search
HomeWeb Front-endJS TutorialJavaScript wraps nodes to improve efficiency_javascript skills

The principle is basically this. If strings are passed in, then let them become an element node. However, this element node can also have many layers, and the elements to be wrapped are placed in the innermost layer. There are several ways to turn strings into element nodes.
1, createElement, IE can create element attributes together, but can only create one layer.
2, innerHTML, but the original string needs to be processed. IE and FF have many unexpected default behaviors, which can add a little more or less for you.
3, createContextualFragment, because Opera’s behavior is a bit weird, you need to select and modify the position of the element. After testing by the Japanese, it is much more efficient and safer than innerHTML in converting strings into nodes. It is true that the strong get stronger and the weak get weaker. If the element node is passed in, it needs to be cloned, otherwise it will become wrapAll. If it is a function, pass the current element in and create a wrapping element using some of its properties.
The initial experiment (wrapOuter here is equivalent to jQuery's wrap):

Copy code The code is as follows:

var parseHTML = function(str) {
if(document.createRange){
var range = document.createRange()
range.setStartAfter(document.body)
return range.createContextualFragment(str)
}else{
return document.createElement(str)
}
}
var wrapOuter = function(target,html){
var wrap = parseHTML (html) ;
target.parentNode.insertBefore(wrap,target);
target.previousSibling.appendChild(target)
}


[Ctrl A select all Note: If you need to introduce external Js, you need to refresh to execute
]

Found that there are some problems
in Opera, range.setStartAfter(document.body) needs to be changed to our target element. Furthermore, the method of inserting wrapped elements is changed from insertBefore to replaceChild to improve efficiency.

The code is as follows:


var wrapOuter = function(target,html){
var wrap = html
if(Object.prototype.toString.call(html) === "[object String]"){
if(document.createRange){
var range=document.createRange ();
range.selectNodeContents(target);
wrap = range.createContextualFragment(html).firstChild;
}else {
wrap = document.createElement(str);
}
}
target.parentNode.replaceChild(wrap,target);
wrap.appendChild(target)
}


[Ctrl A Select all Note:
If you need to introduce external Js, you need to refresh to execute
]
Copy code
The code is as follows:

//Add a parent element (wrapped element) to each matching element,
wrap:function(html){//html can be an element node or an html fragment
var _wrap = function(target,html){
var wrap;
if(is(html,"String")){
if(document.createRange){
var range=document.createRange( );
range.selectNodeContents(target);
wrap = range.createContextualFragment(html).firstChild;
}else {
wrap = document.createElement(html);
}
}else if(html.nodeType){
wrap = html.cloneNode(true)
}
target.parentNode.replaceChild(wrap,target);
wrap.appendChild(target)
}
if(is(html,"Function")){
return this.each(function(el,index){
_wrap(el, html.call(el,index));
});
}
return this.each(function(el){
_wrap(el,html)
});
},

Abstract the method of creating wrapped elements:
Copy code The code is as follows:

var _parseHTML = function(el,html){
var wrap = html;
if(doc.createRange){
var range=doc.createRange();
range.selectNodeContents(el);
var wrap = range.createContextualFragment(html).firstChild;
range.detach();
return wrap;
}else {
return dom.parseHTML(html);
}
}
//Add a parent element (wrapped element) to each matching element,
wrap:function(html){//html can be an element node or an html fragment
var _wrap = function(target,html){
var wrap = html;
if(!wrap.nodeType){
wrap = dom._parseHTML(target,html);
}else{
wrap = html.cloneNode(true)
}
target.parentNode.replaceChild(wrap,target);
wrap.insertBefore(target,null)
}
if(is(html ,"Function")){
return this.each(function(el,index){
_wrap(el, html.call(el,index));
});
}
return this.each(function(el){
_wrap(el,html)
});
},
wrapInner:function(html){
var _wrap = function( target,html){
var wrap = html;
if(!wrap.nodeType){
wrap = dom._parseHTML(target,html);
}else{
wrap = html .cloneNode(true)
}
target.insertBefore(wrap,target.firstChild);
for(var i=1,n=target.childNodes.length;iwrap.appendChild(target.childNodes[i],null)
}
}
if(is(html,"Function")){
return this.each(function(el,index ){
_wrap(el, html.call(el,index));
});
}
return this.each(function(el){
_wrap(el,html )
});
},
//Wrap all matching elements with a tag
//Method: Add a parent element (wrapping) to the first matching element, and then wrap the other matching elements Elements are transferred to this parent element
//wrapAll(html) wrapAll(elem)
wrapAll:function(html){
var wrap = html;
if(!wrap.nodeType)
wrap = dom._parseHTML(this[0],html);
this[0].parentNode.replaceChild(wrap,this[0]);
return this.each(function(el){
wrap.insertBefore(el,null);
});
},

