Is DIV CSS technology suitable for small and medium-sized websites in China_html/css_WEB-ITnose

Nowadays, websites of all sizes across the country are engaged in a technological "revolution", which is the so-called "website reconstruction". To put it simply, it is DIV CSS for website production. Use DIV CSS to replace the traditional Table to create frames and beautify pages.
Before refactoring, you must understand why you need to refactor and why use DIV CSS technology? Only by understanding this issue will everyone be motivated to use this technology to reconstruct the website. All major CSS learning websites and tutorials will without exception list the following benefits of using DIV CSS:
1. Content and form are separated. The frontend of the web page only needs to display the content, and the formal art is handled by CSS. The code of the generated HTML file is streamlined, smaller and faster to open.
2. It is simpler and easier to revise the website. There is no need to redesign the layout web page, or even change any HTML and program pages of the original website. All the revisions are completed by just changing the CSS file. For a portal website, revamping is as easy as changing clothes.
3. Search engines are more friendly and it is easier to rank higher.
The above three points are the most attractive and outstanding three points of N many benefits. I will introduce these three points one by one:
The first point is the separation of content and form. The frontend of the web page only needs to display the content, and the formal art is handled by CSS. The code of the generated HTML file is streamlined, smaller and faster to open.
This is the most prominent feature of DIV CSS technology and the root of the existence of CSS. Completely subvert the current traditional (table) web design technology. All content currently produced using tables can be solved using CSS, and the solution is more perfect and more powerful. You don’t need to use tables within tables. You only need to use div within div to achieve all the art of tables within tables. The result is to use div CSS technology to make the generated web page file size more streamlined and smaller. In the table era, it was very common for a page to have more than 10 tables. But now with DIV CSS, a table can be used without even a table, and the previous effect can be completely achieved. This directly leads to a 50% reduction in web page file size compared to when using tables - 80%, which saves webmasters’ hard drive space and makes it faster for visitors to open web pages. Moreover, when using div CSS, unlike when using tables in the past, you have to read all the tables before displaying the page content. Now you can read one page. The div will display an effect, so you don’t have to wait when you open the web page. The benefits are clear and powerful.
This advantage is indeed significant. For any web page built using traditional tables, if the content is large, sometimes it may reach about 30K. When the file is opened, there will definitely be a delay of 0.0 seconds. When using DIV CSS, since there is no table to use, all you see when opening the front desk is the direct content. The CSS files are imported links and are another file. It has nothing to do with the size of the HTML file. The generated HTML file is only one About 10K in size. It is not noticeable when the number of files is small, but when the file size exceeds 10,000, it will still save tens of MB in size.
In fact, these advantages are not very useful now. Why?
Because although the HTML file generated by the table is larger and takes up more space, the current virtual host space costs several hundred yuan. It can reach more than 3G. It is completely sufficient for a small and medium-sized portal or website. Even if it is not enough, if the data volume reaches more than 100,000, the generated HTML file will not use 2G. This cost is actually very expensive for small and medium-sized website owners. It can be completely ignored. Besides, using table means that the opening speed is slow. This can be ignored in the current network environment. Nowadays, everyone uses broadband for Internet access, which is at least 512K. A web page is 30K, and it takes less than a second to open. Using DIV CSS is just as fast. 0.0 seconds, which is basically invisible to everyone. And since both generate HTML, the impact on the server is the same. As long as your virtual host network is stable, there will be no difference in table and div css.

