


jQuery Learning Lesson 7 Extending the Functions of jQuery Plug-in Development_jquery
The main body of jQuery is as follows:
(function(){ ……})();
is strange for people who are not very good at Javascript. In effect, this expression declares an anonymous function (first bracket) and then executes it (second bracket). In this function, the definition of a series of jQuery methods and objects is completed. Line 24 is critical,
jQuery = window.jQuery = window.$ = function( selector, context ) {
// The jQuery object is actually just the init constructor 'enhanced'
return new jQuery.fn.init( selector, context );
}
Here, a very powerful $ function is defined. $ is actually an alias for jQuery. jQuery is the "authentic" jQuery function, and the definition of $ is just to reduce the amount of typing by programmers. $ can easily conflict with other libraries. For example, the famous prototype library also uses this name. However, there are much fewer chances for jQuery to conflict with other libraries, so using jQuery is much safer than $. Let’s talk about conflicts next. Look at the definition of return object fn, line 35
jQuery.fn = jQuery.prototype = {
init: function( selector, context ) { … }, …
};
Obviously fn is just a prototype of jQuery Just an abbreviation. An init function is defined. In fact, init acts as jQuery's constructor. When we use code like var i=$('selector'), we can find that the variable i is wrapped by jQuery, that is, i brings the jQuery.fn method. Obviously, i's prototype is pointed to jQuery.fn. In the world of Javascript, it can be said that i is an instance of jQuery. If you try i instanceof jQuery, it will return true. However, i=new $(selector) is not used here; I estimate that $ is such a commonly used function. If you have to use new to construct an object every time, it would be too troublesome. This is the reason for the existence of init , $ itself is defined as a very simple function, with only one line of code inside, returning an init object. Every time we call the $(selector) method, a jQuery object is returned. It smells a bit like factory mode. Of course, if you are familiar with Javascript, you will know that this is not enough. We need to set the prototype of init to jQuery.fn, line 541 of code:
jQuery.fn.init.prototype = jQuery.fn ;
Up to line 540, they are all defined jQuery prototype objects. In OO language, they are equivalent to instance methods. Starting from line 540, a series of jQuery methods are defined, which are equivalent to static methods. At this point, regardless of the specific implementation of the methods (some of which are too difficult), the structure of jQuery is basically clear. Let’s start with the extensions.
The first thing to pay attention to when extending jQuery is to avoid naming conflicts, especially the popular $. jQuery thoughtfully designed a jQuery.noConflict() method, so that jQuery can give up the $ symbol to avoid conflicts with other libraries, and programmers can use the complete symbol jQuery to call the methods provided by jQuery. The implementation of noConflict() is simple and clever. By the way, first of all, in line 21,
// Map over the $ in case of overwrite
_$ = window.$, jQuery first records windows .$, note that this line of code runs very early and will be executed before any jQuery function is executed. Of course, there is a possibility of conflict here, but the probability is too small. Who would use such a weird name as a key variable? At this time, if $ has been occupied by other libraries, its value will remain in _$. At any time, just call the jQuery.noConflict method, line 619, with the following code:
noConflict: function( deep ) {
window.$ = _$;
if ( deep )
window.jQuery = _jQuery;
return jQuery;
},
In this way, $ is returned.
As plug-in developers, we cannot guarantee whether $ will be given away. The safest thing is to call the jQuery method. However, there is a trick to retain the simple $ without affecting other parts, that is:
(function($){
// plugin code goes here, you can use $ safely.
})(jQuery);
Regarding the naming of the plugin’s js file, it is usually jquery.pluginname.js.
It is easy to extend jQuery tool functions (static functions). The following example implements a function that expands a number into a string of fixed digits.
(function($) {
$.toFixedWidth = function(value, length, fill) {
var res = value.toString();
if (!fill) fill = 0;
var padding = length - res.length;
if (padding res = res.substr(-padding);
} else {
for (var n = 0; n res = fill res ;
}
return res;
}
})(jQuery);
It is equally easy to write a wrapper set. Here is a way to make the form elements only Reading method:
$.fn.setReadOnly = function( readonly) {
return this.find('input:text').attr('readonly', readonly).css('opacity', readonly ? 0.5 : 1.0);
}
Write a small page for testing below. This page simulates the order submission page. If the user needs an invoice, he or she needs to fill in the invoice information, otherwise the invoice information cannot be filled in.


