Why can’t we see a few websites using the pathinfo url pattern on the market?

Then why is the TP framework the first to use the pathinfo url mode by default?
I just want to ask why the websites of some large companies still use the ordinary url mode? id= 2&code=www and tp’s default Weixin/index/id/2 are rare

Reply content:

Then why is the TP framework the first to use the pathinfo url mode by default?
I just want to ask why the websites of some large companies still use the ordinary url mode? id= 2&code=www and tp’s default Weixin/index/id/2 are rare

The perception is somewhat one-sided. This is not a technical issue but an industrial chain issue.
Domestic corporate websites are still very immature. Half or more of the websites are face-saving projects. They don’t ask for content, just have it. If you have a website, it is not updated very often, let alone professional issues such as business conversion rate and SEO optimization. . Their websites are usually built in an assembly-line manner by some small companies that specialize in corporate websites. Such small companies don't care about technical issues and may still use very early open source CMS. The so-called website building is just to change the theme. This creates the results you see.

In fact; Tencent, Baidu, NetEase, and Sina are all in pathinfo mode; URLs in pathinfo mode are more friendly to search engines; of course; like Taobao, which originally blocks search engine crawling; it is still compatible with ordinary URL mode Better;

Are you sure? Typecho requires the Web Server to turn on pathinfo.