Go to jQuery official website to have a look, I found that its method of wrapping nodes has been upgraded. It can wrap many layers at a time, but mine can only wrap one layer at a time. So I decided to call my original parseHTML method, see here.
Copy code The code is as follows:

var wrap = function(html){//html can be an element node or an html fragment
var _wrap = function(target,html){
var wrap = html;
if(!wrap.nodeType){
if(doc.createRange){
var range=doc.createRange();
range.selectNodeContents(target);
wrap = range.createContextualFragment( html).firstChild;
}else{
wrap = dom.parseHTML(html,null,true).firstChild
}
}else{
wrap = html.cloneNode(true)
}
target.parentNode.replaceChild(wrap,target);
while ( wrap.firstChild && wrap.firstChild.nodeType === 1 ) {
wrap = wrap.firstChild;
}
wrap.insertBefore(target,null)
}
if(is(html,"Function")){
return this.each(function(el,index){
_wrap( el, html.call(el,index));
});
}
return this.each(function(el){
_wrap(el,html)
});
}
//Wrap the child nodes of each matching element with something
var wrapInner = function(html){
var _wrap = function(target,html){
var wrap = html ;
if(!wrap.nodeType){
wrap = dom.parseHTML(html,null,true).firstChild
}else{
wrap = html.cloneNode(true)
}
target.insertBefore(wrap,target.firstChild);
while ( wrap.firstChild && wrap.firstChild.nodeType === 1 ) {
wrap = wrap.firstChild;
}
for(var i=1,n=target.childNodes.length;iwrap.appendChild(target.childNodes[i],null)
}
}
if(is(html,"Function")){
return this.each(function(el,index){
_wrap(el, html.call(el,index));
} );
}
return this.each(function(el){
_wrap(el,html)
});
}
//Wrap all matching elements with a tag
//Method: Add a parent element (wrapper) to the first matching element, and then transfer other matching elements to this parent element
//wrapAll(html) wrapAll(elem)
var wrapAll = function(html){
var wrap = html;
if(!wrap.nodeType){
if(doc.createRange){
var range = doc.createRange();
range.selectNodeContents(this[0]);
wrap = range.createContextualFragment(html).firstChild;
}else{
wrap = dom.parseHTML(html,null,true).firstChild
}
} else{
wrap = html.cloneNode(true)
}
this[0].parentNode.replaceChild(wrap,this[0]);
while ( wrap.firstChild && wrap.firstChild.nodeType === 1 ) {
wrap = wrap.firstChild;
}
return this.each(function(el){
wrap.insertBefore(el, null);
});
}

I found that there are a lot of duplicate codes, and if I abstract it a little more, it is completely incomprehensible to outsiders. I guess jQuery is also doing this step by step. to the obscure.
Copy code The code is as follows:

dom.mixin(dom[fn],(function( ){
var wrapHelper = function(target,html ){
var wrap = html ;
if(!wrap.nodeType){
if(document.createRange){
var range= dom.doc.createRange();
range.selectNodeContents(target);
wrap = range.createContextualFragment(html).firstChild;
} else{
wrap = dom.parseHTML(html,null ,true).firstChild
}
}else{
wrap = html.cloneNode(true)
}
var insertor = wrap;
while ( insertor.firstChild && insertor.firstChild .nodeType === 1 ) {
insertor = insertor.firstChild;
}
return [wrap,insertor]
}
//Wrap all matching elements with a tag
/ /Method: Add a parent element (wrapper) to the first matching element, and then transfer other matching elements to this parent element
//wrapAll(html) wrapAll(elem)
var wrapAll = function(html){
if ( dom.isFunction( html ) ) {
return this.each(function(el,index) {
dom(this).wrapAll( html.call(this, index ));
});
}
var arr = wrapHelper(this[0],html);
var wrap = arr[0],insertor =arr[1];
this[0].parentNode.replaceChild(wrap,this[0]);
return this.each(function(el){
insertor.insertBefore(el,null);
});
}
//Add a parent element (wrapped element) to each matching element,
var wrap= function( html ) {
return this.each(function() {
dom( this ).wrapAll( html );
});
}
//Wrap the child nodes of each matching element with something
var wrapInner = function(html){
var _wrap = function(target,html){
var arr = wrapHelper(target,html);
var wrap = arr[0],insertor =arr[1];
target.insertBefore(wrap, target.firstChild);
for(var i=1,n=target.childNodes.length;iinsertor.appendChild(target.childNodes[i],null)
}
}
if(is(html,"Function")){
return this.each(function(el,index){
_wrap(el, html.call(el,index)) ;
});
}
return this.each(function(el){
_wrap(el,html)
});
}
return {
wrapAll:wrapAll,
wrap:wrap,
wrapInner:wrapInner
}
})());

The unwrap method will be discussed later!
Statement
The content of this article is voluntarily contributed by netizens, and the copyright belongs to the original author. This site does not assume corresponding legal responsibility. If you find any content suspected of plagiarism or infringement, please contact admin@php.cn
Python vs. JavaScript: A Comparative Analysis for DevelopersPython vs. JavaScript: A Comparative Analysis for DevelopersMay 09, 2025 am 12:22 AM

The main difference between Python and JavaScript is the type system and application scenarios. 1. Python uses dynamic types, suitable for scientific computing and data analysis. 2. JavaScript adopts weak types and is widely used in front-end and full-stack development. The two have their own advantages in asynchronous programming and performance optimization, and should be decided according to project requirements when choosing.

