bind(), some use on(), some use delegate(), and some use live(). When I looked at the code, I felt that the functions had been implemented, so I passed it by. I just didn't fully understand the difference, so I checked the information today and made a summary myself.
The reason why there are so many types of binding methods is because the version of jQuery is updated. For example, the on() method appeared after 1.7.
On the jQuery event binding api page, it is mentioned that the live() method is obsolete and is not recommended for use. So here we mainly look at the following three methods: bind(), delegate(), on()
We prepare an html page for testing various types of event binding.
<html> <head> <meta charset="UTF-8"> <title></title> <script src="http://libs.baidu.com/jquery/1.10.2/jquery.min.js"></script> </head> <body> <div> <button id="btn">添加新的p元素</button> <p>第一个p元素</p> <p>第二个p元素</p> <p>第三个p元素</p> <p>第四个p元素</p> <p>第五个p元素</p> </div> <script> $("#btn").click(function(){ $("div").append("<p>这是一个新的p元素</p>"); }); </script> </body> </html>
A simple page with a div, several p elements and a button inside the div. Click the button to add p elements. Next we will bind the click event to the p element on the page.
bind()
Usage
$("div p").bind("click", function () { alert($(this).text()); })
In this way, the click event is bound to all p elements in the div, and the response is to pop up its content. Binding is very simple and fast, but there are two problems here:
The first problem is that the implicit iteration method is used here. If there are too many matched elements, for example, if I put 50 in a div p element, you have to perform binding 50 times. For a large number of elements, performance is affected.
But if it is an id selector, because the id is unique, it is very fast to use the bind() method.
The second problem is that elements that do not yet exist cannot be bound. Clicking the button on the page will dynamically add a p element. If you click on this p element, you will find that there is no action response.
Using the delegate method can solve these two problems.
In addition, there is an abbreviation for the bind() method. The above code can also be replaced with:
$("div p").click(function () { alert($(this).text()); })
delegate()
Usage
$("div").delegate("p", "click", function () { alert($(this).text()); });
This method uses the concept of event delegation. Instead of binding events directly to the p element, bind events to its parent element (or ancestor elements as well). When you click on any element within the div, the event will bubble up from the event target layer by layer until it reaches The element to which you bind the event, such as the div element in this example. During the bubbling process, if the event's currentTarget matches the selector, the code will be executed.
This solves the above two problems of using the bind() method. There is no need to bind events to p elements one by one, and you can also bind dynamically added p elements. Even if you bind an event to a document, you don't have to wait for the document to be ready to perform the binding.
In this way, binding is easy, but problems may also occur when calling. If the event target is very deep in the DOM tree, bubbling up layer by layer to find elements that match the selector will affect performance.
on()
on() actually unifies the previous binding event methods. Check the jQuery uncompressed source code (the version I am looking at here is 1.11.3). You can It is found that both bind() and delegate() are actually implemented through the on() method, but the parameters are different.
bind: function( types, data, fn ) { return this.on( types, null, data, fn ); }, unbind: function( types, fn ) { return this.off( types, null, fn ); }, delegate: function( selector, types, data, fn ) { return this.on( types, selector, data, fn ); } undelegate: function( selector, types, fn ) { // ( namespace ) or ( selector, types [, fn] ) return arguments.length === 1 ? this.off( selector, "**" ) : this.off( types, selector || "**", fn ); }
In the above example, on() can be used for the following binding:
$("div").on("click","p",function(){ alert($(this).text()); })
Official document recommendation:
As of jQuery 1.7, the .on () method is the preferred method for attaching event handlers to a document.
Try to use on() to bind events.
Remove event
Corresponds to the bind(), delegate() and on() binding methods. The methods for removing events are:
$( "div p" ).unbind( "click", handler ); $( "div" ).undelegate( "p", "click", handler ); $( "div" ).off( "click", "p", handler );
Except like In addition to removing the specified event bindings as above, you can also remove all event bindings without passing in parameters. I will not list them one by one here. The official documentation of jQuery is very detailed.
Summary
1. When there are many elements matched by the selector, do not use bind() to iteratively bind
2. When using the id selector, you can Use bind()
3. When you need to bind dynamically added elements, use delegate() or on()
4. Use delegate() and on() methods, dom tree Don’t go too deep
5. Try to use on()
The above is the entire content of this article, I hope everyone will like it.
For more detailed explanations of jQuery event binding on(), bind() and delegate() methods, please pay attention to the PHP Chinese website!

