Javascript is an object-based language, and almost everything you encounter is an object. However, it is not a true object-oriented programming (OOP) language because there is no class in its syntax.
So, if we want to encapsulate "property" and "method" into an object, or even generate an instance object from a prototype object, what should we do?
1. The original mode of generating instance objects
Suppose we regard the cat as an object, which has two attributes: "name" and "color".
var Cat = { name : '', color : '' }
Now, we need to generate two instance objects based on the specification (schema) of this prototype object.
var cat1 = {}; // 创建一个空对象 cat1.name = "大毛"; // 按照原型对象的属性赋值 cat1.color = "黄色"; var cat2 = {}; cat2.name = "二毛"; cat2.color = "黑色";
Okay, this is the simplest encapsulation, encapsulating two properties into an object. However, this way of writing has two disadvantages. First, if more instances are generated, it will be very troublesome to write; second, there is no way to see the connection between the instances and the prototype.
2. Improvement of the original mode
We can write a function to solve the problem of code duplication.
function Cat(name,color) { return { name:name, color:color } }
Then generating an instance object is equivalent to calling a function:
var cat1 = Cat("大毛","黄色"); var cat2 = Cat("二毛","黑色");
The problem with this method is still that there is no intrinsic connection between cat1 and cat2, and it cannot reflect that they are instances of the same prototype object.
3. Constructor pattern
In order to solve the problem of generating instances from prototype objects, Javascript provides a constructor pattern.
The so-called "constructor" is actually an ordinary function, but the this variable is used internally. Using the new operator on the constructor will generate an instance, and the this variable will be bound to the instance object.
For example, the prototype object of cat can now be written like this,
function Cat(name,color){ this.name=name; this.color=color; }
We can now generate instance objects.
var cat1 = new Cat("大毛","黄色"); var cat2 = new Cat("二毛","黑色"); alert(cat1.name); // 大毛 alert(cat1.color); // 黄色
At this time, cat1 and cat2 will automatically contain a constructor attribute pointing to their constructor.
alert(cat1.constructor == Cat); //true alert(cat2.constructor == Cat); //true
Javascript also provides an instanceof operator to verify the relationship between prototype objects and instance objects.
alert(cat1 instanceof Cat); //true alert(cat2 instanceof Cat); //true
4. Problems with the constructor pattern
The constructor method is easy to use, but there is a problem of wasting memory.
Please see, we now add an unchanged attribute type (type) to the Cat object, and then add a method eat (eat). Then, the prototype object Cat becomes as follows:
function Cat(name,color){ this.name = name; this.color = color; this.type = "猫科动物"; this.eat = function(){alert("吃老鼠");}; }
Still use the same method to generate an instance:
var cat1 = new Cat("大毛","黄色"); var cat2 = new Cat ("二毛","黑色"); alert(cat1.type); // 猫科动物 cat1.eat(); // 吃老鼠
On the surface, there seems to be no problem, but in fact, there is a big disadvantage in doing so. That is, for each instance object, the type attribute and eat() method have exactly the same content. Every time an instance is generated, it must occupy more memory for repeated content. This is neither environmentally friendly nor efficient.
alert(cat1.eat == cat2.eat); //false
Can the type attribute and eat() method be generated only once in memory, and then all instances point to that memory address? The answer is yes.
5. Prototype mode
Javascript stipulates that each constructor has a prototype attribute that points to another object. All properties and methods of this object will be inherited by the instance of the constructor.
This means that we can define those immutable properties and methods directly on the prototype object.
function Cat(name,color){ this.name = name; this.color = color; } Cat.prototype.type = "猫科动物"; Cat.prototype.eat = function(){alert("吃老鼠")};
Then, generate the instance.
var cat1 = new Cat("大毛","黄色"); var cat2 = new Cat("二毛","黑色"); alert(cat1.type); // 猫科动物 cat1.eat(); // 吃老鼠
At this time, the type attribute and eat() method of all instances are actually the same memory address, pointing to the prototype object, thus improving operating efficiency.
alert(cat1.eat == cat2.eat); //true
6. Prototype mode verification method
In order to cooperate with the prototype attribute, Javascript defines some auxiliary methods to help us use it. ,
6.1 isPrototypeOf()
This method is used to determine the relationship between a certain proptotype object and an instance.
alert(Cat.prototype.isPrototypeOf(cat1)); //true alert(Cat.prototype.isPrototypeOf(cat2)); //true
6.2 hasOwnProperty()
Each instance object has a hasOwnProperty() method, which is used to determine whether a certain property is a local property or a property inherited from the prototype object.
alert(cat1.hasOwnProperty("name")); // true alert(cat1.hasOwnProperty("type")); // false
6.3 in operator
in operator can be used to determine whether an instance contains a certain attribute, whether it is a local attribute or not. The
alert("name" in cat1); // true alert("type" in cat1); // true
in operator can also be used to traverse all properties of an object.
for(var prop in cat1) { alert("cat1["+prop+"]="+cat1[prop]); }