Python vs. JavaScript: Choosing the Right Tool for the JobPython vs. JavaScript: Choosing the Right Tool for the JobMay 08, 2025 am 12:10 AM

Whether to choose Python or JavaScript depends on the project type: 1) Choose Python for data science and automation tasks; 2) Choose JavaScript for front-end and full-stack development. Python is favored for its powerful library in data processing and automation, while JavaScript is indispensable for its advantages in web interaction and full-stack development.

Python and JavaScript: Understanding the Strengths of EachPython and JavaScript: Understanding the Strengths of EachMay 06, 2025 am 12:15 AM

Python and JavaScript each have their own advantages, and the choice depends on project needs and personal preferences. 1. Python is easy to learn, with concise syntax, suitable for data science and back-end development, but has a slow execution speed. 2. JavaScript is everywhere in front-end development and has strong asynchronous programming capabilities. Node.js makes it suitable for full-stack development, but the syntax may be complex and error-prone.

JavaScript's Core: Is It Built on C or C  ?JavaScript's Core: Is It Built on C or C ?May 05, 2025 am 12:07 AM

JavaScriptisnotbuiltonCorC ;it'saninterpretedlanguagethatrunsonenginesoftenwritteninC .1)JavaScriptwasdesignedasalightweight,interpretedlanguageforwebbrowsers.2)EnginesevolvedfromsimpleinterpreterstoJITcompilers,typicallyinC ,improvingperformance.

JavaScript Applications: From Front-End to Back-EndJavaScript Applications: From Front-End to Back-EndMay 04, 2025 am 12:12 AM

JavaScript can be used for front-end and back-end development. The front-end enhances the user experience through DOM operations, and the back-end handles server tasks through Node.js. 1. Front-end example: Change the content of the web page text. 2. Backend example: Create a Node.js server.

Python vs. JavaScript: Which Language Should You Learn?Python vs. JavaScript: Which Language Should You Learn?May 03, 2025 am 12:10 AM

Choosing Python or JavaScript should be based on career development, learning curve and ecosystem: 1) Career development: Python is suitable for data science and back-end development, while JavaScript is suitable for front-end and full-stack development. 2) Learning curve: Python syntax is concise and suitable for beginners; JavaScript syntax is flexible. 3) Ecosystem: Python has rich scientific computing libraries, and JavaScript has a powerful front-end framework.

JavaScript Frameworks: Powering Modern Web DevelopmentJavaScript Frameworks: Powering Modern Web DevelopmentMay 02, 2025 am 12:04 AM

The power of the JavaScript framework lies in simplifying development, improving user experience and application performance. When choosing a framework, consider: 1. Project size and complexity, 2. Team experience, 3. Ecosystem and community support.

The Relationship Between JavaScript, C  , and BrowsersThe Relationship Between JavaScript, C , and BrowsersMay 01, 2025 am 12:06 AM

Introduction I know you may find it strange, what exactly does JavaScript, C and browser have to do? They seem to be unrelated, but in fact, they play a very important role in modern web development. Today we will discuss the close connection between these three. Through this article, you will learn how JavaScript runs in the browser, the role of C in the browser engine, and how they work together to drive rendering and interaction of web pages. We all know the relationship between JavaScript and browser. JavaScript is the core language of front-end development. It runs directly in the browser, making web pages vivid and interesting. Have you ever wondered why JavaScr

See all articles

Hot AI Tools

Undresser.AI Undress

Undresser.AI Undress

AI-powered app for creating realistic nude photos

AI Clothes Remover

AI Clothes Remover

Online AI tool for removing clothes from photos.

Undress AI Tool

Undress AI Tool

Undress images for free

Clothoff.io

Clothoff.io

AI clothes remover

Video Face Swap

Video Face Swap

Swap faces in any video effortlessly with our completely free AI face swap tool!

Hot Tools

SublimeText3 Chinese version

SublimeText3 Chinese version

Chinese version, very easy to use

SublimeText3 Mac version

SublimeText3 Mac version

God-level code editing software (SublimeText3)

MantisBT

MantisBT

Mantis is an easy-to-deploy web-based defect tracking tool designed to aid in product defect tracking. It requires PHP, MySQL and a web server. Check out our demo and hosting services.

MinGW - Minimalist GNU for Windows

MinGW - Minimalist GNU for Windows

This project is in the process of being migrated to osdn.net/projects/mingw, you can continue to follow us there. MinGW: A native Windows port of the GNU Compiler Collection (GCC), freely distributable import libraries and header files for building native Windows applications; includes extensions to the MSVC runtime to support C99 functionality. All MinGW software can run on 64-bit Windows platforms.

VSCode Windows 64-bit Download

VSCode Windows 64-bit Download

A free and powerful IDE editor launched by Microsoft