


Problems and solutions when using encode scripts and normal scripts together_javascript skills
When I first did script encoding half a year ago, I had no experience in using it, so I asked on 51js if there were any problems with mixing encode scripts and normal scripts. As a result, no constructive opinions were received, which at least illustrates two problems. One is that no one cares, and the other is that there is no problem. Of course, I was more willing to accept the latter result, so I started using the mixed use of encode scripts and normal scripts.
With this understanding, I made a lot of scripts, and it seemed that there were really no problems, so I believed in my original judgment even more. The result was once again tricked by IE. The mixed use of encoded scripts and normal scripts is not without problems, and not all of them have problems, but problems will occur under certain conditions. It is really dizzying. Look at the following example:
<script> <BR> #@~^8gAAAA==~,P~,P,Pr(L^Ycw.WDWOza Rtn/klo~xP6E mOkGUv#@#@&,~P,P~~, @#@&~,P~P,~,P~,P,lVDDcB}4% 1Y 2MWYKOXa Rtnd/moBbi@#@&,P~P,~P,8I@#@&PP~~,P~P@#@&,P~,P,PP}4NnmDR k/CLP',WE mYbGU`*@#@&P~P~~,P~ @#@&P,P~~,PP~~,P~l^nMYcEr(L 1Yc k/CoBbI@#@&P,~P,PP,NIGjkAAA==^#~@ <BR> </script>
<script> <BR> #@~^FgEAAA==~,P~,P,P0!x1OkKx~2mG[`#,`8@#@&@#@&~~P,P,P~2U^KNnRa.WDWOza Rnk/Co~{PW!x1YkKxvb@#@&P~P,P~~, @#@&~P,PP,~~P,P,.kOndkU vv2 mG[Rw.GDWOXancHnk/mo E#p@#@&,P~P,P~~)i@#@&@#@&,PP,~~P,2 mGNn t d/mL ,'~W!xmOrKxc#@#@&,P~,P,PPP@#@&~P,P~P,P~~,PMrYSk ncBAx1W[ /dlTnB*i@#@&,PP~~,P~8p~,V0MAAA==^#~@ <BR> </script>
<script> <BR> function Normal() {} <BR> Normal.prototype.Message = function() <BR> { <BR> WriteLine('Normal.prototype.Message'); <BR> }; <BR> Normal.Message = function() <BR> { <BR> WriteLine('Normal.Message'); <BR> }; <BR> </script>
<script> <BR> var msg = '.prototype.Message" Fail.<br>'; <BR> function WriteLine(msg) { document.write(msg '<br><br>'); } <br><br> var o = new Object(); <BR> try { o.Message(); } <BR> catch(e) { WriteLine('Call "Object' msg e.message); } <BR> try { Object.Message(); } <BR> catch(e) { WriteLine('Call "Object.Message" Fail. <br>' e.message); } <br><br> var e = new Encode(); <BR> try { e.Message(); } <BR> catch(e) { WriteLine('Call "Encode' msg e.message); } <BR> Encode.Message(); <br><br> var n = new Normal(); <BR> try { n.Message(); } <BR> catch(e) { WriteLine('Call "Normal' msg e.message); } <BR> Normal.Message(); <BR> </script>
Save the above code as a *.htm file, and the result after opening is:
Call "Object.prototype.Message" Fail.
Object doesn't support this property or method
Call "Object.Message" Fail.
Object doesn't support this property or method
Encode.prototype.Message
Encode.Message
Normal.prototype.Message
Normal.Message
The two jscript.encode codes above are very simple, that is: Object.prototype.Message = function()
{
alert('Object.prototype.Message');
};
Object.Message = function()
{
alert('Object.Message');
};
function Encode() {}
Encode.prototype.Message = function( )
{
WriteLine('Encode.prototype.Message');
};
Encode.Message = function()
{
WriteLine('Encode.Message');
};
If we replace the two pieces of code above with the two pieces of jscript.encode code in the html, there will be no exceptions in subsequent runs, and we will get this output: Object.prototype.Message
Object.Message
...
The tests of the above code examples have explained the problem of encode script code in detail. That is, prototype methods and static methods imported into JScript built-in objects in encoded scripts cannot be referenced in non-encoded scripts. The Object in the above example is a built-in object of JScript. We imported a prototpye method and a static method Message() respectively. For the non-built-in object Encode, the prototype and static methods we imported in the encoded code can be accessed normally in the non-encoded code.
So how to access the import method of the built-in object? In fact, the solution is not complicated, but it is more cumbersome. We need to use some wrapper methods and put them together with the encoded code so that they can be accessed in non-encoded code. For example, the import of Object above, we can wrap it like this:
Object.prototype .Message = function()
{
WriteLine('Object.prototype.Message');
};
Object.Message = function()
{
WriteLine('Object .Message');
};
var obj = new Object();
function ObjectPrototypeMessage()
{
obj.Message();
}
function ObjectMessage()
{
Object.Message();
}
At this time, we can access the import method of the built-in object in the encoded code through wrapper methods such as ObjectPrototypeMessage and ObjectMessage .

