In fact, looking at the source code of jQuery, I found that the code of each is very simple, but why is the performance different from the native for loop by dozens of times?
jQuery's core code of each
for (; i < length; i++) {
value = callback.call(obj[i], i, obj[i]);
if (value === false) {
break;
}
}Looks very simple, but why is it so much slower?
Write the test code as follows:
var length=300000;
function GetArr() {
var t = [];
for (var i = 0; i < length; i++) {
t[i] = i;
}
return t;
}
function each1(obj, callback) {
var i = 0;
var length = obj.length
for (; i < length; i++) {
value = callback(i, obj[i]);
/* if ( value === false ) {去掉了判断
break;
}*/
}
}
function each2(obj, callback) {
var i = 0;
var length = obj.length
for (; i < length; i++) {
value = callback(i, obj[i]);/*去掉了call*/
if (value === false) {
break;
}
}
}
function each3(obj, callback) {
var i = 0;
var length = obj.length
for (; i < length; i++) {
value = callback.call(obj[i], i, obj[i]);/*自己写的call*/
if (value === false) {
break;
}
}
}
function Test1() {
var t = GetArr();
var date1 = new Date().getTime();
var lengtharr = t.length;
var total = 0;
each1(t, function (i, n) {
total += n;
});
var date12 = new Date().getTime();
console.log("1Test" + ((date12 - date1)));
}
function Test2() {
var t = GetArr();
var date1 = new Date().getTime();
var total = 0;
each2(t, function (i, n) {
total += n;
});
var date12 = new Date().getTime();
console.log("2Test" + ((date12 - date1)));
}
function Test3() {
var t = GetArr();
var date1 = new Date().getTime();
var total = 0;
each3(t, function (i, n) {
total += n;
});
var date12 = new Date().getTime();
console.log("3Test" + ((date12 - date1)));
}
function Test4() {
var t = GetArr();
var date1 = new Date().getTime();
var total = 0;
$.each(t, function (i, n) {
total += n;
});
var date12 = new Date().getTime();
console.log("4Test" + ((date12 - date1)));
}Run the test and find that the difference between the first and second is not very big, which shows that the performance difference caused by the break judgment is very small, but the first The deviation between the second and third, and the fourth is more than double, and the only difference between the second and the third is that call is called. It seems that call will cause performance loss, because call will switch context. Of course, jQuery There are other reasons why each is slow. It also calls other methods in the loop, and call is just one reason.
Therefore, it can be said that call and apply are relatively performance-consuming methods in js. When performance requirements are strict, it is recommended to use them sparingly.
Let’s look at the performance comparison between jquery’s each and js native for loop through a piece of code
<html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<head runat="server">
<title>for与each性能比较</title>
<script src="../Cks/jquery-1.7.1.min.js" type="text/javascript"></script>
<script type="text/javascript" language="javascript">
function getSelectLength() {
var time1 = new Date().getTime();
var len = $("#select_test").find("option").length;
var selectObj = $("#select_test");
for (var i = 0; i < len; i++) {
if (selectObj.get(0).options[i].text == "111111") {
selectObj.get(0).options[i].selected = true;
break;
}
}
var time2 = new Date().getTime();
alert("for循环执行时间：" + (time2 - time1));
time1 = new Date().getTime();
$("#select_test").find("option").each(function () {
if ($(this).text() == "111111") {
$(this)[0].selected = true;
}
});
time2 = new Date().getTime();
alert("each循环执行时间：" + (time2 - time1));
}
</script>
</head>
<body>
<form id="form1" runat="server">
<div><select id="select_test">
<option value='1'>111111</option>
<option value='2'>222222</option>
<option value='3'>333333</option>
<option value='4'>444444</option>
<option value='5'>5</option>
<option value='6'>6</option>
<option value='7'>7</option>
<option value='8'>8</option>
<option value='9'>9</option>
<option value='10'>10</option>
<option value='11'>11</option>
<option value='12'>12</option>
<option value='13'>13</option>
<option value='14'>14</option>
<option value='15'>15</option>
<option value='16'>16</option>
<option value='17'>17</option>
<option value='18'>18</option>
<option value='19'>19</option>
<option value='20'>20</option>
</select><input type="button" value="开始比较" onclick="getSelectLength();" /></div>
<div>
</form>
</body>
</html>Input discrepancy:
for loop execution time: 1
each loop execution time: 3
The two results directly illustrate the problem.
The above is the reason why the jQuery Each is much slower than the JS native for loop performance introduced by the editor. I hope it will be helpful to you. If you have any questions, please leave me a message and the editor will Reply to everyone promptly. I would also like to thank you all for your support of the PHP Chinese website!
For more related articles on why jQuery's Each is much slower than JS's native for loop, please pay attention to the PHP Chinese website!
