typeof in JavaScript is actually very complex. It can be used to do many things, but it also has many weird behaviors. This article lists its multiple uses, and also points out existing problems and solutions.
The premise of reading this article is that you should now know the difference between primitive values and object values.
Check whether a variable exists and whether it has a value
typeof will return "undefined" in two cases:
The variable is not declared
The value of the variable is undefined
For example:
> typeof undeclaredVariable === "undefined"
true
> var declaredVariable;
> typeof declaredVariable
'undefined'
&g t; typeof undefined
'undefined'
There are other ways to detect whether a value is undefined:
> var value = undefined;
> value === undefined
true
But if this method is used in an undeclared When the variable is on, an exception will be thrown, because only typeof can detect undeclared variables normally without reporting an error:
> undeclaredVariable === undefined
ReferenceError: undeclaredVariable is not defined
Note : Uninitialized variables, formal parameters without passed parameters, and non-existent properties will not have the above problems, because they are always accessible and the value is always undefined:
> var declaredVariable;
> declaredVariable === undefined
true
> (function (x) { return x === undefined }())
true
> ({}).foo = == undefined
true
Translator's Note: Therefore, if you want to detect the existence of a global variable that may not be declared, you can also use if(window.maybeUndeclaredVariable){}.
Problem: typeof seems very complicated when completing such a task.
Solution: This kind of operation is not very common, so some people feel that there is no need to find a better solution. But maybe someone will propose a special operator:
> defined undeclaredVariable
false
> var declaredVariable; Whether the variable is declared by the declaration:
& & gt; Declared UndeClaredvariable
false
& & gt; Var Declaredvariable; DEFINED The operator is equivalent to defined(), and the declared operator above is equivalent to exists().
Determine whether a value is equal to undefined or null
Problem: If you want to detect whether a value has been defined (the value is neither undefined nor null), then you have encountered one of the most famous weird manifestations of typeof ( Considered a bug): typeof null returned "object":
> typeof null
'object'
Translator's Note: This can only be said to be a bug in the original JavaScript implementation, and now the standard is This is standardized. V8 once corrected and implemented typeof null === "null", but it ultimately proved unfeasible. http://wiki.ecmascript.org/doku.php?id=harmony:typeof_null.
(Annotation: typeof returns "object" when operating on null. This is a bug in the JavaScript language itself. Unfortunately, this bug will never be fixed because too much existing code already relies on this Performance. But is null an object? There is a discussion on this issue on stackoverflow: http://stackoverflow.com/questions/801032/null-object-in-javascript/7968470@justjavac)
Solved Solution: Don’t use typeof to do this task, use the following function instead:
function isDefined(x) {
return x !== null && x !== undefined;
}
another One possibility is to introduce a "default value operator". If myValue is not defined, the following expression will return defaultValue:
myValue ?? defaultValue
The above expression is equivalent to:
(myValue !== undefined && myValue !== null) ? myValue : defaultValue
Or:
myValue ??= defaultValue
is actually a simplification of the following statement:
myValue = myValue ??defaultValue
When you access a nested property, such as bar, you may need the help of this operator:
obj.foo.bar
If obj or obj.foo is undefined, The above expression will throw an exception. An operator .?? allows the above expression to return the first encountered attribute whose value is undefined or null when traversing the attributes layer by layer:
obj.??foo.??bar
The above expression is equivalent to:
(obj === undefined || obj === null) ? obj
: (obj.foo === undefined || obj.foo === null) ? obj.foo
: obj.foo.bar
Distinguish between object values and primitive values
The following function is used to detect whether x Is an object value:
function isObject(x) {
return (typeof x === "function"
}Problem: The above detection is more complicated because typeof treats functions and objects as different types, and typeof null returns "object". Solution: The following method is also often used to detect objects Value: function isObject2(x) { return x === Object(x);}Warning: You may think that you can use instanceof Object to detect here, but instanceof uses an object by using The prototype is used to determine the instance relationship, so what to do with objects without prototypes: > var obj = Object.create(null);> Object.getPrototypeOf(obj)nullobj Indeed is an object, but it is not an instance of any value: > typeof obj'object'> obj instanceof ObjectfalseIn practice, you may rarely encounter such an object , but it does exist and has its uses. Translator’s Note: Object.prototype is the only built-in object without a prototype. & & Gt; object.getprototypeof (object.prototype) null & gt; Typeoflact.protothpe'Object' & gt; Object.Prototype What is the type of Object lFalse original value ?typeof is the best way to check the type of a primitive value. > typeof "abc"'string'> typeof undefined'undefined'Problem: You must be aware of the weird behavior of typeof null. > typeof null // Be careful! 'object'Solution: The following function can fix this problem (only for this use case). function getPrimitiveTypeName(x) { var typeName = typeof x; switch(typeName) { case "undefined": case "boolean": case "number": case " string": default: // None of the previous judgments passed throw new TypeError("The parameter is not a primitive value: "+x); }}A better solution: implement a function getTypeName(), which can not only return the type of the original value, but also the object The internal [[Class]] attribute of the value. Here is how to implement this function (Translator's Note: $.type in jQuery is such an implementation) Whether a certain value is a functiontypeof can be used to detect whether a value is a function. > typeof function () {}'function'> typeof Object.prototype.toString'function'In principle, instanceof Function can also detect this requirement. At first glance, it seems that the writing method is more elegant. However, browsers have a quirk: every frame and window has its own global variables. Therefore, if you pass an object from one frame to another, instanceof will not work properly because the two frames have different constructors. This is why there is Array.isArray() method in ECMAScript5. It would be nice if there was a cross-framework method for checking whether an object is an instance of a given constructor. The getTypeName() above is a workaround available, but there may be a more fundamental solution. OverviewThe following mentioned should be the most urgently needed in JavaScript at present, which can replace some of the functional features of typeof’s current responsibilities: isDefined() (such as Object.isDefined()): can be used as A function or an operator isObject() getTypeName() A cross-framework mechanism to detect whether an object is an instance of a specified constructor Check a variable Had such a requirement been declared, it might not be necessary to have its own operator.
The main difference between Python and JavaScript is the type system and application scenarios. 1. Python uses dynamic types, suitable for scientific computing and data analysis. 2. JavaScript adopts weak types and is widely used in front-end and full-stack development. The two have their own advantages in asynchronous programming and performance optimization, and should be decided according to project requirements when choosing.

