Home > Article > Backend Development > Domestic PHP original forum_PHP tutorial
Domestic PHP original forum_PHP tutorial
- WBOYOriginal
- 2016-07-21 16:08:32891browse
Comparison of domestic PHP original forum ofstar ctb wdb discuz fastboard ----- personal summary
Since the travel fastboard is encrypted, I will not make a comparison - of course it is a good program
The following comparison is purely from a technical point of view Let’s start without considering personal expertise. After all, personal expertise varies from person to person!
The following main comparisons: speed, stability, security, load capacity, backend, frontend functions
Comparison of ofstar and ctb
1. In terms of speed, ofstar is much faster than ctb
2. In terms of stability, ctb still adopts the traditional stability concept, which is unstable in a sense!
3. In terms of safety, ctb There are no security issues caused by filtering malicious codes!
4. In terms of load capacity, when a large amount of data exists, the load caused by CTB management, search, threads, and post browsing is relatively large! ofstar adopts a unique The reading and writing algorithm breaks through the load problem of text databases for the first time!
5. Both ctb and ofstar have their own strengths in the background, but in terms of backup, ctb backup is more troublesome
6. The front-end function of ctb is not as good as ofstar!
7, ctb started early, there are more ctb plug-ins, and there are more ready-made styles!
Comparison of ofstar and wdb
All existing wdb (original or hack version) exist Extremely serious security vulnerability, you can easily get the administrator password! Therefore, I won’t make a detailed comparison, let’s keep it simple: stability, security, load capacity, background, and template system are not as good as ofstar, and the speed of other people’s modified versions in the later period is far slower. ofstar
Comparison of ofstar and discuz
ofstar uses a flat file database, discuz uses a mysql database
1, in terms of speed, ofstar is much faster than discuz
2, in terms of stability, due to the use of Comparing different databases, the coverage range is larger, but ofstar’s unique text stability algorithm is better, and it has also been successfully tested in large forums!
3. In terms of security, due to the use of different databases , Comparability is reduced, ofstar is better than discuz free version in terms of code
4. Due to the different physical structure of the database, in terms of load capacity and background management, because ofstar adopts a unique algorithm, the two are comparable!
5. In terms of front-end functions, ofstar does a better job in preventing theft of pictures and attachments. The back-end function discuz user group function is better than that of ofstar, and the others are comparable!
6. discuz developed early and has more plug-ins
(source :pocky)