Python is more suitable for beginners, with a smooth learning curve and concise syntax; JavaScript is suitable for front-end development, with a steep learning curve and flexible syntax. 1. Python syntax is intuitive and suitable for data science and back-end development. 2. JavaScript is flexible and widely used in front-end and server-side programming.

Python and JavaScript have their own advantages and disadvantages in terms of community, libraries and resources. 1) The Python community is friendly and suitable for beginners, but the front-end development resources are not as rich as JavaScript. 2) Python is powerful in data science and machine learning libraries, while JavaScript is better in front-end development libraries and frameworks. 3) Both have rich learning resources, but Python is suitable for starting with official documents, while JavaScript is better with MDNWebDocs. The choice should be based on project needs and personal interests.

The shift from C/C to JavaScript requires adapting to dynamic typing, garbage collection and asynchronous programming. 1) C/C is a statically typed language that requires manual memory management, while JavaScript is dynamically typed and garbage collection is automatically processed. 2) C/C needs to be compiled into machine code, while JavaScript is an interpreted language. 3) JavaScript introduces concepts such as closures, prototype chains and Promise, which enhances flexibility and asynchronous programming capabilities.

Different JavaScript engines have different effects when parsing and executing JavaScript code, because the implementation principles and optimization strategies of each engine differ. 1. Lexical analysis: convert source code into lexical unit. 2. Grammar analysis: Generate an abstract syntax tree. 3. Optimization and compilation: Generate machine code through the JIT compiler. 4. Execute: Run the machine code. V8 engine optimizes through instant compilation and hidden class, SpiderMonkey uses a type inference system, resulting in different performance performance on the same code.

JavaScript's applications in the real world include server-side programming, mobile application development and Internet of Things control: 1. Server-side programming is realized through Node.js, suitable for high concurrent request processing. 2. Mobile application development is carried out through ReactNative and supports cross-platform deployment. 3. Used for IoT device control through Johnny-Five library, suitable for hardware interaction.

I built a functional multi-tenant SaaS application (an EdTech app) with your everyday tech tool and you can do the same. First, what’s a multi-tenant SaaS application? Multi-tenant SaaS applications let you serve multiple customers from a sing

This article demonstrates frontend integration with a backend secured by Permit, building a functional EdTech SaaS application using Next.js. The frontend fetches user permissions to control UI visibility and ensures API requests adhere to role-base

JavaScript is the core language of modern web development and is widely used for its diversity and flexibility. 1) Front-end development: build dynamic web pages and single-page applications through DOM operations and modern frameworks (such as React, Vue.js, Angular). 2) Server-side development: Node.js uses a non-blocking I/O model to handle high concurrency and real-time applications. 3) Mobile and desktop application development: cross-platform development is realized through ReactNative and Electron to improve development efficiency.


Hot AI Tools

Undresser.AI Undress
AI-powered app for creating realistic nude photos

AI Clothes Remover
Online AI tool for removing clothes from photos.

Undress AI Tool
Undress images for free

Clothoff.io
AI clothes remover

AI Hentai Generator
Generate AI Hentai for free.

Hot Article

Hot Tools

Atom editor mac version download
The most popular open source editor

MinGW - Minimalist GNU for Windows
This project is in the process of being migrated to osdn.net/projects/mingw, you can continue to follow us there. MinGW: A native Windows port of the GNU Compiler Collection (GCC), freely distributable import libraries and header files for building native Windows applications; includes extensions to the MSVC runtime to support C99 functionality. All MinGW software can run on 64-bit Windows platforms.

EditPlus Chinese cracked version
Small size, syntax highlighting, does not support code prompt function

Dreamweaver Mac version
Visual web development tools

Notepad++7.3.1
Easy-to-use and free code editor