Nodejs implements bigpipe asynchronous loading page solution_node.js
Introduction to Bigpipe
Facebook's first asynchronous loading page solution that reduces HTTP requests and quickly loads the first screen. It is a direction for front-end performance optimization.
Comparison of BigPipe and AJAX
AJAX is mainly XMLHttpRequest. The front end asynchronously requests the server to obtain dynamic data and add it to the web page. Such round-trip requests take time, and BigPipe technology does not need to send XMLHttpRequest requests, thus saving time. Another benefit of reducing requests is a direct reduction in server load. Another difference is that the server waits before the AJAX request. Page is waiting after request. BIGPIPE can work in parallel on the front and back ends, which also brings efficiency improvements.
Disadvantages of Bigpipe
SEO issues. Facebook's dynamic display content is mainly customer-oriented personalized pages. The requirements for SEO are not high. And if BIGPIPE technology is used on Taobao, SEO problems will be obvious. I am not sure how well Baidu supports the search for this kind of dynamic page. In fact, there will also be this problem when using ANGULARJS to dynamically bind data. Therefore, pages with SEO needs need to carefully consider whether to use BIGPIPE technology. (It is known that GOOGLE search is optimized for ANGULAR's SEO.) As for Baidu -. -Look at the picture below to find out
NODEJS implementation
js imported from bigpipe.js page
var Bigpipe=function(){ this.callbacks={}; } Bigpipe.prototype.ready=function(key,callback){ if(!this.callbacks[key]){ this.callbacks[key]=[]; } this.callbacks[key].push(callback); } Bigpipe.prototype.set=function(key,data){ var callbacks=this.callbacks[key]||[]; for(var i=0;i<callbacks.length;i++){ callbacks[i].call(this,data); } }
app.js server code
var express = require('express'); var path = require('path'); var http = require('http'); var ejs = require('ejs'); var app = express(); app.set('port', process.env.PORT || 3000); app.use(express.static(path.join(__dirname, 'public'))); app.engine('.html', ejs.__express); app.set('view engine', 'html'); app.get('/index.html', function (req, res) { res.render('index', { title: "测试" }, function (err, str) { res.write(str) }) var Pagelets_list ={ pagelet1:false, pagelet2:false } var data = {is: "true"}; function is_end(Pagelets) { Pagelets_list[Pagelets]=true; for (x in Pagelets_list) { if(!Pagelets_list[x]){ return; } } res.end(); return; } function Pagelets(Pagelets) { res.write('<script>bigpipe.set("' + Pagelets + '",' + JSON.stringify(data) + ');</script>'); is_end(Pagelets) } setTimeout(function(){Pagelets("pagelet1");},1000); setTimeout(function(){Pagelets("pagelet2");},3000); }); http.createServer(app).listen(3000);
index.html front-end code
<!doctype html> <html class="no-js"> <head> <meta charset="utf-8"> <meta http-equiv="X-UA-Compatible" content="IE=edge"> <meta name="description" content=""> <meta name="keywords" content=""> <meta name="viewport" content="width=device-width, initial-scale=1, maximum-scale=1, user-scalable=no"> <title>zchq88-bigpipe</title> <!-- Set render engine for 360 browser --> <meta name="renderer" content="webkit"> <!-- No Baidu Siteapp--> <meta http-equiv="Cache-Control" content="no-siteapp"/> <link href="//cdn.bootcss.com/bootstrap/3.3.6/css/bootstrap.min.css" rel="stylesheet"> </head> <body> <div id="test1">loading......</div> <div id="test2">loading......</div> <script src="//cdn.bootcss.com/jquery/2.1.4/jquery.min.js"></script> <script src="//cdn.bootcss.com/bootstrap/3.3.6/js/bootstrap.min.js"></script> <script src="//cdn.bootcss.com/angular.js/1.5.0-rc.0/angular.min.js"></script> <script src="/js/bigpipe.js"></script> <script> var bigpipe=new Bigpipe(); bigpipe.ready('pagelet1',function(data){ $("#test1").html("test1 ready"); }) bigpipe.ready('pagelet2',function(data){ $("#test2").html("test2 ready"); }) </script> </body> </html>
Summary
In fact, the specific implementation of Bigpipe technology requires the cooperation of server code. During development, I feel that functions account for 20% and optimization accounts for 80% of the workload. Optimization is often more difficult than development. A possible understanding of the full stack is also required. So now nodejs as the middle layer that separates the front and back ends is a solution that I personally think is more reasonable. If the front-end and back-end complete the middle layer separation of nodejs, the implementation of Bigpipe technology will be an optimization that the front-end can complete independently. Improve first screen loading time. And improving the loading time of the entire web page will have a certain effect on increasing the number of views.