JavaScriptusestwotypesofcomments:single-line(//)andmulti-line(//).1)Use//forquicknotesorsingle-lineexplanations.2)Use//forlongerexplanationsorcommentingoutblocksofcode.Commentsshouldexplainthe'why',notthe'what',andbeplacedabovetherelevantcodeforclari

The main difference between Python and JavaScript is the type system and application scenarios. 1. Python uses dynamic types, suitable for scientific computing and data analysis. 2. JavaScript adopts weak types and is widely used in front-end and full-stack development. The two have their own advantages in asynchronous programming and performance optimization, and should be decided according to project requirements when choosing.

Whether to choose Python or JavaScript depends on the project type: 1) Choose Python for data science and automation tasks; 2) Choose JavaScript for front-end and full-stack development. Python is favored for its powerful library in data processing and automation, while JavaScript is indispensable for its advantages in web interaction and full-stack development.

Python and JavaScript each have their own advantages, and the choice depends on project needs and personal preferences. 1. Python is easy to learn, with concise syntax, suitable for data science and back-end development, but has a slow execution speed. 2. JavaScript is everywhere in front-end development and has strong asynchronous programming capabilities. Node.js makes it suitable for full-stack development, but the syntax may be complex and error-prone.

JavaScriptisnotbuiltonCorC ;it'saninterpretedlanguagethatrunsonenginesoftenwritteninC .1)JavaScriptwasdesignedasalightweight,interpretedlanguageforwebbrowsers.2)EnginesevolvedfromsimpleinterpreterstoJITcompilers,typicallyinC ,improvingperformance.

JavaScript can be used for front-end and back-end development. The front-end enhances the user experience through DOM operations, and the back-end handles server tasks through Node.js. 1. Front-end example: Change the content of the web page text. 2. Backend example: Create a Node.js server.

Choosing Python or JavaScript should be based on career development, learning curve and ecosystem: 1) Career development: Python is suitable for data science and back-end development, while JavaScript is suitable for front-end and full-stack development. 2) Learning curve: Python syntax is concise and suitable for beginners; JavaScript syntax is flexible. 3) Ecosystem: Python has rich scientific computing libraries, and JavaScript has a powerful front-end framework.

The power of the JavaScript framework lies in simplifying development, improving user experience and application performance. When choosing a framework, consider: 1. Project size and complexity, 2. Team experience, 3. Ecosystem and community support.


Hot AI Tools

Undresser.AI Undress
AI-powered app for creating realistic nude photos

AI Clothes Remover
Online AI tool for removing clothes from photos.

Undress AI Tool
Undress images for free

Clothoff.io
AI clothes remover

Video Face Swap
Swap faces in any video effortlessly with our completely free AI face swap tool!

Hot Article

Hot Tools

MantisBT
Mantis is an easy-to-deploy web-based defect tracking tool designed to aid in product defect tracking. It requires PHP, MySQL and a web server. Check out our demo and hosting services.

EditPlus Chinese cracked version
Small size, syntax highlighting, does not support code prompt function

VSCode Windows 64-bit Download
A free and powerful IDE editor launched by Microsoft

ZendStudio 13.5.1 Mac
Powerful PHP integrated development environment

PhpStorm Mac version
The latest (2018.2.1) professional PHP integrated development tool