The main uses of JavaScript in web development include client interaction, form verification and asynchronous communication. 1) Dynamic content update and user interaction through DOM operations; 2) Client verification is carried out before the user submits data to improve the user experience; 3) Refreshless communication with the server is achieved through AJAX technology.

Understanding how JavaScript engine works internally is important to developers because it helps write more efficient code and understand performance bottlenecks and optimization strategies. 1) The engine's workflow includes three stages: parsing, compiling and execution; 2) During the execution process, the engine will perform dynamic optimization, such as inline cache and hidden classes; 3) Best practices include avoiding global variables, optimizing loops, using const and lets, and avoiding excessive use of closures.

Python is more suitable for beginners, with a smooth learning curve and concise syntax; JavaScript is suitable for front-end development, with a steep learning curve and flexible syntax. 1. Python syntax is intuitive and suitable for data science and back-end development. 2. JavaScript is flexible and widely used in front-end and server-side programming.

Python and JavaScript have their own advantages and disadvantages in terms of community, libraries and resources. 1) The Python community is friendly and suitable for beginners, but the front-end development resources are not as rich as JavaScript. 2) Python is powerful in data science and machine learning libraries, while JavaScript is better in front-end development libraries and frameworks. 3) Both have rich learning resources, but Python is suitable for starting with official documents, while JavaScript is better with MDNWebDocs. The choice should be based on project needs and personal interests.

The shift from C/C to JavaScript requires adapting to dynamic typing, garbage collection and asynchronous programming. 1) C/C is a statically typed language that requires manual memory management, while JavaScript is dynamically typed and garbage collection is automatically processed. 2) C/C needs to be compiled into machine code, while JavaScript is an interpreted language. 3) JavaScript introduces concepts such as closures, prototype chains and Promise, which enhances flexibility and asynchronous programming capabilities.

Different JavaScript engines have different effects when parsing and executing JavaScript code, because the implementation principles and optimization strategies of each engine differ. 1. Lexical analysis: convert source code into lexical unit. 2. Grammar analysis: Generate an abstract syntax tree. 3. Optimization and compilation: Generate machine code through the JIT compiler. 4. Execute: Run the machine code. V8 engine optimizes through instant compilation and hidden class, SpiderMonkey uses a type inference system, resulting in different performance performance on the same code.

JavaScript's applications in the real world include server-side programming, mobile application development and Internet of Things control: 1. Server-side programming is realized through Node.js, suitable for high concurrent request processing. 2. Mobile application development is carried out through ReactNative and supports cross-platform deployment. 3. Used for IoT device control through Johnny-Five library, suitable for hardware interaction.

I built a functional multi-tenant SaaS application (an EdTech app) with your everyday tech tool and you can do the same. First, what’s a multi-tenant SaaS application? Multi-tenant SaaS applications let you serve multiple customers from a sing


Hot AI Tools

Undresser.AI Undress
AI-powered app for creating realistic nude photos

AI Clothes Remover
Online AI tool for removing clothes from photos.

Undress AI Tool
Undress images for free

Clothoff.io
AI clothes remover

AI Hentai Generator
Generate AI Hentai for free.

Hot Article

Hot Tools

MinGW - Minimalist GNU for Windows
This project is in the process of being migrated to osdn.net/projects/mingw, you can continue to follow us there. MinGW: A native Windows port of the GNU Compiler Collection (GCC), freely distributable import libraries and header files for building native Windows applications; includes extensions to the MSVC runtime to support C99 functionality. All MinGW software can run on 64-bit Windows platforms.

Notepad++7.3.1
Easy-to-use and free code editor

WebStorm Mac version
Useful JavaScript development tools

Dreamweaver Mac version
Visual web development tools

SublimeText3 Mac version
God-level code editing software (SublimeText3)