However, you need to know that innerHTML has some problems of its own:
1. When the HTML string contains a script tag (
) marked as defer, if the innerHTML attribute is not handled properly, it will appear on Internet Explorer Causing script injection attacks.
2. Setting innerHTML will destroy existing HTML elements that have registered event handlers, which may cause the potential risk of memory leaks on some browsers.
There are several other minor disadvantages that are worth mentioning:
1. You cannot get references to the elements you just created, and you need to manually add code to get those references ( using DOM APIs).
2. You cannot set the innerHTML attribute on all HTML elements in all browsers (for example, Internet Explorer does not allow you to set the innerHTML attribute on the row element of a table).
I am more concerned about the security and memory issues related to using the innerHTML attribute. Obviously, this is not a new problem, and there are already talented people who have figured out solutions around some of these problems.
Douglas Crockford wrote a cleanup function that is responsible for breaking some circular references caused by HTML element registration event handlers and allowing the garbage collector (garbage collector) to release the memory associated with these HTML elements.
<script>…</script> Removing script tags from HTML strings is not as easy as it looks. A regular expression can achieve the desired effect, although it is difficult to know whether it covers all possibilities.Here is my solution:
/<script>]*>[Ss]*?</script>[^>]*>/ig
Now, let’s combine these two techniques into a single setInnerHTML function , and bind the setInnerHTML function to YAHOO.util.Dom of YUI:
YAHOO.util.Dom.setInnerHTML = function (el, html) {
el = YAHOO.util.Dom.get(el );
if (!el || typeof html !== 'string') {
return null;
}
// Abort circular reference
(function (o) {
var a = o.attributes, i, l, n, c;
if (a) {
l = a.length;
for (i = 0; i n = a[i].name;
if (typeof o[n] === 'function') {
o[n] = null;
> for (i = 0; i c = o.childNodes[i];
// Clear child nodes
arguments.callee(c);
Register all listeners on the element through YUI's addListener > // Remove the script from the HTML string and set the innerHTML attribute
el.innerHTML = html.replace(/
]*>[Ss]*?]*>/ig, "" ; If something is missing from the formula, please let me know.
Obviously, there are many other ways to inject malicious code on web pages. The setInnerHTML function only normalizes the execution behavior of the
tag on all A-grade browsers. If you are going to inject untrusted HTML code, be sure to filter it on the server side first, there are many libraries that can do this.

Understanding how JavaScript engine works internally is important to developers because it helps write more efficient code and understand performance bottlenecks and optimization strategies. 1) The engine's workflow includes three stages: parsing, compiling and execution; 2) During the execution process, the engine will perform dynamic optimization, such as inline cache and hidden classes; 3) Best practices include avoiding global variables, optimizing loops, using const and lets, and avoiding excessive use of closures.

Python is more suitable for beginners, with a smooth learning curve and concise syntax; JavaScript is suitable for front-end development, with a steep learning curve and flexible syntax. 1. Python syntax is intuitive and suitable for data science and back-end development. 2. JavaScript is flexible and widely used in front-end and server-side programming.

Python and JavaScript have their own advantages and disadvantages in terms of community, libraries and resources. 1) The Python community is friendly and suitable for beginners, but the front-end development resources are not as rich as JavaScript. 2) Python is powerful in data science and machine learning libraries, while JavaScript is better in front-end development libraries and frameworks. 3) Both have rich learning resources, but Python is suitable for starting with official documents, while JavaScript is better with MDNWebDocs. The choice should be based on project needs and personal interests.

The shift from C/C to JavaScript requires adapting to dynamic typing, garbage collection and asynchronous programming. 1) C/C is a statically typed language that requires manual memory management, while JavaScript is dynamically typed and garbage collection is automatically processed. 2) C/C needs to be compiled into machine code, while JavaScript is an interpreted language. 3) JavaScript introduces concepts such as closures, prototype chains and Promise, which enhances flexibility and asynchronous programming capabilities.

Different JavaScript engines have different effects when parsing and executing JavaScript code, because the implementation principles and optimization strategies of each engine differ. 1. Lexical analysis: convert source code into lexical unit. 2. Grammar analysis: Generate an abstract syntax tree. 3. Optimization and compilation: Generate machine code through the JIT compiler. 4. Execute: Run the machine code. V8 engine optimizes through instant compilation and hidden class, SpiderMonkey uses a type inference system, resulting in different performance performance on the same code.

JavaScript's applications in the real world include server-side programming, mobile application development and Internet of Things control: 1. Server-side programming is realized through Node.js, suitable for high concurrent request processing. 2. Mobile application development is carried out through ReactNative and supports cross-platform deployment. 3. Used for IoT device control through Johnny-Five library, suitable for hardware interaction.

I built a functional multi-tenant SaaS application (an EdTech app) with your everyday tech tool and you can do the same. First, what’s a multi-tenant SaaS application? Multi-tenant SaaS applications let you serve multiple customers from a sing

This article demonstrates frontend integration with a backend secured by Permit, building a functional EdTech SaaS application using Next.js. The frontend fetches user permissions to control UI visibility and ensures API requests adhere to role-base


Hot AI Tools

Undresser.AI Undress
AI-powered app for creating realistic nude photos

AI Clothes Remover
Online AI tool for removing clothes from photos.

Undress AI Tool
Undress images for free

Clothoff.io
AI clothes remover

AI Hentai Generator
Generate AI Hentai for free.

Hot Article

Hot Tools

EditPlus Chinese cracked version
Small size, syntax highlighting, does not support code prompt function

WebStorm Mac version
Useful JavaScript development tools

Safe Exam Browser
Safe Exam Browser is a secure browser environment for taking online exams securely. This software turns any computer into a secure workstation. It controls access to any utility and prevents students from using unauthorized resources.

SublimeText3 English version
Recommended: Win version, supports code prompts!

Zend Studio 13.0.1
Powerful PHP integrated development environment