Whether to choose Python or JavaScript depends on the project type: 1) Choose Python for data science and automation tasks; 2) Choose JavaScript for front-end and full-stack development. Python is favored for its powerful library in data processing and automation, while JavaScript is indispensable for its advantages in web interaction and full-stack development.

Python and JavaScript each have their own advantages, and the choice depends on project needs and personal preferences. 1. Python is easy to learn, with concise syntax, suitable for data science and back-end development, but has a slow execution speed. 2. JavaScript is everywhere in front-end development and has strong asynchronous programming capabilities. Node.js makes it suitable for full-stack development, but the syntax may be complex and error-prone.

JavaScriptisnotbuiltonCorC ;it'saninterpretedlanguagethatrunsonenginesoftenwritteninC .1)JavaScriptwasdesignedasalightweight,interpretedlanguageforwebbrowsers.2)EnginesevolvedfromsimpleinterpreterstoJITcompilers,typicallyinC ,improvingperformance.

JavaScript can be used for front-end and back-end development. The front-end enhances the user experience through DOM operations, and the back-end handles server tasks through Node.js. 1. Front-end example: Change the content of the web page text. 2. Backend example: Create a Node.js server.

Choosing Python or JavaScript should be based on career development, learning curve and ecosystem: 1) Career development: Python is suitable for data science and back-end development, while JavaScript is suitable for front-end and full-stack development. 2) Learning curve: Python syntax is concise and suitable for beginners; JavaScript syntax is flexible. 3) Ecosystem: Python has rich scientific computing libraries, and JavaScript has a powerful front-end framework.

The power of the JavaScript framework lies in simplifying development, improving user experience and application performance. When choosing a framework, consider: 1. Project size and complexity, 2. Team experience, 3. Ecosystem and community support.

Introduction I know you may find it strange, what exactly does JavaScript, C and browser have to do? They seem to be unrelated, but in fact, they play a very important role in modern web development. Today we will discuss the close connection between these three. Through this article, you will learn how JavaScript runs in the browser, the role of C in the browser engine, and how they work together to drive rendering and interaction of web pages. We all know the relationship between JavaScript and browser. JavaScript is the core language of front-end development. It runs directly in the browser, making web pages vivid and interesting. Have you ever wondered why JavaScr


Hot AI Tools

Undresser.AI Undress
AI-powered app for creating realistic nude photos

AI Clothes Remover
Online AI tool for removing clothes from photos.

Undress AI Tool
Undress images for free

Clothoff.io
AI clothes remover

Video Face Swap
Swap faces in any video effortlessly with our completely free AI face swap tool!

Hot Article

Hot Tools

Safe Exam Browser
Safe Exam Browser is a secure browser environment for taking online exams securely. This software turns any computer into a secure workstation. It controls access to any utility and prevents students from using unauthorized resources.

EditPlus Chinese cracked version
Small size, syntax highlighting, does not support code prompt function

ZendStudio 13.5.1 Mac
Powerful PHP integrated development environment

PhpStorm Mac version
The latest (2018.2.1) professional PHP integrated development tool

WebStorm Mac version
Useful JavaScript development tools