However, when using table to make web page frames and tables, they are all made selectively, which means that you don’t need to write code. It is very simple to enter the border and row and column numbers to meet the production requirements, but using When using div CSS, you have to rely entirely on hand-written code. If you write four lines of code for a table, if a page involves generating more than ten div tables, the hand-written code will exceed 50 lines. Moreover, if you are not good at math or have poor logical thinking skills, Otherwise, your handwritten form will be a mess, with overlapping forms and completely incorrect positions. Because when using div css to write tables, the logical arrangement of the tables depends entirely on your own handwritten code. If you do not have strong handwritten code skills and logic, the time you spend is at least 4 times longer than the time you spend using table creation. About times. Basically, the ID and class defined on a page will not be less than 20 complete pages. If you write 5 sentences for an ID or class by hand, you will need more than 100 sentences of code to make an HTML page. Of course, many of them can be saved as a CSS. The file is called repeatedly. In other words, if the content of the page is the same and the layout is the same, the link CSS can be directly imported.
This is very similar to creating a web page template when generating HTML before. But the time it takes to make this template is several times that of making it with table. Some people have to say here, but when I revise the version, I only need to write another css, and there is no need to generate HTML. Then I want to say that when you write another CSS file revision, I may have already made a page template using table, and automatically generated HTML pages for the entire site. It's not impossible.
If, as a webmaster, you are not particularly confident in handwritten code and your logical thinking ability is not particularly strong, it is recommended that you use traditional tables to create web pages more proficiently and quickly.
The second point is that it is simpler and easier to revise the website. There is no need to redesign the layout web page, or even change any HTML and program pages of the original website. All the revisions are completed by just changing the CSS file.
DIV CSS is as simple and easy as changing a piece of clothing for a portal website. When revising, you don’t need to change the entire site’s HTML page. You only need to rewrite the CSS, and then overwrite the previous CSS with the new CSS to achieve the revision. It's convenient.
Convenience is convenient, but for a website, I would like to ask if it needs to be updated every month? Or should it be updated once every six months? I guess there are very few websites that do this frequently. Nowadays, many well-known websites, including industry and portal websites, including personal websites, are updated once a year at most. You change the version once a year, but you only need to rewrite CSS once a year, and the time it takes you to write CSS is one or two times slower than when I use table to create it (if I am technically proficient). Then why should I use CSS? I can achieve the same effect using table. I can complete the table in two minutes. It takes ten minutes for you to write it with CSS.
The website data volume of small and medium-sized webmasters across the country is generally less than 100,000 pieces of data. Now with the automatic batch generation of HTML function, it will only take a few hours to complete the generation. It's only once a year that you need to worry about it, so it's not a big deal.
So unless your website is updated once a month, you’d better use the most skilled and convenient method to implement web design.
Of course, if you have mastered CSS and are a coding geek. You take what I said as nonsense.
The third point is that search engines are more friendly and it is easier to rank higher.
When I saw this advantage of CSS, I sneered. The translators and writers really don't understand China's Internet environment. This is completely feasible in foreign countries, such as the environment where google.com is commonly used. But given China’s Internet environment where Baidu is the monopoly, it can be completely ignored.
The main ranking basis of search engines, regardless of Baidu and Google, is based on title and weight. They can't use these two points, but use your content to capture data for the main purpose. And the most important point is that about 80% of the traffic of small and medium-sized website owners comes from Baidu. Baidu is now completely manually sorting. Do you think that if you use div CSS, Baidu will rank you first? If you think so I just don’t deserve to be a Chinese webmaster.
No matter what, even if your DIV CSS has this advantage and can make your page rank at the top of Baidu search, do you think you can sit in this position for a long time? In less than a month, as long as your page will be If the traffic you bring reaches a certain amount, Baidu will not negotiate with you. (I refer to the keyword K)
To sum up, I personally feel that DIV CSS should not be too superstitious that it is very good and powerful. It is very powerful and convenient as an important auxiliary for making and beautifying web pages. It can make up for many deficiencies in making table frames and tables and shortcomings in art, but it is too time-consuming and labor-intensive to use it exclusively. It is really not suitable for small and medium-sized website owners across the country. I personally think using table DIV CSS is the best combination and the most time-saving and labor-saving method.
PS: Many CSS materials promote CSS to generate web pages with less code, which means that the generated HTML file has less code, because this kind of HTML file has not been beautified at all. The beautification process statements are all in the CSS file, one CSS file The code is amazing.
An HTML must be used with a CSS file and cannot be used alone.

Published in Qzone on August 27, 2008