Python vs. JavaScript: A Comparative Analysis for DevelopersMay 09, 2025 am 12:22 AMThe main difference between Python and JavaScript is the type system and application scenarios. 1. Python uses dynamic types, suitable for scientific computing and data analysis. 2. JavaScript adopts weak types and is widely used in front-end and full-stack development. The two have their own advantages in asynchronous programming and performance optimization, and should be decided according to project requirements when choosing.
Python vs. JavaScript: Choosing the Right Tool for the JobMay 08, 2025 am 12:10 AMWhether to choose Python or JavaScript depends on the project type: 1) Choose Python for data science and automation tasks; 2) Choose JavaScript for front-end and full-stack development. Python is favored for its powerful library in data processing and automation, while JavaScript is indispensable for its advantages in web interaction and full-stack development.
Python and JavaScript: Understanding the Strengths of EachMay 06, 2025 am 12:15 AMPython and JavaScript each have their own advantages, and the choice depends on project needs and personal preferences. 1. Python is easy to learn, with concise syntax, suitable for data science and back-end development, but has a slow execution speed. 2. JavaScript is everywhere in front-end development and has strong asynchronous programming capabilities. Node.js makes it suitable for full-stack development, but the syntax may be complex and error-prone.
JavaScript's Core: Is It Built on C or C ?May 05, 2025 am 12:07 AMJavaScriptisnotbuiltonCorC ;it'saninterpretedlanguagethatrunsonenginesoftenwritteninC .1)JavaScriptwasdesignedasalightweight,interpretedlanguageforwebbrowsers.2)EnginesevolvedfromsimpleinterpreterstoJITcompilers,typicallyinC ,improvingperformance.
JavaScript Applications: From Front-End to Back-EndMay 04, 2025 am 12:12 AMJavaScript can be used for front-end and back-end development. The front-end enhances the user experience through DOM operations, and the back-end handles server tasks through Node.js. 1. Front-end example: Change the content of the web page text. 2. Backend example: Create a Node.js server.
Python vs. JavaScript: Which Language Should You Learn?May 03, 2025 am 12:10 AMChoosing Python or JavaScript should be based on career development, learning curve and ecosystem: 1) Career development: Python is suitable for data science and back-end development, while JavaScript is suitable for front-end and full-stack development. 2) Learning curve: Python syntax is concise and suitable for beginners; JavaScript syntax is flexible. 3) Ecosystem: Python has rich scientific computing libraries, and JavaScript has a powerful front-end framework.
JavaScript Frameworks: Powering Modern Web DevelopmentMay 02, 2025 am 12:04 AMThe power of the JavaScript framework lies in simplifying development, improving user experience and application performance. When choosing a framework, consider: 1. Project size and complexity, 2. Team experience, 3. Ecosystem and community support.
The Relationship Between JavaScript, C , and BrowsersMay 01, 2025 am 12:06 AMIntroduction I know you may find it strange, what exactly does JavaScript, C and browser have to do? They seem to be unrelated, but in fact, they play a very important role in modern web development. Today we will discuss the close connection between these three. Through this article, you will learn how JavaScript runs in the browser, the role of C in the browser engine, and how they work together to drive rendering and interaction of web pages. We all know the relationship between JavaScript and browser. JavaScript is the core language of front-end development. It runs directly in the browser, making web pages vivid and interesting. Have you ever wondered why JavaScr
Hot AI Tools
Undresser.AI Undress
AI-powered app for creating realistic nude photos
AI Clothes Remover
Online AI tool for removing clothes from photos.
Undress AI Tool
Undress images for free
Clothoff.io
AI clothes remover
Video Face Swap
Swap faces in any video effortlessly with our completely free AI face swap tool!
Hot Article
Hot Tools
SublimeText3 Chinese version
Chinese version, very easy to use
mPDF
mPDF is a PHP library that can generate PDF files from UTF-8 encoded HTML. The original author, Ian Back, wrote mPDF to output PDF files "on the fly" from his website and handle different languages. It is slower than original scripts like HTML2FPDF and produces larger files when using Unicode fonts, but supports CSS styles etc. and has a lot of enhancements. Supports almost all languages, including RTL (Arabic and Hebrew) and CJK (Chinese, Japanese and Korean). Supports nested block-level elements (such as P, DIV),
SecLists
SecLists is the ultimate security tester's companion. It is a collection of various types of lists that are frequently used during security assessments, all in one place. SecLists helps make security testing more efficient and productive by conveniently providing all the lists a security tester might need. List types include usernames, passwords, URLs, fuzzing payloads, sensitive data patterns, web shells, and more. The tester can simply pull this repository onto a new test machine and he will have access to every type of list he needs.
MinGW - Minimalist GNU for Windows
This project is in the process of being migrated to osdn.net/projects/mingw, you can continue to follow us there. MinGW: A native Windows port of the GNU Compiler Collection (GCC), freely distributable import libraries and header files for building native Windows applications; includes extensions to the MSVC runtime to support C99 functionality. All MinGW software can run on 64-bit Windows platforms.
SAP NetWeaver Server Adapter for Eclipse
Integrate Eclipse with SAP NetWeaver application server.