The main difference between Python and JavaScript is the type system and application scenarios. 1. Python uses dynamic types, suitable for scientific computing and data analysis. 2. JavaScript adopts weak types and is widely used in front-end and full-stack development. The two have their own advantages in asynchronous programming and performance optimization, and should be decided according to project requirements when choosing.

Whether to choose Python or JavaScript depends on the project type: 1) Choose Python for data science and automation tasks; 2) Choose JavaScript for front-end and full-stack development. Python is favored for its powerful library in data processing and automation, while JavaScript is indispensable for its advantages in web interaction and full-stack development.

Python and JavaScript each have their own advantages, and the choice depends on project needs and personal preferences. 1. Python is easy to learn, with concise syntax, suitable for data science and back-end development, but has a slow execution speed. 2. JavaScript is everywhere in front-end development and has strong asynchronous programming capabilities. Node.js makes it suitable for full-stack development, but the syntax may be complex and error-prone.

JavaScriptisnotbuiltonCorC ;it'saninterpretedlanguagethatrunsonenginesoftenwritteninC .1)JavaScriptwasdesignedasalightweight,interpretedlanguageforwebbrowsers.2)EnginesevolvedfromsimpleinterpreterstoJITcompilers,typicallyinC ,improvingperformance.

JavaScript can be used for front-end and back-end development. The front-end enhances the user experience through DOM operations, and the back-end handles server tasks through Node.js. 1. Front-end example: Change the content of the web page text. 2. Backend example: Create a Node.js server.

Choosing Python or JavaScript should be based on career development, learning curve and ecosystem: 1) Career development: Python is suitable for data science and back-end development, while JavaScript is suitable for front-end and full-stack development. 2) Learning curve: Python syntax is concise and suitable for beginners; JavaScript syntax is flexible. 3) Ecosystem: Python has rich scientific computing libraries, and JavaScript has a powerful front-end framework.

The power of the JavaScript framework lies in simplifying development, improving user experience and application performance. When choosing a framework, consider: 1. Project size and complexity, 2. Team experience, 3. Ecosystem and community support.

Introduction I know you may find it strange, what exactly does JavaScript, C and browser have to do? They seem to be unrelated, but in fact, they play a very important role in modern web development. Today we will discuss the close connection between these three. Through this article, you will learn how JavaScript runs in the browser, the role of C in the browser engine, and how they work together to drive rendering and interaction of web pages. We all know the relationship between JavaScript and browser. JavaScript is the core language of front-end development. It runs directly in the browser, making web pages vivid and interesting. Have you ever wondered why JavaScr


Hot AI Tools

Undresser.AI Undress
AI-powered app for creating realistic nude photos

AI Clothes Remover
Online AI tool for removing clothes from photos.

Undress AI Tool
Undress images for free

Clothoff.io
AI clothes remover

Video Face Swap
Swap faces in any video effortlessly with our completely free AI face swap tool!

Hot Article

Hot Tools

VSCode Windows 64-bit Download
A free and powerful IDE editor launched by Microsoft

DVWA
Damn Vulnerable Web App (DVWA) is a PHP/MySQL web application that is very vulnerable. Its main goals are to be an aid for security professionals to test their skills and tools in a legal environment, to help web developers better understand the process of securing web applications, and to help teachers/students teach/learn in a classroom environment Web application security. The goal of DVWA is to practice some of the most common web vulnerabilities through a simple and straightforward interface, with varying degrees of difficulty. Please note that this software

Atom editor mac version download
The most popular open source editor

SublimeText3 English version
Recommended: Win version, supports code prompts!

Notepad++7.3.1
Easy-to-use and free code editor