Python and JavaScript each have their own advantages, and the choice depends on project needs and personal preferences. 1. Python is easy to learn, with concise syntax, suitable for data science and back-end development, but has a slow execution speed. 2. JavaScript is everywhere in front-end development and has strong asynchronous programming capabilities. Node.js makes it suitable for full-stack development, but the syntax may be complex and error-prone.

JavaScriptisnotbuiltonCorC ;it'saninterpretedlanguagethatrunsonenginesoftenwritteninC .1)JavaScriptwasdesignedasalightweight,interpretedlanguageforwebbrowsers.2)EnginesevolvedfromsimpleinterpreterstoJITcompilers,typicallyinC ,improvingperformance.

JavaScript can be used for front-end and back-end development. The front-end enhances the user experience through DOM operations, and the back-end handles server tasks through Node.js. 1. Front-end example: Change the content of the web page text. 2. Backend example: Create a Node.js server.

Choosing Python or JavaScript should be based on career development, learning curve and ecosystem: 1) Career development: Python is suitable for data science and back-end development, while JavaScript is suitable for front-end and full-stack development. 2) Learning curve: Python syntax is concise and suitable for beginners; JavaScript syntax is flexible. 3) Ecosystem: Python has rich scientific computing libraries, and JavaScript has a powerful front-end framework.

The power of the JavaScript framework lies in simplifying development, improving user experience and application performance. When choosing a framework, consider: 1. Project size and complexity, 2. Team experience, 3. Ecosystem and community support.

Introduction I know you may find it strange, what exactly does JavaScript, C and browser have to do? They seem to be unrelated, but in fact, they play a very important role in modern web development. Today we will discuss the close connection between these three. Through this article, you will learn how JavaScript runs in the browser, the role of C in the browser engine, and how they work together to drive rendering and interaction of web pages. We all know the relationship between JavaScript and browser. JavaScript is the core language of front-end development. It runs directly in the browser, making web pages vivid and interesting. Have you ever wondered why JavaScr

Node.js excels at efficient I/O, largely thanks to streams. Streams process data incrementally, avoiding memory overload—ideal for large files, network tasks, and real-time applications. Combining streams with TypeScript's type safety creates a powe

The differences in performance and efficiency between Python and JavaScript are mainly reflected in: 1) As an interpreted language, Python runs slowly but has high development efficiency and is suitable for rapid prototype development; 2) JavaScript is limited to single thread in the browser, but multi-threading and asynchronous I/O can be used to improve performance in Node.js, and both have advantages in actual projects.


Hot AI Tools

Undresser.AI Undress
AI-powered app for creating realistic nude photos

AI Clothes Remover
Online AI tool for removing clothes from photos.

Undress AI Tool
Undress images for free

Clothoff.io
AI clothes remover

Video Face Swap
Swap faces in any video effortlessly with our completely free AI face swap tool!

Hot Article

Hot Tools

Notepad++7.3.1
Easy-to-use and free code editor

SublimeText3 Mac version
God-level code editing software (SublimeText3)

mPDF
mPDF is a PHP library that can generate PDF files from UTF-8 encoded HTML. The original author, Ian Back, wrote mPDF to output PDF files "on the fly" from his website and handle different languages. It is slower than original scripts like HTML2FPDF and produces larger files when using Unicode fonts, but supports CSS styles etc. and has a lot of enhancements. Supports almost all languages, including RTL (Arabic and Hebrew) and CJK (Chinese, Japanese and Korean). Supports nested block-level elements (such as P, DIV),

MinGW - Minimalist GNU for Windows
This project is in the process of being migrated to osdn.net/projects/mingw, you can continue to follow us there. MinGW: A native Windows port of the GNU Compiler Collection (GCC), freely distributable import libraries and header files for building native Windows applications; includes extensions to the MSVC runtime to support C99 functionality. All MinGW software can run on 64-bit Windows platforms.

MantisBT
Mantis is an easy-to-deploy web-based defect tracking tool designed to aid in product defect tracking. It requires PHP, MySQL and a web server. Check out our demo and hosting services.
